University of Maryland, College Park Campus - Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PARK Ian C. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 7% |
2 | NORTH Gary S. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% |
3 | SHAH S Ayush | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
3 | CHONG christopher | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
5 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% |
6 | NORTH Alexander M. | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
7 | JIN Owen | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 26% |
8 | KUMAR Aidan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
9 | CHO Tyler H. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% | |
10 | CLICK Aiden | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
11 | KWOUN Miles S. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
12 | KING Cameron | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
13 | HOLTZ Donovan K. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 45% | 43% |
14 | LI Jesse | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
15 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | - | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
16 | MELCHER Jack H. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 33% | 8% |
17 | GAO Daniel | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% |
18 | GATZA Logan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 7% |
19 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 50% | 27% |
20 | KROPP Jack | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
21 | KIM Dylan J. | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
22 | WU Jonathan | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
23 | LEE Samuel Y. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
24 | LEONE III Charles D. | - | - | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 21% |
24 | HERMANSON David B. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | - |
26 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
27 | HANSEN Lars | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
28 | MORSE Tyler | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% |
29 | DANIEL Camron | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
30 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
31 | SU Caleb | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
32 | SMITH Justin C. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
33 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 48% | 20% |
34 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
35 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
36 | CAO Albert | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
37 | VELINOV Gabriel | - | 7% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - |
38 | CHEN Eric | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
39 | SCHULZE Ethan | - | 5% | 31% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - |
40 | ZHANG Caden | - | 5% | 35% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - |
41 | WRIGHT Ezra B. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 19% |
41 | DISIMONE David Z. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
43 | USDIN Anton | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
44 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 42% | 16% |
45 | MAHESH Tarun | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
46 | TRIMMER Colin | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
47 | MATTO Edward J. | 4% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
48 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
49 | WALTHER Bryan M. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
50 | SHEN Max | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - |
51 | HOFFMANN Christopher J. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
52 | LIN Harrison | 14% | 47% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
53 | MCGOVERN Vincent J. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
54 | KOKENGE Reid | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
55 | AYMETT Robert (Skip) S. | 3% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
56 | CAO Brad | - | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
57 | SEID Zachary W. | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
58 | WANG Trontour | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
59 | MING Isaac | 11% | 42% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
60 | MCGUIRK Andrew | 18% | 44% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
61 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
62 | KOKENGE Chad | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
63 | SO Lorenzo | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
64 | TRITHART Jacob M. | 53% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
65 | DOAN Joseph M. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
66 | SINGH Aryaman | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
67 | PENNER Kyle D. | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
68 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 9% |
69 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | - | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
70 | DUAN Eric | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
71 | HARDY Tristan L. | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 31% |
72 | ANDERSON Donald | 20% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
73 | FULLER George K. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 9% |
74 | MOREY Zachary D. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | |
75 | PAN Colin | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - |
76 | BAMPTON Nicholas J. | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
77 | MCGOVERN Patrick | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
78 | ILYAS Zakariya | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
79 | EVANS Allen L. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
80 | DUDLEY Logan M. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
80 | WILLIAMS Rhys | 35% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
82 | PAPPAS Brian | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
83 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
84 | LAM Bill | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
85 | MILLSON Daniel | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
86 | MARKOWITZ William M. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
87 | BOYKO Frank C. | - | 5% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - |
88 | PHILLIPS Ethan D. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
89 | CALDERON Peter J. | 15% | 57% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
90 | CHEN Brian | 19% | 51% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
90 | SELLAR Ian | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
92 | BUI Ryan | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
93 | ZHANG Andy | 32% | 45% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
94 | GAUVEY Ken C. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
95 | HUGHES Michael D. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
96 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
97 | HU Robert J. | 20% | 47% | 26% | 6% | - | - | - |
98 | LI Jeffrey | 2% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
99 | CUCCIARRE Pace | 53% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
100 | TRIPATHY Ayush | 68% | 31% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
101 | BLACK Ethan | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
101 | CARNALL Hunter | 72% | 26% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.