Raleigh Convention Center - Raleigh, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 2 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 29% |
| 3 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% |
| 3 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% |
| 5 | STANLEY Mason B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
| 6 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% |
| 7 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 8 | ROSE Ben | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 9% |
| 9 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | |
| 10 | SONG Aiden S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 11 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | |
| 12 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 13 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% |
| 14 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 41% |
| 15 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% |
| 16 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
| 17 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 18 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
| 19 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
| 20 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 21 | HUTH Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 22 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 24 | OH SEAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 24 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
| 26 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% |
| 27 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 4% |
| 28 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 30 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% | |
| 31 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 3% |
| 32 | LANG Dong Lin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 5% | |
| 33 | COELHO Cristiano P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 34 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | |
| 35 | HAN Changhee | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 36 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% |
| 37 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 38 | LOVE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
| 39 | TANG August L. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 40 | REYES Omar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 41 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
| 42 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 43 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% |
| 44 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 45 | MOHAMED Murad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
| 46 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 47 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 48 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% |
| 49 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 6% |
| 50 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | GAO William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% |
| 52 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 53 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 92% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 55 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 56 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 57 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 58 | NGUYEN Martin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 59 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 60 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 61 | PORRAS Cristian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 15% |
| 62 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 63 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% | |
| 64 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 22% | 2% | |
| 65 | PARK Rion | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | < 1% | |
| 66 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 12% |
| 67 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 68 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 69 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 69 | PARK Jason B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 71 | YOON DYLAN | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 72 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 12% | |
| 73 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 74 | LI Arvin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 75 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 76 | LI Jett | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 77 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 78 | LEE Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 79 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 80 | MOHAMED Amir | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
| 81 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% |
| 82 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
| 82 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 84 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 85 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 85 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 4% |
| 87 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 88 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 89 | YI William | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 90 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 91 | PAI Lakshan K. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 92 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 93 | SAGE Michael P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 94 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
| 95 | LIGOS Alex M. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 96 | KAPOOR Aayan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 97 | HE Xiangrui | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 97 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 99 | XIE Buster | 100% | 92% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 100 | SHAGIDANYAN German | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 101 | HSIAO Nicholas | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 102 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 103 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 103 | YU William | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 105 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 106 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 107 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 108 | TAN Christien | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 109 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 110 | WANG Winston | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 111 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 112 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 112 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 95% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 114 | WANG Rory | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 115 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 116 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 117 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 118 | SONG Austin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 119 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 120 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 121 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 100% | 95% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 122 | DRESSEL Jet | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 123 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 124 | ALVAREZ ADRIAN ALEJANDRO | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 125 | JIANG Bowang | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 126 | KHER Roan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 127 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 128 | FOURNET-FAYARD Aldric | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 129 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
| 130 | FINLEY Dylan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 131 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 132 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 133 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 134 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 135 | BROWN Darius D. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 136 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 137 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 138 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 139 | OH Jaden | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 140 | KOVACS Wyatt | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 141 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 142 | GAO Payton | 100% | 61% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 143 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 144 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 144 | SONG Noel | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 144 | YAP Nathan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 147 | BERNABE Rafael | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 148 | ZHAO Bowen | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 148 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 91% | 52% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 150 | WANG Brayden | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 151 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 152 | WONG Evan | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 153 | WADLEY Brendan E. | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 154 | PARRISH Evan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 155 | CAPRA Ethan | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 156 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 157 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 100% | 96% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 158 | HE Kyle | 100% | 88% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 159 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 160 | WU Lucas | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 160 | GUEVARA Isaac | 100% | 93% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 162 | IVANENKO Alex | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 163 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | 100% | 88% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 164 | ORNELAS Matteo | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 165 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | 100% | 93% | 58% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 165 | ZAIDI Adil | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 167 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 168 | CHEN Kelton | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 169 | LI Allen | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 170 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 171 | BONOMO Sebastian J. | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 172 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 173 | KIM Andy | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 174 | SEMP Iain | 100% | 81% | 34% | 7% | - | - | |
| 175 | YU Jonathan J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 176 | MCKEE Calvin | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 176 | SMOLICH Marat | 100% | 83% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 178 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 179 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 179 | BAI Brian | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 181 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 85% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 181 | SELJAN Matt | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 183 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 184 | BOWLES Kevin | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 184 | ZAPPALA Nikolai | 100% | 33% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.