Junior Olympics

Junior Men's Foil

Friday, January 9, 2026 at 1:00 PM

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 JEON Caleb A. - - - - 5% 32% 63%
2 LEE Jacob J - - - - 1% 18% 81%
3 KAO Castor T. - - - - 1% 14% 85%
3 WU Alber Y. - 1% 12% 54% 33%
5 DESHMUKH Arjun - - - - 6% 35% 59%
6 CANLAS Nathan - - - - 4% 33% 63%
7 CORTRIGHT Skipper - - - 3% 21% 54% 22%
8 SISINNI Riccardo - - - - 2% 22% 75%
9 CO Dylan - - 1% 8% 38% 53%
10 QIAN Jason H. - - - 4% 24% 50% 22%
11 GRAHAM Roy J. - - - - 16% 83%
12 GOOR Julian - - - - 5% 55% 40%
12 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - - - 2% 22% 76%
12 JIANG Owen - - 3% 18% 44% 35%
15 TAN Aidan - - - 3% 21% 48% 27%
16 CHEN Kyle P. - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
17 SIU Aiden - - - - 1% 20% 78%
18 MATSAKH Philip - - - - 3% 24% 73%
19 DESERANNO Jeidus - - - - 1% 21% 78%
20 YANG Luao - - - - 1% 15% 85%
21 RUSADZE Nickolas - - - - 5% 34% 61%
21 DINSAY Kristjan - - 1% 10% 34% 41% 14%
23 WANG Aaron - - - 2% 15% 43% 39%
24 LO Conrad - - - - 2% 23% 75%
25 LOZANO Veyron Jericho - 1% 6% 26% 46% 19% 2%
26 LEWIS Akhil - - - 1% 9% 39% 51%
27 DOELL Ethan - - - 6% 45% 44% 5%
28 CHENG Logan - 2% 18% 46% 29% 5%
29 RASMUSSEN Sage - - - 1% 12% 43% 44%
30 YAO Bradley - - - 5% 33% 53% 8%
31 AKYAMAC Bora - - 1% 10% 37% 43% 9%
32 GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) - - 3% 19% 44% 33% 3%
33 KIM Ryan Y. - - - 2% 13% 42% 44%
34 CHENG Ethan - - 1% 6% 26% 47% 21%
34 YI William W. - - 1% 10% 30% 40% 18%
34 PARK Rion - - 3% 16% 40% 38% 3%
37 CHEN Hanson - - 3% 22% 48% 27%
38 WYMAN Julian - - 1% 12% 42% 45%
39 WOO Christian - - - - 6% 38% 56%
40 LEE Christopher T. - - 3% 17% 41% 33% 6%
40 TANG Owen S. - - - 5% 24% 45% 26%
40 FUKUDA Diego - - 2% 14% 35% 36% 13%
43 CULLIVAN Justice - - - - 3% 45% 52%
44 MARTIN Darius - - 1% 10% 36% 41% 12%
45 LI Bradley - - - 1% 7% 35% 57%
46 KLOTZ Isaiah - - 1% 9% 32% 43% 15%
47 ELWOOD Sebastian F. - - - 2% 14% 43% 42%
47 CHUANG Oscar - 1% 6% 25% 41% 23% 4%
47 SHAPIRO Leon - - 3% 16% 37% 35% 9%
50 GUTH Joseph - - 3% 15% 37% 37% 9%
51 SENIC Lucas - - - 2% 14% 42% 42%
51 RODRIGUEZ Tyler - 2% 17% 42% 32% 7% -
53 CHANG Jonathan - - 8% 34% 45% 13%
54 TIYA BIAYA K. - - 6% 44% 50%
55 RAUTUREAU Hugo - - - 4% 21% 46% 29%
56 LO Preston - - 1% 10% 33% 44% 13%
57 GHEDINI Luca - 1% 10% 29% 39% 19% 3%
58 DAI Jonathan T. - - - 1% 9% 42% 49%
59 LEE Abin - 5% 35% 43% 15% 2% -
60 ZHANG Aaron - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
61 CHOI Ethan - 3% 18% 39% 32% 8% 1%
62 SHENG Dalton - - 5% 23% 39% 26% 6%
