Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Cadet Men's Épée

Saturday, November 30, 2019 at 12:45 PM

Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 MORSE Tyler - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 14%
2 SHENG Patrick Y. - - 1% 7% 24% 41% 27%
3 DIXON Samuel - 1% 5% 18% 34% 31% 11%
3 BHATNAGAR Ayan 3% 19% 37% 29% 10% 2% -
5 LEE Daniel Y. - - - 5% 20% 42% 32%
6 GROSSMAN August - 1% 5% 21% 38% 29% 7%
7 WOZNIAK Ignacy 2% 15% 36% 35% 12%
8 DIETZ Andor - - 4% 18% 35% 32% 10%
9 PARK Ian C. - 1% 4% 14% 31% 35% 16%
10 KIM William M. - - 2% 10% 30% 40% 19%
11 COLLYMORE Spencer T. - - 1% 6% 24% 42% 27%
12 MAAS Sean H. - 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 4%
13 JUN Jaywu - 3% 13% 28% 33% 19% 4%
14 PIERANUNZI Jules (Wills) W. 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4%
15 VAYSBUKH Konstantin 1% 8% 28% 41% 21%
16 KROPP Jack - 3% 16% 34% 34% 13%
17 GALLANT Antoine - - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
18 CHO Tyler H. - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 15%
19 DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. - 1% 7% 23% 38% 26% 6%
20 SIDDIQUI Humza K. - 2% 14% 37% 36% 11%
21 WIEDERHORN ethan - 1% 10% 28% 36% 20% 4%
22 PAK Charles - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13%
23 BORATIN Daniel I. 1% 6% 21% 36% 28% 9%
24 GANA Jr Jorge M. - - 5% 23% 44% 28%
25 HENSAL Nicolas A. - 4% 14% 29% 31% 18% 4%
26 WU Byron - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
27 JEYOON Ryan S. - 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5%
28 DIXON Thomas 1% 10% 28% 34% 20% 6% 1%
29 WU Jason 1% 6% 20% 33% 27% 11% 2%
30 BINDAS Odinn A. 28% 41% 24% 7% 1% -
31 KUMAR Aidan 8% 28% 35% 21% 7% 1% -
32 CHAI Jonathan 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
33 MISHIMA Torata 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% < 1%
34 LEE Seungwon - 6% 24% 37% 25% 7% 1%
35 PAN Eric - - 3% 15% 33% 35% 13%
36 BASOK Nikita 5% 21% 33% 27% 12% 3% -
37 LAI Coby 1% 7% 26% 37% 24% 6%
38 SALERNO Gaetano - 3% 15% 37% 35% 11%
39 BUYANOV Nikita V. - 3% 15% 34% 35% 14%
40 ZHAO Luhan 19% 41% 30% 9% 1%
41 LIEF Isaac R. - 2% 14% 32% 34% 16% 3%
42 CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. - 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 2%
43 SIVAKUMAR Ajit - 4% 17% 32% 30% 14% 3%
44 HE Lawrence 1% 6% 20% 33% 28% 11% 2%
45 WIMMER Nathaniel P. - - 2% 11% 31% 39% 17%
46 GU Aidan - 3% 14% 30% 33% 17% 3%
47 WHITEHURST JJ 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
48 KOBI Samuel 3% 18% 36% 30% 11% 2%
49 BORODITSKY Ethan - 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 5%
50 CUI Oscar (Bo Lang) 1% 11% 30% 35% 18% 4% -
51 LEE Hudson 3% 17% 35% 31% 13% 2% -
52 ZENG Zihan 1% 8% 22% 32% 25% 10% 1%
53 PARK Frederick 4% 33% 39% 19% 4% - -
54 KING Cameron 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6%
55 SEELEY Charlie 20% 42% 29% 8% 1% -
56 MACARTY Jordan T. 1% 10% 29% 35% 20% 4%
57 CHU Allan 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 6%
58 HANRATTY Liam 2% 13% 28% 32% 19% 6% 1%
59 MUMMIDI Rishi 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
60 MUN Chur-Yong 14% 34% 33% 15% 4% - -
61 CHONG christopher - 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3%
62 WANG Tristan 8% 30% 38% 20% 4%
63 LIU Yichen 9% 30% 35% 20% 6% 1% -
64 WU Marcus 4% 18% 32% 29% 14% 4% -
65 SCHADE Lucas 11% 37% 35% 14% 3% - -
66 ROLLO Emmett H. 8% 29% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
67 NORTH Alexander M. - 4% 17% 34% 31% 12% 2%
68 YUAN Calvin 4% 21% 36% 28% 10% 1%
69 MARTINEZ Joshua 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2%
70 MATEI Daniel 1% 10% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
71 PADHYE Siddhant - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 9%
72 CHAMBLISS Logan C. - 1% 9% 28% 38% 21% 4%
73 CHEN Zhong Han 37% 41% 18% 4% - - -
74 FUSSMAN Yuval 10% 34% 37% 16% 3% - -
75 BANKULLA Nihal R. 1% 9% 29% 35% 20% 5% 1%
76 STEVENS George 10% 32% 37% 18% 3%
77 SONG Alexander 22% 41% 27% 9% 1% -
78 ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) 10% 38% 38% 12% 2% -
79 ZHAO Jonathan 1% 6% 22% 37% 27% 7%
79 LAM Bill 13% 44% 33% 10% 1% -
81 KLUGMAN Reece 9% 30% 36% 19% 5% 1% -
82 KOKENGE Reid 4% 17% 31% 29% 15% 4% -
83 GORTI Agustya 5% 26% 38% 24% 7% 1% -
84 CHOI Marcus 33% 43% 19% 4% - - -
85 KHALITOV Alexander 17% 38% 30% 12% 2% - -
86 KAPLAN Alejandro 7% 31% 39% 18% 4% - -
87 FAN Russell 53% 37% 9% 1% - -
88 PAPAVASSILIOU Christos 72% 25% 3% - - - -
89 SHAO Haian 41% 42% 15% 2% - - -
89 STEWART Charlie 25% 41% 25% 8% 1% - -
89 NASR Paul 16% 43% 32% 8% 1% - -
92 GAO Daniel 40% 46% 12% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.