March NAC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 2:00 PM

Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 XIAO Ethan J. - - - 1% 8% 34% 57%
2 XIAO Enoch A. - - 2% 12% 30% 38% 17%
3 KIM Nicholas W. - - - 1% 10% 39% 50%
3 CHENG Jonathan - - 1% 5% 20% 42% 33%
5 DESERANNO Jeidus - - - 3% 18% 44% 35%
6 ZENG Lucas H. - - 1% 4% 20% 42% 33%
7 NAGIMOV Marsel - - - - 6% 33% 60%
8 PARK Luke J. - - - 4% 20% 42% 33%
9 CHEN Andrew - 1% 6% 21% 37% 28% 8%
10 CHEN Ziyuan - - - 1% 7% 34% 59%
11 JANG Jaewon - - - 2% 16% 43% 39%
12 OH Jonathan - 1% 10% 32% 39% 16% 1%
13 AUGUSTINE Ethan A. - - 1% 5% 21% 42% 31%
14 LEE Joshua - 1% 9% 25% 35% 24% 6%
15 KIM Brandon J. - - 4% 17% 34% 33% 11%
16 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - 2% 14% 38% 36% 10%
17 HAMILTON Bogdan A. - - - 2% 15% 42% 41%
18 ZHANG Daniel D. - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
18 GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. - - - - 3% 23% 74%
20 WU Alexander - - 3% 14% 34% 36% 13%
21 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - - - 2% 14% 43% 42%
22 WONG Adam L. - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
23 GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. - - - - 5% 33% 62%
24 MITCHELL Philip D. 1% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4% < 1%
25 FUKUDA Alessio R. - - 1% 7% 32% 48% 12%
26 GIRALDO Pablo E. - - 3% 12% 31% 37% 17%
27 LEE Chris - - 3% 14% 34% 36% 13%
28 CHOUN Minwook (Sam) - - 1% 8% 25% 40% 26%
29 SONG Aiden S. - - 2% 12% 41% 46%
30 LIN Dashiell - 1% 7% 24% 38% 25% 6%
31 MURUHIN Yaroslav - 3% 17% 38% 32% 10% 1%
32 FOGELSON Frederick J. - 4% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3%
33 YU Vinni - - - 1% 8% 35% 56%
34 JEON Caleb A. - 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 7%
35 HONDA Kazu Z. - - 2% 18% 45% 35%
36 WU Nicholas - - 4% 17% 34% 33% 12%
37 CHEN Allen - - 4% 20% 40% 31% 6%
38 HUTH Mitchell - - 3% 15% 36% 35% 11%
38 LI Richard - - 2% 15% 39% 35% 9%
40 WANG Andrew - 1% 10% 29% 37% 20% 3%
41 LI Jiaan - 1% 6% 21% 36% 29% 8%
42 UM Ethan A. - - 2% 11% 36% 44% 7%
43 ONIK Elijah T. - 1% 8% 29% 40% 19% 3%
44 BRUK Peter J. - 1% 5% 19% 35% 30% 10%
45 TSAY Jeremy M. - - 3% 15% 38% 34% 9%
45 ZHANG Nicholas Z. - - - - 2% 23% 75%
47 SUNG Chang-Han S. 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 8% -
48 SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. - 1% 11% 35% 39% 13%
49 YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. - 5% 27% 40% 22% 4%
50 ZHANG Yun Isaac - 3% 21% 40% 29% 7%
51 STANLEY Mason B. - 1% 6% 20% 35% 29% 9%
52 ZHANG Henry C. - - 2% 13% 34% 37% 14%
53 ZHANG Luke T. - 3% 16% 35% 32% 12% 2%
54 ZHANG Andy W. - - 3% 12% 31% 37% 17%
55 PELOSKY Zack B. - - 3% 15% 34% 35% 11%
56 KIM Yonjae - - 2% 17% 41% 32% 8%
57 FU Samuel Y. - 1% 7% 23% 35% 26% 8%
58 BURKE Spencer W. - 1% 6% 21% 36% 29% 9%
