December NAC

Cadet Men's Foil

Friday, December 10, 2021 at 8:00 AM

Columbus, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 22%
2 DESERANNO Jeidus 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 54%
3 CHEN Allen 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 46%
3 KIM Nicholas W. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 48%
5 LI Richard 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 47%
6 VAZQUEZ Zander 100% 100% 100% 96% 71% 28% 4%
7 GRAHAM Roy J. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 30%
8 BRUK Peter J. 100% 100% 98% 85% 49% 11%
9 CHEN Andrew 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 34%
9 BAS Liam 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 33%
11 KWON Ethan 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 38%
12 JEON Caleb A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 24%
13 LIANG Lixi (Henry) 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 73% 30%
14 WONG Adam L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 58%
15 AHN Jun 100% 100% 98% 87% 54% 16%
16 PARK Jason B. 100% 92% 62% 24% 5% - -
17 KAO Castor T. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 25%
18 YANG Luao 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 41%
19 RUSADZE Nickolas 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 16%
20 WU Alexander 100% 100% 100% 95% 72% 24%
21 CULLIVAN Justice 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 20%
22 LI Owen 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 61% 16%
23 HOOSHI Jayden C. 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 53% 13%
24 SONG Aiden S. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 69% 22%
25 FOGELSON Frederick J. 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 12%
26 DAI Jonathan T. 100% 100% 99% 95% 78% 43% 11%
27 LO Conrad 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 55%
28 BING Charles 100% 100% 99% 87% 45% 6%
29 YU Anders 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 32% 7%
30 SONG Leonardo T. 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 50% 13%
31 MURUHIN Yaroslav 100% 100% 96% 82% 51% 19% 3%
32 JIANG Owen 100% 100% 93% 69% 31% 7% -
33 BURKE Spencer W. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 40%
34 KIM Yonjae 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 36% 7%
35 HOOSHI Dylan M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 37%
36 ONIK Elijah T. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 27%
37 DORAN Wesley C. 100% 100% 97% 85% 56% 22% 3%
38 LUH Ethan K. 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 40% 7%
39 SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 26%
40 LIN Dashiell 100% 100% 96% 78% 39% 6%
41 LI Raphael C. 100% 100% 100% 94% 67% 19%
42 WU Nicholas 100% 100% 99% 88% 53% 14%
43 UM Ethan A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 68%
44 WOO Christian 100% 100% 78% 35% 7% 1%
45 FUKUDA Alessio R. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 45% 9%
46 COELHO Cristiano P. 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 25% 4%
46 LOVIN Vlad 100% 96% 76% 40% 13% 2% -
48 HORSLEY Alexander 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 25% 3%
49 DEGROOT Blake 100% 95% 75% 41% 13% 2% -
50 TSAY Jeremy M. 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 16% 2%
51 WILLIAMS Connor J. 100% 96% 76% 38% 10% 1% -
52 SICHITIU Alexander 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 35% 7%
53 KNIZHNIK David 100% 98% 81% 45% 13% 2% -
54 PELOSKY Zack B. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 15%
55 ZHANG Andy W. 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 39%
56 LU Yikai 100% 100% 95% 74% 34% 6%
57 KEE Andrew L. 100% 98% 84% 49% 14% 1%
58 REEVES Liam 100% 96% 74% 35% 8% -
59 OH SEAN 100% 99% 89% 63% 28% 7% 1%
60 NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 22% 3%
60 DIERKS Kian 100% 100% 97% 84% 56% 22% 3%
60 SADOVSKY Leor B. 100% 100% 99% 87% 52% 15% 2%
63 BANERJEE ANUP 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 17%
64 BAE Kevin 100% 100% 99% 89% 62% 25% 4%
65 FUKUDA Renzo K. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 20%
66 WYMAN Julian 100% 100% 96% 77% 41% 12% 1%
67 HUTH Mitchell 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 86% 43%
68 GODZHIK Zachary 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 16%
69 SINGH Dayaal 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 29%
70 WONG Antonio 100% 74% 30% 6% 1% -
71 GOGOI Vir K. 100% 90% 56% 19% 3% -
72 DU Samuel R. 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 26% 5%
73 BADLANI Dev 100% 96% 67% 28% 6% - -
74 HOBSON Aaron K. 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 15% 2%