63 ZHONG Maxwell - 2% 13% 39% 41% 4% -
64 NGUYEN Martin - - 6% 30% 46% 17%
65 BAS Liam - - - - 1% 21% 77%
66 SIMONOV Timofey - - 2% 13% 41% 36% 7%
67 LEE Brendan - - - 2% 16% 46% 36%
68 CHOI Ethan - - 1% 11% 37% 44% 7%
68 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas - 1% 6% 23% 40% 28% 2%
70 LI Matthew - - - 1% 8% 38% 53%
71 YAO Pincheng - 3% 15% 36% 34% 11% 1%
71 LI Richard Y. - - - 1% 8% 36% 55%
73 AHN Jun - - - 3% 22% 49% 26%
74 TANG Alexander L. - - 1% 6% 30% 54% 9%
75 WONG Garrick G. - - 1% 12% 42% 38% 7%
76 PO Oliver - - - 4% 22% 50% 24%
76 YUE Jackson - 8% 30% 38% 20% 4% -
76 KAPOOR Aayan - - 2% 14% 44% 37% 3%
79 BRUK Peter J. - - - - 1% 16% 82%
80 WU Alexander - - - - 1% 16% 83%
81 ROSE Ben - - - 1% 11% 44% 44%
82 LIN James G. - - - 2% 16% 43% 38%
83 TRAUGOT Owen G. - - - 1% 14% 46% 39%
84 GUERRA Gabriel H. - - - 1% 10% 39% 49%
85 LING Eddie - - 1% 10% 41% 40% 8%
86 KRYLTSOV Michael - - - 4% 25% 54% 17%
87 MORROW Brenden - - 5% 25% 44% 23% 2%
88 YU William - 3% 18% 38% 32% 9% 1%
89 LEE Jaden - 1% 13% 36% 37% 12% 1%
90 YOON Junhyeok - 4% 26% 45% 22% 3%
91 DERRICK Blake - - 2% 19% 47% 32%
92 OH SEAN - - 3% 24% 63% 10%
93 RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen - - 1% 9% 30% 41% 20%
94 ROZALSKI Eli - - 3% 16% 38% 37% 5%
95 MIALL Steven A. - - 1% 10% 32% 42% 15%
96 YANG Charles - 7% 29% 39% 20% 4% -
97 WANDJI Noah - - 2% 18% 47% 30% 2%
98 GORDON William L. 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6% -
99 LIU Derek - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 23%
100 QIU Zhaocheng - 1% 9% 30% 40% 18% 3%
101 KIM Brian - - 5% 24% 42% 24% 4%
101 BIELER Mason - 3% 21% 39% 28% 8% 1%
103 BEDWORTH Alistair 6% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1% -
104 SUAREZ Adrian - - 2% 13% 41% 39% 4%
105 TOEWS Jackson - 5% 25% 43% 22% 4% -
106 CHA James - 3% 17% 42% 31% 7% -
107 SONG Aiden S. - - - 1% 14% 49% 35%
107 KIM Harrison - - 5% 27% 45% 20% 3%
109 LIU Yinhong 1% 10% 35% 38% 15% 2% -
109 CHANG Eric Jonathan - 4% 32% 44% 17% 2% -
111 KIM Aiden - 3% 14% 33% 35% 13% 1%
112 NEICE William - 4% 22% 40% 28% 6% -
113 CHEN Anson - 8% 43% 38% 10% 1%
114 ZHAO Nathan 1% 7% 27% 39% 23% 4% -
115 PRUT Anton 1% 13% 38% 35% 12% 1% -
116 WONG Jacob W. 3% 17% 36% 31% 11% 2% -
117 CHO Jadon Yushin - - 1% 8% 31% 47% 14%
118 LEE Ian 1% 11% 30% 36% 18% 4% -
119 HOU Gaven - 1% 11% 34% 41% 12% 1%
120 RAJ Jay - 1% 10% 35% 41% 13% 1%
121 ZHOU Shawn - 4% 24% 45% 24% 4% -
122 THOMSON Hyrum 5% 35% 41% 16% 3% - -
122 MARTIN Mason - 11% 34% 37% 16% 2% -
124 FOY Grant 32% 49% 17% 2% - -