59 KAO Castor T. - - 2% 9% 27% 41% 22%
59 DEGREMONT Henri S. - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 23%
59 LO Conrad - - 2% 12% 32% 38% 16%
62 SHA Yi Peng - 7% 26% 38% 22% 5% -
63 LAO Scott E. - 1% 8% 28% 40% 21% 3%
64 MCCORD Clark - - 7% 27% 42% 23%
65 FREEDMAN Samuel E. - 2% 17% 37% 31% 11% 1%
66 HOOSHI Dylan M. - - - 4% 20% 43% 33%
67 KASI Sanjay - 2% 11% 30% 38% 18%
68 NGUYEN Nish 1% 5% 18% 32% 29% 13% 2%
69 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) - - 1% 10% 30% 40% 19%
70 HERGAN Luca A. - - 2% 11% 33% 40% 13%
71 ZHAO Jason L. - 4% 16% 33% 31% 13% 2%
72 WONG NICHOLAS A. - 1% 7% 25% 37% 25% 6%
73 CHIRASHNYA Adam 1% 5% 20% 33% 28% 12% 2%
74 FUKUDA Renzo K. - 3% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3%
75 SONG Dylan S. - 2% 10% 27% 35% 22% 5%
76 CHIN Julian S. - - 2% 15% 37% 35% 11%
77 ZELTSER Lawrence M. 5% 22% 36% 27% 10% 1%
78 ZHANG Evan 6% 27% 39% 23% 5% -
79 TIAN Aaron C. - 2% 11% 30% 36% 18% 3%
80 DU Samuel R. 1% 5% 19% 33% 29% 12% 2%
81 CHAN Tyler 1% 6% 25% 38% 25% 5% -
82 BALL James T. - 2% 12% 30% 36% 18% 2%
83 KIM Jackson - 4% 21% 36% 28% 10% 1%
84 CHENG Matthew S. 1% 8% 28% 39% 20% 4% -
85 GODZHIK Zachary - 1% 6% 20% 35% 29% 9%
86 MARX Oscar L. - - 1% 9% 35% 41% 14%
87 DIERKS Kian 1% 7% 23% 34% 25% 9% 1%
88 BAS Liam - 1% 8% 24% 35% 25% 6%
89 DORAN Wesley C. - 6% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1%
90 TSANG Matthew K. - 1% 4% 18% 36% 32% 9%
91 WAN Jason - 1% 6% 22% 39% 27% 6%
92 OH SEAN - 2% 11% 30% 36% 18% 3%
93 MARSHALL Ian - 3% 13% 30% 34% 17% 3%
94 BING Charles - - 3% 15% 38% 37% 8%
95 BAE Kevin 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
96 GRAHAM Roy J. - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
97 JAIN Aditya - 1% 6% 22% 38% 27% 6%
98 DAI Jonathan T. - - 2% 15% 38% 36% 9%
99 RUSADZE Nickolas - 4% 18% 34% 30% 12% 2%
100 WEN George C. 2% 12% 29% 33% 19% 5% -
101 YEROKHIN Michael N. - 2% 12% 34% 40% 13%
102 GORBACHEV Alexander - 1% 12% 36% 38% 13%
103 LAURICELLA Douglas - 2% 16% 41% 34% 8%
104 YU Anders - 4% 17% 36% 33% 11%
105 KUO Evan 6% 25% 37% 25% 7% 1% -
106 MARTOS Jimmy - 1% 6% 22% 38% 28% 5%
107 ANTON Nathaniel 1% 9% 29% 37% 20% 3% -
108 MURRAY Maximo 1% 8% 23% 34% 25% 8% 1%
109 AIBEL Hudson J. 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
110 GALLUCCI Charles John 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 6% -
110 LYU Victor - - 4% 18% 35% 32% 11%
112 OROSZLAN Daniel 1% 7% 23% 34% 25% 9% 1%
113 LEE Aidan - 3% 14% 32% 35% 15% 2%
114 KITAGAWA Eric S. 3% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
115 LUH Ethan K. - 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1%
116 LOVIN Vlad 3% 20% 39% 28% 8% 1% -
117 TSAI Max W. 1% 10% 28% 35% 20% 5% -
118 DANKAR Neel - 3% 16% 34% 32% 12% 1%
119 NG Eben S. 1% 7% 23% 33% 25% 9% 1%