75 SHA Yi Peng 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 37% 6%
76 ZELTSER Lawrence M. 100% 100% 100% 94% 70% 30% 4%
77 ACHILOV Sayid 100% 100% 94% 72% 37% 10% 1%
78 LI Eric 100% 100% 100% 93% 67% 27% 3%
79 KRYLTSOV Michael 100% 94% 70% 35% 11% 2% -
80 TAN Christien 100% 100% 93% 69% 32% 7% -
81 MIN Eric 100% 100% 98% 80% 41% 10% 1%
82 FORTUNE Alexander J. 100% 99% 92% 67% 31% 8% 1%
83 PALMA Matthew Dominic 100% 99% 88% 56% 20% 3% -
84 WU Jerry 100% 100% 95% 77% 44% 14% 2%
85 GOOR Julian 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 17%
86 LIN Michael 100% 96% 74% 33% 7% -
87 PO Oliver 100% 94% 69% 32% 8% 1%
88 KLOTZ Isaiah 100% 91% 50% 11% 1% -
89 GAO William 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 11% 1%
90 FREEDMAN Samuel E. 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 49% 10%
91 HO Jia Le Sean 100% 100% 96% 78% 42% 11% 1%
92 TSAI Max W. 100% 99% 82% 41% 10% 1% -
93 ZHANG Yun Isaac 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 41% 10%
94 GONG Benjamin 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 20% 3%
95 LIN James G. 100% 100% 99% 88% 54% 17% 2%
96 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. 100% 97% 79% 44% 13% 2% -
96 LIU Eric Y. 100% 97% 81% 48% 18% 3% -
96 LI Avery Peihong 100% 98% 84% 48% 12% 1% -
96 FINLEY Dylan 100% 86% 50% 17% 3% - -
100 NAGER Noah 100% 99% 92% 71% 37% 11% 1%
101 IVANENKO Alex 100% 95% 45% 6% - - -
102 ELWOOD Sebastian F. 100% 95% 74% 40% 13% 2% -
103 TSIMIKLIS Yanni 100% 97% 80% 43% 10% 1%
104 ORVANANOS Jorge 100% 99% 83% 42% 9% 1%
105 BERK Theodore 100% 99% 71% 27% 5% -
106 WONG Garrick G. 100% 99% 88% 58% 22% 3%
107 LEE Lukas 100% 92% 55% 13% 1% -
108 ZHAI Jeffrey 100% 100% 98% 85% 40% 5%
108 KLYCZEK Andrew 100% 92% 51% 13% 1% -
110 ZHOU Oscar J. 100% 99% 88% 52% 13% 1%
111 SYOMICHEV Gleb A. 100% 76% 32% 7% 1% -
112 KIM Ryan Y. 100% 95% 72% 37% 11% 2% -
112 TORRES Treston 100% 96% 73% 34% 8% 1% -
114 REYES Omar 100% 100% 96% 69% 28% 5% -
115 SIMA Congyu Josh 100% 99% 87% 54% 19% 3% -
116 SISINNI Riccardo 100% 84% 46% 14% 2% - -
117 OROSZLAN Daniel 100% 95% 74% 40% 13% 2% -
118 LEE Jacob 100% 95% 72% 36% 10% 1% -
119 LISONDRA Niko 100% 93% 65% 28% 6% 1% -
120 ANDERSON Jacob 100% 88% 53% 18% 3% - -
120 PORRAS Cristian 100% 99% 88% 57% 22% 4% -
122 JAIN Aditya 100% 100% 97% 78% 38% 7%
123 LEE Aidan 100% 99% 93% 68% 30% 5%
124 HOSKERI Anik S. 100% 91% 61% 24% 5% -
125 TRAUGOT Owen G. 100% 94% 65% 26% 5% -
126 LI Matthew 100% 98% 80% 43% 13% 2% -
127 DOCTOR Aidan L. 100% 99% 93% 70% 35% 10% 1%
127 TANG Owen S. 100% 99% 89% 63% 28% 7% 1%
129 WECHSLER Jacob 100% 89% 57% 23% 5% 1% -
130 MUSHER Benjamin J. 100% 99% 89% 58% 21% 3% -
130 DRESSEL Jet 100% 99% 69% 17% 2% - -
132 PITERBARG Maxim 100% 92% 55% 18% 3% - -
133 LIM Lance Jeremiah 100% 76% 32% 6% - - -
134 WONG Adrian 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 26% 4%
135 DESHMUKH Arjun 100% 84% 49% 17% 3% - -
136 LEWIS Akhil 100% 97% 71% 32% 7% 1% -
137 GONZALEZ Matthew 100% 58% 18% 3% - - -
138 STRUGAR Marcus A. 100% 100% 100% 94% 60% 19% 2%
139 KIM Jackson 100% 88% 53% 17% 2% -
140 ORONOWICZ Jakub 100% 77% 36% 9% 1% -
141 DAVIDSON Elliot 100% 70% 25% 4% - -
142 SEAL Maximus R. 100% 85% 47% 14% 2% - -
143 WU Lucas 100% 82% 42% 11% 2% - -
144 RNO Kyler 100% 38% 6% 1% - - -
145 FU Samuel Y. 100% 99% 95% 77% 44% 15% 2%
146 ZHEN Ethan 100% 99% 86% 53% 18% 2% -
147 BURBERRY Alan 100% 87% 47% 14% 2% - -
148 XU Xinhao ( Sonny) 100% 82% 44% 14% 2% - -
149 TANG Albert 100% 55% 15% 2% - - -
150 LI Arvin 100% 92% 63% 26% 6% 1% -
151 HUANG Eythan 100% 86% 48% 13% 1% - -
152 FRANK Amir 100% 23% 2% - - - -
153 LIU Ryan 100% 95% 30% 4% - - -
154 LEE Jacob J 100% 99% 88% 57% 21% 3%
155 DORE Davis 100% 79% 35% 7% 1% -
156 BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. 100% 64% 22% 4% - - -
157 ORLOV Dmitriy 100% 80% 40% 10% 1% -
158 EUH Jason 100% 45% 9% 1% - - -
159 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 100% 60% 18% 3% - -
160 SANTOS Carlos R. 100% 91% 59% 20% 3% - -
161 YOUNG Owen 100% 47% 9% 1% - -
162 LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden 100% 97% 83% 54% 22% 5% -
163 RIPA Joseph K. 100% 4% - - - -
163 AGRAWAL Niki 100% 36% 5% - - -
165 GORBACHEV Alexander 100% 97% 80% 45% 16% 3% -
165 PIESNER Zachary C. 100% 90% 58% 23% 5% - -
167 ORTEGA Jose-Arnel 100% 94% 49% 11% 1% - -
168 KHER Roan 100% 90% 57% 22% 4% - -
169 TANG August L. 100% 80% 39% 10% 1% - -
169 CHOE Jayden K. 100% 71% 30% 7% 1% - -
169 COUFAL Christian 100% 15% 1% - - - -
172 ZHAO Bowen 100% 45% 10% 1% - - -
173 EDISON Ansel 100% 39% 7% 1% - - -
174 MARTIN William 100% 10% - - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.