125 LI Aaron - - 1% 10% 38% 40% 10%
126 TAM Kyle 5% 27% 42% 23% 4% - -
127 FUKUDA Brando 3% 19% 39% 31% 8% 1% -
128 ZAIDI Adil 1% 6% 25% 38% 24% 6% -
129 TANG Albert - - - 6% 45% 44% 5%
130 CHEN Ethan - 2% 11% 29% 35% 19% 4%
131 LIU William - - 4% 18% 40% 33% 4%
132 HOWLAND Jonas - - 4% 19% 41% 30% 5%
133 PE Noah 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1% -
134 PLUMMER Waylon 2% 17% 38% 33% 9% 1% -
135 ZHENG Marcus - - 8% 34% 42% 14% 1%
136 ZHANG Jayden 5% 37% 40% 16% 3% - -
136 BLACK Zachary - 5% 21% 38% 28% 7% -
136 LIPPMAN Sam - 7% 30% 40% 19% 3%
139 TIKHAEV Alexander - - 2% 16% 42% 33% 7%
140 XU Andy P. - - 1% 8% 28% 42% 21%
140 LU Kevin - 1% 9% 30% 38% 19% 3%
140 PARK Sky - - 1% 10% 32% 43% 13%
140 BAE Eugene - - 5% 23% 42% 27% 3%
144 HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott - 4% 24% 39% 25% 7% 1%
145 KIM Jonah - 5% 26% 41% 23% 4% -
146 ELKOUSY Zain al Din - 4% 18% 34% 30% 12% 2%
147 KETTELLE John - - 3% 22% 51% 22% 1%
148 CHOI Benjamin - 3% 16% 39% 34% 8% -
149 LIN Michael - - - 2% 16% 48% 34%
150 YAP Nathan - 3% 20% 42% 28% 7% 1%
151 ZHAO Ryan 3% 20% 39% 29% 9% 1% -
152 MCISAAC Finn - 1% 6% 25% 42% 24% 2%
153 BAI Brian 1% 9% 34% 39% 15% 2%
154 CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau 16% 42% 31% 9% 1% - -
155 KIM Daniel 2% 15% 39% 35% 8% 1% -
156 HART-SYED declan 20% 53% 25% 2% -
157 RAUTUREAU Arthur - 9% 40% 38% 11% 1%
158 CHENG Mason 5% 31% 43% 19% 2% -
159 TANG August L. - 1% 7% 25% 38% 24% 5%
160 LIU Ethan - 1% 8% 31% 44% 17%
161 NUCKLES Caden 1% 15% 38% 35% 10% 1% -
162 LU Alex 1% 12% 33% 34% 16% 3% -
163 SONG Noel - - 1% 10% 34% 42% 13%
164 SUAREZ David 1% 11% 35% 38% 14% 1% -
165 HARROCH Faustin - 6% 28% 41% 21% 3% -
166 WANG Elijah (QiChen) 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 5% -
167 KO Caleb - 4% 36% 42% 16% 2% -
168 HUA Aaron - 4% 20% 38% 29% 8% 1%
169 ALLEN Henry G. - 1% 10% 34% 38% 15% 2%
170 WANG Rory - 1% 7% 30% 40% 20% 3%
170 LEE Charles T 1% 12% 35% 39% 13% - -
172 PECK Quinn 1% 9% 31% 38% 18% 3% -
173 RUBY Asher 3% 22% 46% 23% 5% - -
174 ZINSER Jamie 8% 32% 41% 16% 2% - -
175 TSOI Spencer 2% 17% 39% 31% 9% 1% -
175 HARRIS Julien 1% 7% 30% 40% 19% 2% -
177 BAI Austin 1% 7% 24% 37% 24% 7% 1%
178 CHANG Nathan 3% 17% 34% 31% 12% 2% -
179 WONG Evan - - 5% 24% 45% 24% 2%
180 TAN Xinlai - 2% 22% 45% 26% 5% -
181 HARKINS Asher 3% 22% 43% 29% 3% - -
183 METZ Mason - 5% 26% 45% 21% 3% -
184 KUO Phineas 9% 33% 38% 16% 3% - -
185 FANG Haoyu 1% 9% 34% 42% 13% 1% -
186 YOU Martin 8% 37% 39% 15% 2% - -
187 JAZWINSKI Ryan 2% 21% 43% 29% 4% -
