Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
2 | KIM Dohyun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% |
3 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | |
3 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
5 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
6 | JIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
7 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
8 | LI Patrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
9 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
10 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | |
11 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
12 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
13 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
14 | FU Leon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
15 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 96% | 68% | 28% | 6% | - | |
16 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
17 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
18 | WESTON Tom | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
19 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
20 | WARD Edward | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 3% |
21 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 9% |
22 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
23 | JONES Caleb | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
24 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
25 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 99% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
26 | LIU Felix | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
27 | KIM Darius H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
28 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
28 | ZI QIN Shang | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
30 | TORRES Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
31 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
32 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 6% | |
33 | MING Nathan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
34 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
35 | PARKER Lane S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
36 | LU Ivan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
37 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
38 | DIVERIS Joseph | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
39 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
40 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
41 | KIM Sterling S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
42 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
42 | KENT V David | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
44 | AYABINA JR John | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
45 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | |
46 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
47 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
48 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
49 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 8% |
50 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 3% |
51 | SHA Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
51 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
53 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
54 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
55 | EVERS Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
56 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
56 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
58 | YAO Derek (Shunyu) | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
59 | MCADOO Declan | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | |
60 | QUITORIANO Matthew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
61 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 95% | 64% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
62 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% |
63 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | |
64 | LEE JiYuen | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
65 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
66 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
67 | NG Biwon | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
68 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
69 | PARK Augustine | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
70 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
71 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
72 | FANG Hanning | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
73 | WANG owen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
74 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
75 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
76 | ZHANG Nathan | 100% | 99% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
77 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
78 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | |
79 | LIU Noah | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
80 | FERDOWSIAN Samuel A | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
81 | REID James | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
82 | QUITORIANO Jonathan | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
83 | CHOI San | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
84 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 87% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
85 | CLAES Lucas | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
86 | BAKKEN Archer | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
87 | XIAO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
88 | YU Austin | 100% | 80% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
89 | HINTON Evan | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
90 | LI Yunji | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
91 | LI zerong | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
92 | SHEN Jiayi | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
92 | DU Peter | 100% | 89% | 44% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
94 | NUGENT Jack | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
94 | FAN Joshua | 100% | 90% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.