120 WU Jerry 1% 7% 24% 36% 24% 8% 1%
121 KEE Andrew L. 4% 22% 39% 27% 7% -
122 KWON Ethan 1% 14% 43% 32% 9% 1%
123 LI Owen 2% 15% 35% 34% 13% 1%
124 AHN Jun 3% 18% 38% 31% 9% 1%
125 KULKARNI Ansh A. 1% 13% 36% 34% 14% 2% -
126 NAGER Noah - 1% 5% 19% 35% 30% 10%
127 PO Oliver 5% 20% 33% 28% 12% 2% -
128 PAE Jonathan L. - < 1% 2% 14% 35% 36% 13%
129 COSTELLO Chaissen F. - 2% 10% 26% 35% 22% 5%
130 ZHAI Jeffrey 17% 39% 32% 11% 2% -
131 MUSHER Benjamin J. - - 4% 18% 34% 32% 11%
132 JI Evan 9% 30% 37% 19% 4% - -
133 STRUGAR Marcus A. - - 2% 12% 36% 40% 11%
134 HONG Issac 2% 14% 34% 33% 15% 3% -
135 FEDONCHIK Henry J. 7% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
135 BOOTSMA Shane-Anson 5% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1% -
137 PAE Brian L. 1% 9% 27% 34% 22% 7% 1%
138 HOBSON Aaron K. 7% 25% 35% 23% 8% 1% -
139 KIM Derek A. 15% 40% 33% 11% 2% - -
139 DOUGLAS Oscar M. 1% 9% 26% 34% 22% 7% 1%
139 MENG Zhaoyi - 3% 18% 42% 30% 7% -
142 KHER Roan 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
143 CHUANG Kian J. 4% 26% 49% 19% 2% - -
144 JI Aidan Y. 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3% -
145 ELWOOD Sebastian F. 1% 11% 32% 37% 17% 3% -
146 GUERRA Gabriel H. 1% 11% 29% 34% 19% 5% 1%
147 HOU Kenneth 8% 29% 36% 21% 5% 1% -
148 ZHOU Oscar J. - 4% 18% 35% 30% 11% 2%
149 ZHANG Jiening G. 1% 7% 23% 35% 25% 8% 1%
150 COELHO Cristiano P. - 2% 12% 35% 40% 12%
151 XIAO EDWARD 21% 42% 28% 8% 1% -
152 LIM Julien K. 32% 43% 21% 4% - -
153 OUYANG Matt J. 10% 50% 32% 7% 1% -
154 LE Vyn A. 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
155 LI Eric - 4% 22% 39% 26% 7% 1%
156 BAEK David 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
157 WANG Ethan 6% 33% 39% 18% 4% - -
158 GOOR Julian - 1% 7% 25% 41% 23% 4%
159 BERK Theodore - 1% 7% 24% 39% 26% 3%
159 ACHILOV Sayid 4% 21% 36% 27% 10% 2% -
162 BUERGIN Aidan 1% 7% 25% 38% 23% 5% -
163 JIANG Owen - 2% 12% 31% 35% 18% 3%
164 FINLEY Dylan 41% 41% 15% 3% - - -
165 YANG Luao - 1% 5% 19% 35% 30% 10%
166 LI Peihong 6% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
167 GATRELL Mitchell E. 6% 26% 37% 23% 7% 1% -
168 CHEN Wilson - 6% 29% 38% 20% 5% -
168 WOO Christian 3% 19% 39% 29% 9% 1% -
168 AZUELA Maximo 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
171 KLYCZEK Andrew 5% 26% 40% 24% 5% - -
172 MU Jeffrey 36% 46% 16% 2% - - -
173 FINNEY Lorenz 2% 18% 39% 30% 10% 1% -
173 TORRES Treston 19% 39% 30% 11% 2% - -
175 REEVES Liam 5% 30% 38% 21% 5% 1% -
176 BELLUOMO David C. 17% 42% 30% 9% 1% - -
176 GAO William 5% 35% 39% 17% 3% - -
176 BADLANI Dev 13% 40% 35% 11% 1% - -
179 VAN BUREN Brett J. 12% 33% 33% 17% 4% 1% -
180 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. 18% 38% 30% 12% 2% - -
181 PAI Lakshan K. 1% 10% 29% 35% 19% 5% -
182 SAGE Michael J. 19% 43% 29% 8% 1% - -
183 LONG Connor M. 3% 16% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
