Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | UM Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | |
2 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
3 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
3 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
5 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
6 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% |
7 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 2% |
8 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 9% | |
9 | KIM Nicholas W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% |
10 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% | 4% | |
11 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
12 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
13 | HOOSHI Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 28% | |
14 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | |
14 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
16 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% | |
17 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% |
18 | HUTH Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
19 | WONG Adam L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
20 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
21 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% | |
22 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
23 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% |
24 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 10% | |
25 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
26 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
27 | KIM Yonjae | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 11% |
28 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
29 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
30 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
31 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
32 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
33 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
34 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
35 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
36 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
37 | BANERJEE ANUP | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
38 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
39 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
40 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
41 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% |
42 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | 2% |
43 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
44 | WU Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% |
45 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
46 | HOOSHI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
47 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
48 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
49 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
50 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 8% | |
51 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 92% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
52 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
53 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
54 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
55 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
55 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
57 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
58 | GAO William | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
59 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
60 | KHER Roan | 100% | 92% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | |
61 | LIN Michael | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
62 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
63 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
64 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
65 | WOO Christian | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
66 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 14% | 1% | |
67 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | |
68 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | |
69 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 27% |
70 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
71 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - |
72 | GUO Sean | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
73 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
74 | KIM Andrew J. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
75 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 76% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
76 | MURRAY Maximo | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
77 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
78 | WU Jerry Z. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
79 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
80 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
81 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
82 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 88% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
83 | KIM Jackson | 100% | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
84 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
85 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
86 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
87 | TAN Christien | 100% | 93% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
88 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
89 | PO Oliver | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
90 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
91 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
92 | SEAL Maximus R. | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
93 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 8% | 1% | |
94 | REYES Omar | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | |
95 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
96 | TAN Peter | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
97 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
98 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
98 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 89% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
100 | WONG Adrian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
101 | NGUYEN William | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
102 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | 100% | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
103 | OH Jaden | 100% | 89% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
104 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
104 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
106 | NAM Michael | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
106 | CHAMBERS Eli | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
108 | LI Matthew | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
109 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
110 | BAEK David | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
111 | BERNABE Rafael | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
112 | BERK Theodore | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
113 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
114 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
115 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
116 | HSIAO Nicholas | 100% | 59% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
117 | NGUYEN Liam | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
118 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
119 | FARRELL Spencer | 100% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
120 | KIM Harrison | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.