Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 2 | KIM Dohyun | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 27% |
| 3 | MOSES Alexander | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% | |
| 3 | STRAUSS Luke | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 5 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 6 | JIN Daniel | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% |
| 7 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 8 | LI Patrick | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 9 | LEE Seungwon | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 24% |
| 10 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
| 11 | GAO Chaney C. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
| 12 | KOPPE Alexander | 1% | 7% | 22% | 32% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 13 | LIN Kyran | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 14 | FU Leon | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 15 | KNUDSEN Travis | 4% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 16 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 17 | ZHENG Haoran | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 18 | WESTON Tom | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 19 | WANG DEVON | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 20 | WARD Edward | 1% | 5% | 17% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 21 | LIU Andrew | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 38% | 9% |
| 22 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 23 | JONES Caleb | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 24 | WRIGHT Christopher | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 25 | PAK Elliot | 1% | 17% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | LIU Felix | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 27 | KIM Darius H. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 28 | HUSSAIN Kamran | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 28 | ZI QIN Shang | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 30 | TORRES Nicolas | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | SINGHA Orion | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 32 | LO Jake | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% | |
| 33 | MING Nathan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 34 | HIGGINS Branford | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 35 | PARKER Lane S. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 36 | LU Ivan | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 37 | HE Zhiheng | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 38 | DIVERIS Joseph | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | CROSSMAN Brandon | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 40 | DAO Alexander | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 41 | KIM Sterling S. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 42 | KIM Nathan | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | KENT V David | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | AYABINA JR John | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 45 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
| 47 | CHOI Kaiden I. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 48 | PHUKAN Rohin | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 49 | MENDOZA Zachari | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 8% |
| 50 | PARK Elliot | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 51 | SHA Michael | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 51 | YUEN Nathan | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | LOFTUS Luca | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | KIM Sullivan | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 55 | EVERS Gabriel | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 56 | LEE Chun Po | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 56 | MIAO KUNQI | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 58 | YAO Derek (Shunyu) | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 59 | MCADOO Declan | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 60 | QUITORIANO Matthew | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 61 | CHEN Bailey | 5% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 63 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 64 | LEE JiYuen | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 65 | PRAKASH Hari | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 66 | ULINICH Alexander | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 67 | NG Biwon | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 69 | PARK Augustine | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 70 | SCHROEDER Dylan | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 71 | FERRIERE Joshua | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 72 | FANG Hanning | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 73 | WANG owen | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 74 | LIU Yikun | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 76 | ZHANG Nathan | 1% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 77 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 78 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - | |
| 79 | LIU Noah | 21% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 80 | FERDOWSIAN Samuel A | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 81 | REID James | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 82 | QUITORIANO Jonathan | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 83 | CHOI San | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 84 | LIU Yueri | 13% | 37% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 85 | CLAES Lucas | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | BAKKEN Archer | 79% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 87 | XIAO Andrew | < 1% | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 88 | YU Austin | 20% | 37% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 89 | HINTON Evan | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 90 | LI Yunji | 27% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 91 | LI zerong | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | SHEN Jiayi | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 92 | DU Peter | 11% | 45% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | NUGENT Jack | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 94 | FAN Joshua | 10% | 39% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.