Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | 2% | 25% | 73% | |
2 | BAS Liam | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
3 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
3 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 44% | 45% |
5 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 47% | 37% | |
6 | LEE Aidan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
7 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 41% | 14% |
8 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% | |
9 | GOOR Julian | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
10 | JEON Caleb A. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
11 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | - | 4% | 43% | 52% |
12 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
13 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
14 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
15 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | - | - | 9% | 55% | 36% |
16 | LIN Michael | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
17 | CHIN Julian S. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 20% |
18 | YU Anders | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
19 | JIANG Owen | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
20 | KEE Andrew L. | 1% | 5% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
21 | KIM Andrew J. | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
22 | OH SEAN | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
23 | WU Alexander | - | - | 3% | 20% | 48% | 28% | |
24 | LISONDRA Niko | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
25 | KIM Yonjae | - | - | 5% | 29% | 54% | 11% | |
26 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
27 | TAN Christien | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
28 | TANG Owen S. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
29 | AHN Jun | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
30 | LI Richard | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
31 | LI Matthew | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
32 | KNIZHNIK David | 4% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | BING Charles | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% |
34 | PO Oliver | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
35 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | - | 1% | 13% | 40% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
36 | DORAN Wesley C. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% | |
37 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
38 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
39 | HOSKERI Anik S. | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
40 | ANTON Nathaniel | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
41 | YAO Bradley | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
42 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
43 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
44 | WONG Antonio | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
45 | REEVES Liam | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 34% | 5% | |
46 | GORBACHEV Alexander | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 7% | |
47 | GUO Sean | 1% | 10% | 36% | 40% | 13% | 1% | |
48 | CHENG Jonathan | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 50% | 24% |
49 | KANG Anthony | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
50 | MA Andrew | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
51 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
51 | LEE Jacob J | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
53 | JI Aidan Y. | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 42% | 6% | - |
54 | CANO Marcos E. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
55 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
56 | GAO William | 4% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | - | |
57 | TORRES Treston | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
58 | ZHOU Oscar J. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
59 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
60 | LEE Lukas | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
61 | WECHSLER Jacob | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
62 | WANG Ethan | 1% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
63 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
64 | TAN Peter | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
65 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
66 | CATINO Brennen | - | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
67 | FLYNN Ian | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
68 | LI Avery Peihong | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
69 | GOGOI Vir K. | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% | 1% | - |
70 | LEE Jacob | 9% | 34% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | |
71 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
72 | WOO Christian | 1% | 14% | 40% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
73 | DETERING Julian | 1% | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
74 | MATSAKH Philip | 18% | 43% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
75 | OH Jaden | 2% | 23% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
76 | WHELAN Alexander H. | 12% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
77 | HUANG Eythan | 13% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
78 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 2% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
79 | BADLANI Dev | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
79 | SUAREZ Adrian | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
81 | PLASTARAS Trey | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
82 | MA Bryant | 17% | 50% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
83 | MYERS Dean | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
84 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 1% | 10% | 34% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
85 | PARK Gabriel | 36% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
86 | WANG Winston | 28% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
87 | LIU Eric Y. | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
88 | PAN Henry | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
89 | ORTEGA Jose-Arnel | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
90 | TANG Albert | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
90 | FUKUDA Diego | 10% | 28% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
92 | EDISON Ansel | 79% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
93 | CHEN Kyle P. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
94 | ZOU Yuming | 62% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
94 | KIAYIAS Aris | 8% | 45% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
96 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 27% | 48% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
97 | WONG Jackson | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
98 | NGUYEN Liam | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
99 | TANG Alexander L. | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
100 | TANG August L. | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
100 | QUINTERO Julian | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
102 | XU Andy P. | < 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
103 | IVANENKO Alex | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
104 | RNO Kyler | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
105 | WANG Brayden | 56% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
106 | HIGGASON Hugh | 72% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
107 | SEMP Iain | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.