Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 2 | KIM Juni C. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
| 3 | VERMEULE Spencer | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 3 | IYOKI Kent | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 54% | |
| 5 | GONZALEZ II Ricky G. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 6 | SZABO Domonkos | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 7 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 8 | YAN yuheng | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 9 | TOWNSEND Avery S. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 10 | RONG Yao | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
| 11 | ROBINSON Riley | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 12 | LEHR William D. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 22% |
| 13 | SILVERS Noah E. | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
| 14 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 15 | LEE Alexander G. | 5% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 16 | GYURE Brayden H. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 17 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% | |
| 18 | THAYER Bryce | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | < 1% |
| 19 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 20 | OH Matthew M. | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | DAO Matthew M. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 12% |
| 22 | POPOVICI Maximilian P. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 23 | KOFROTH Zachary R. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | LIU Alexander | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 40% | 11% | |
| 25 | PRASAD Ankith | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 60% | |
| 26 | MOSES Alexander | - | 5% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
| 27 | IMREK Samuel A. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% |
| 28 | ZHANG YuJian | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 29 | WHELAN Thomas (Tony) | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 30 | RHYU Kozmo | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | HUANG Zijin | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 32 | FELDMAN Jaemin | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 33 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% |
| 34 | LIVERANT Skyler J. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 46% | 30% |
| 35 | LIN Ryan | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
| 36 | PARKER Riley D. | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | PHILLIPS Jeffrey T. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 38 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 39 | GORIUNOV IVAN A. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
| 40 | HOLDERNESS Landon | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 41 | NIEBERGALL Colin G. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 42 | LEI Jacob | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 12% | |
| 43 | MCGAW Julian E. | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 44 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 45 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 13% | |
| 46 | JIN Nicholas | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 4% | |
| 47 | MANZ Hamilton R. | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 49 | WANG Kevin de-tai | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 50 | INSLER Ethan C. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% |
| 51 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | GUO Joe | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 53 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 54 | CASTLE Aaron | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 56 | PARK Brian | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 57 | SANTORO Marcus M. | 28% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | CHUNG Thomas | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 59 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
| 60 | POCSVEILER Magor | 28% | 41% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | BUYANOV Nikita V. | 7% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 61 | SHIV Rishi | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | ZHANG Andrew | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 64 | MORGAN Cooper | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 65 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 66 | CHO Tyler H. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 67 | MORSE Tyler | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 68 | HERBEL Micah O. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 69 | HANRATTY Liam | - | 8% | 37% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 70 | HA Daniel | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 71 | JACKSON James | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 72 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 8% | 33% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 73 | ZHU Max | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 74 | USHER Alexander | 9% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 75 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 76 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 25% | 4% | |
| 77 | MCKEEVER Luca | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 78 | LIANG Aaron | 1% | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 79 | HERMANSON David B. | 13% | 45% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | GOLDMAN Rami | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 81 | SIMMONS Tristan A. | 45% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 82 | MOHEBI Saam | 7% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 83 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 2% | 23% | 46% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 84 | LEONE Charles D. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 85 | DINKINS Shuayb | 21% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | LIU Kyle | - | 5% | 29% | 43% | 20% | 3% | |
| 87 | PHAM Ian Q. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 88 | WONG Daniel | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 89 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 90 | BUHEIS Alexander I. | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 91 | RAWSON Nicholas | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 92 | PICK Ian | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 94 | DENNIS Ethan | 37% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 95 | GALIS Nicholas | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 96 | GALLANT Antoine | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | IMREK Elijah S. | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 98 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 21% | 45% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 41% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 100 | DYER Ian E. | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 101 | KIM Benjamin I. | 5% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 102 | DIB Aaniss | 20% | 45% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 103 | LOU Kevin | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 104 | NICHOLS JR Cortez | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 105 | PAI Nandan K. | 47% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 105 | RYAN Seth C. | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.