188 HAN Alexander 1% 12% 42% 34% 10% 1% -
189 MCKEE Calvin 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1% -
190 ZHANG Jacob - 1% 12% 35% 39% 13% 1%
191 PARK Jayden 2% 16% 39% 33% 9% 1% -
192 HOLLIS Sean - 10% 32% 37% 17% 3% -
193 WEST Abraham 33% 42% 20% 4% - - -
193 ZHANG GAVIN J 1% 10% 34% 38% 16% 2% -
195 MAZAHERI Fletcher - - 3% 22% 46% 26% 3%
196 CHO Xzander - 7% 29% 40% 20% 3% -
197 GONZALEZ Oliver - 3% 21% 41% 29% 5% -
198 MARTIRE Luca 4% 29% 44% 21% 3% - -
198 GATES Combustion 4% 23% 39% 26% 7% 1% -
200 ABRAMKIN Tim 1% 10% 31% 37% 18% 3% -
201 HICKEY Connor 1% 8% 28% 40% 20% 4% -
202 KINGSLEY Griffin 11% 40% 37% 11% 1% - -
203 GRUNENWALD Henri 13% 39% 33% 12% 2% - -
204 EDWARDS Connor 4% 32% 40% 19% 4% - -
205 LI Lucas 2% 12% 30% 35% 18% 4% -
206 ZHAO Brandon 2% 16% 45% 30% 7% - -
207 KUE Temujin 1% 8% 34% 39% 16% 2% -
208 LIM Charlie - 4% 19% 38% 30% 8% 1%
208 ZAPPALA Nikolai 2% 25% 45% 24% 4% - -
210 ARATA Connor - 8% 29% 39% 20% 4% -
211 ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan 1% 7% 29% 41% 20% 3% -
212 YEVDAYEV Tamir 5% 25% 42% 24% 4% - -
213 CHUN Zachary 8% 34% 41% 16% 1% - -
214 CHOI Colin 7% 30% 39% 20% 3% - -
215 SISINNI Leonardo - 4% 19% 38% 31% 8% -
216 GOFF Nathaniel - 2% 14% 35% 35% 14% 2%
217 MILLER Dillon 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5% -
218 NOFZIGER Bennett 4% 22% 40% 27% 6% - -
219 SHANNON Jack 1% 10% 34% 37% 15% 2% -
220 XIE Ethan 47% 41% 10% 1% - - -
221 FLYNT Hayden 21% 40% 29% 9% 1% - -
222 LINEBERRY CADEN 19% 62% 18% 2% - -
224 RODRIGUEZ Lazaro S. 4% 28% 43% 22% 2% -
224 SHIN Noah 4% 30% 52% 13% 1%
226 JIMENEZ Naveen - 2% 23% 46% 25% 4%
227 BHUPATHIRAJU Arjun 20% 56% 21% 3% - -
228 BRADFORD-WATT Ezra 71% 28% 2% - - -
229 LEE Christopher 55% 38% 6% - -
230 TOOMRE Kai 7% 31% 43% 17% 2% - -
231 GUDIMETLA Siddhanth 11% 44% 33% 10% 1% - -
232 LOBEL Dillan 56% 36% 8% 1% - - -
233 ZMUDA Aiden 15% 40% 33% 11% 1% - -
234 OH Joshua 35% 47% 16% 2% - -
235 ZHENG Austin 17% 43% 32% 8% 1% - -
236 WILEY Conor 9% 33% 37% 17% 3% - -
237 ORLOV Dmitriy - 9% 32% 38% 17% 3% -
238 BERETICH Brian 19% 48% 26% 6% - - -
239 WEISS Mateo 1% 17% 48% 28% 5% -
240 HOLMES Alexiy 2% 25% 41% 25% 6% - -
240 STELLPFLUG Zachary 50% 39% 10% 1% - - -
242 JACOB Ezra 11% 33% 35% 16% 3% - -
243 DEPP Edward 61% 35% 4% - - -
244 SHAW Spencer 22% 42% 28% 7% 1% - -
245 BARRETT Austin 3% 28% 44% 21% 4% - -
246 BOWLES Kevin 51% 40% 8% 1% - - -
246 FRANCIS Sebastian 31% 44% 21% 4% - - -
248 WONG Braxton 6% 27% 38% 23% 6% 1% -
249 POLEPALLI Vinil 39% 43% 16% 2% - - -
250 FLANAGAN Miles 6% 36% 42% 15% 2% - -