184 LIN James G. 1% 9% 26% 34% 22% 7% 1%
185 MAHRAN-GALINDO Alex 8% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1% -
186 SONG Austin 5% 23% 37% 26% 7% 1% -
187 LIU Eric Y. 17% 38% 31% 11% 2% - -
188 SONG Bryan 15% 36% 32% 13% 3% - -
189 SOMERS Sean 4% 20% 35% 29% 11% 1%
190 KRYLTSOV Michael 44% 45% 10% 1% - -
191 CATINO Brennen 5% 23% 38% 26% 7% 1%
192 WILLIAMS Connor J. 9% 34% 37% 16% 3% - -
193 PAK Kwan Ting A. 4% 17% 31% 29% 15% 4% -
194 ELKOUSY Laith H. 1% 13% 30% 33% 18% 5% -
195 CANO Diego A. 1% 13% 37% 34% 13% 2% -
195 FU Yifan 1% 11% 34% 38% 14% 2% -
197 GISLER Benjamin B. 6% 27% 40% 23% 5% - -
198 KANG Anthony Jaegu - 4% 18% 35% 31% 11% 1%
199 MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre 6% 29% 39% 20% 5% - -
200 ZHAO Jesse 31% 44% 21% 4% - - -
200 LI Ayren 40% 41% 16% 3% - - -
202 ORVANANOS Jorge 1% 10% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
202 WANG Jackson 7% 27% 37% 23% 6% 1% -
204 LI Ryan Z. 55% 35% 8% 1% - - -
204 DRESSEL Jet 29% 50% 18% 3% - - -
204 MA Andrew 4% 22% 38% 27% 7% 1% -
207 ORONOWICZ Jakub 7% 41% 37% 13% 2% - -
208 DEDENBACH Joseph 28% 41% 23% 7% 1% - -
209 BURGOS patrick 14% 36% 33% 13% 3% - -
210 GUO Sean 4% 18% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
211 GU Hubert 8% 30% 38% 20% 4% - -
212 MILLER Aidan A. 21% 41% 28% 9% 1% - -
212 LIU Jacob B. 2% 17% 34% 30% 13% 3% -
212 BAO Aaron 16% 36% 31% 13% 3% - -
215 KIM BANSEOK 15% 40% 32% 11% 2% - -
216 TAN Christien 4% 22% 39% 26% 8% 1% -
217 MEJIA MATTHEW D. 1% 8% 28% 37% 21% 5% -
217 LLIDO Soren 60% 33% 6% 1% - - -
220 FORTUNE Alexander J. 51% 37% 10% 1% - - -
221 SHEN Troy R. 16% 40% 32% 10% 1% - -
221 SHEN Luke R. 34% 44% 18% 3% - - -
223 LIU Michael H. 1% 9% 30% 37% 19% 4% -
223 PALMA Matthew Dominic 35% 43% 18% 3% - - -
225 WANG mason 33% 45% 19% 3% - - -
226 ZHENG zhe 42% 41% 14% 2% - - -
227 NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. 1% 11% 31% 36% 18% 3%
228 WHITE Austin M. 15% 39% 32% 12% 2% - -
228 CHEN Kyle P. 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
230 CORTRIGHT Joshua C. 30% 51% 17% 2% - -
231 DETERING Julian 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
231 DE COQUET Maximilian 28% 47% 22% 3% - - -
233 LOVE Aaron < 1% 5% 18% 34% 30% 12% 1%
234 ROSS III Paul D. 37% 43% 17% 3% - -
235 TALLARICO Matthew 28% 44% 23% 5% - - -
237 KHVANG Sebastien T. 40% 41% 16% 3% - - -
238 MA Bryant 25% 41% 25% 8% 1% - -
239 CULLIVAN Justice 25% 44% 24% 6% 1% - -
239 YANG Alan H. 71% 26% 3% - - - -
239 PIERCE Cody 9% 32% 36% 18% 5% 1% -
242 ZENG Chuyi 71% 27% 3% - - -
243 SANTOS Carlos R. 18% 39% 31% 10% 1% - -
243 LI Arvin 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3% -
245 WOODTHORPE Michael G. 41% 46% 12% 1% - - -
247 KOKKER Thomas 66% 29% 4% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.