Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
| 2 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 3 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 3 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 27% | |
| 5 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 6 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 7 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 23% |
| 8 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
| 9 | SONG Aiden S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% |
| 10 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 10 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 12 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 42% | |
| 13 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 100% | 96% | 63% | 20% | 2% | |
| 14 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 15 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 16 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 22% | |
| 17 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 18 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% |
| 19 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | TAN Christien | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 21 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 4% |
| 22 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 29% | |
| 24 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% | |
| 25 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | 4% |
| 26 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | 3% |
| 27 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 5% |
| 28 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 29 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 30 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 31 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 32 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 91% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 34 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 35 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
| 36 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
| 37 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | DORAN Wesley C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 7% |
| 40 | KANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
| 41 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | 2% |
| 42 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 43 | MA Andrew | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 44 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 6% |
| 45 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 46 | LIU Michael H. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 47 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | KRYLTSOV Michael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% | |
| 50 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 51 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 5% |
| 52 | OH SEAN | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 53 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 54 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 55 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 56 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 57 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 58 | REYES Omar | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% | 28% | 4% | |
| 59 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | |
| 60 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 60 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 86% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 63 | CANO Marcos E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 5% |
| 64 | HAN Derek | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 65 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 66 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
| 67 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 68 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 68 | LIN James G. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 70 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 71 | PARK Gabriel | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 73 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 74 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 2% | |
| 75 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 76 | LI Ayren | 100% | 92% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 77 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 78 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 79 | PIERCE Cody | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 80 | MA Bryant | 100% | 87% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 82 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 83 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 84 | GORBACHEV Alexander | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 85 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 86 | WU Lucas | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 87 | SHAGIDANYAN German | 100% | 96% | 68% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 88 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 89 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 90 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 91 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 91 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 94 | BEAVER Aaron | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 95 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 96 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 97 | NGUYEN martin | 100% | 59% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 98 | IVANENKO Alex | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 99 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 100 | ORTEGA Jose-Arnel | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 101 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 102 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 103 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 104 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 105 | ANDRIC Borna | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | OH Jaden | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 107 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 108 | QUINTERO Julian | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 109 | WHELAN Alexander H. | 100% | 84% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 110 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 111 | LO Preston | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 112 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 12% | 1% | |
| 113 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 114 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 114 | BOYKO Miles | 100% | 61% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 116 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 117 | BARRETT Austin | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 117 | SUAREZ Adrian | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 119 | CHEN Junxuan | 100% | 53% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 120 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 121 | PARK Ryan | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 122 | HOM Logan | 100% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.