250 KWON Chase 14% 38% 34% 12% 1% - -
252 YOUNG Luke 41% 43% 14% 2% - - -
253 BALES Gabriel 53% 38% 9% 1% - - -
253 GADIYARAM Madhav 15% 44% 33% 8% 1% - -
255 BABER Shaheer 35% 56% 8% - - - -
256 PONTOPPIDAN Erik 12% 47% 32% 8% 1% - -
257 MOE Annan 1% 10% 34% 37% 16% 2% -
257 STAFFORD Gareth 2% 16% 39% 33% 10% 1% -
259 MCMILLIAN Harrison 9% 34% 38% 16% 2% - -
259 SUNDSTROM Wren 39% 46% 14% 1% - - -
259 YANG David H. 4% 25% 39% 24% 6% 1% -
259 CHENUTULA Abhinav 54% 38% 7% - - - -
259 LEONG Wilson Hua 14% 41% 34% 10% 1% - -
264 WAYBRIGHT Matteo 4% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1% -
264 FLYNN Oliver 58% 35% 7% 1% - - -
264 HAN Nathan 33% 55% 12% 1% - - -
267 ALVAREZ Sebastian 64% 32% 4% - - - -
268 MILES Greyson 15% 37% 33% 13% 2% - -
269 NISHIHIRA Tyler 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
269 RAMESH Prashvin 10% 40% 36% 12% 1% - -
271 GODIN Willis 26% 49% 21% 3% - - -
272 GOWDA Sumeru 19% 52% 25% 4% - - -
272 MCCONKEY Tristan 39% 43% 15% 2% - - -
272 HOLCOMB Alexander 6% 39% 41% 13% 2% - -
272 TIAN Nicolas 45% 42% 12% 1% - - -
276 POPOKH Luca 7% 32% 41% 18% 1% - -
277 PEREZ Logan 18% 54% 25% 3% - -
277 MONSCH Channing 22% 41% 28% 9% 1% - -
279 KIMURA Ryo 12% 46% 33% 9% 1% - -
279 HASTINGS Alex 31% 51% 17% 2% - - -
281 PHAN Henry 13% 46% 32% 8% 1% - -
282 FEEHAN Conor 36% 44% 17% 2% - - -
283 PARK Jubin 54% 37% 9% 1% - -
284 GRIEB Oliver 5% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1% -
285 KARLEKAR Ved 63% 34% 4% - - -
286 WEBSTER Liam 14% 52% 27% 6% 1% - -
286 DIAZ Gabriel 33% 44% 20% 3% - - -
288 PHILLIPS Oliver 39% 43% 16% 2% - - -
289 DENG David 8% 35% 41% 14% 2% - -
289 THIYAGARAJAA Ari 30% 42% 22% 6% 1% - -
289 LUKASIK Michael 74% 23% 2% - - - -
289 GALVAN Omar 62% 32% 5% - - - -
289 VEULEMAN Cayden 50% 39% 10% 1% - - -
294 DAO-CRESPO Joaquin 21% 50% 24% 4% - - -
295 WENGER Liam 36% 45% 17% 2% - - -
296 FACEY Zion 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% - -
296 LEBEDOVYCH Tristin 11% 37% 37% 14% 2% - -
296 KIM Ethen 76% 22% 2% - - - -
299 LUK Trusten 11% 39% 36% 13% 2% - -
299 WALSH Frederic 51% 43% 6% - - - -
299 VERDEJO-BUISSON Nicolas 73% 25% 3% - - - -
299 MANCHALA Vedanth 83% 16% 1% - - - -
299 COLLETTE Toby 54% 42% 3% - - - -
299 FRANCIS Maximillian 55% 36% 9% 1% - - -
305 WENGER Rowan 44% 46% 10% 1% - - -
305 HARWOOD Gray 42% 42% 14% 2% - - -
305 BERNARD Jonathan 64% 32% 4% - - - -
305 BHANOT Arjun 39% 42% 16% 3% - - -
309 SIELSKI Evan 71% 26% 3% - - - -
310 BEREKNYEI Lukas 64% 31% 5% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.