Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - |
2 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
3 | VERMEULE Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
3 | IYOKI Kent | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | |
5 | GONZALEZ II Ricky G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
6 | SZABO Domonkos | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
7 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
8 | YAN yuheng | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
9 | TOWNSEND Avery S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
10 | RONG Yao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% |
11 | ROBINSON Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% | |
12 | LEHR William D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 22% |
13 | SILVERS Noah E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
14 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% |
15 | LEE Alexander G. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | 1% | |
16 | GYURE Brayden H. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
17 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% | |
18 | THAYER Bryce | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 8% | < 1% |
19 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
20 | OH Matthew M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
21 | DAO Matthew M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 12% |
22 | POPOVICI Maximilian P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
23 | KOFROTH Zachary R. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
24 | LIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 11% | |
25 | PRASAD Ankith | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | |
26 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 22% | 3% | |
27 | IMREK Samuel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 11% |
28 | ZHANG YuJian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
29 | WHELAN Thomas (Tony) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
30 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
31 | HUANG Zijin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
32 | FELDMAN Jaemin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
33 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
34 | LIVERANT Skyler J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 30% |
35 | LIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
36 | PARKER Riley D. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | |
37 | PHILLIPS Jeffrey T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
38 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
39 | GORIUNOV IVAN A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
40 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
41 | NIEBERGALL Colin G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
42 | LEI Jacob | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 12% | |
43 | MCGAW Julian E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
44 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
45 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 13% | |
46 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 4% | |
47 | MANZ Hamilton R. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
48 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
49 | WANG Kevin de-tai | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
50 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 6% |
51 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
52 | GUO Joe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
53 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
54 | CASTLE Aaron | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
55 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
56 | PARK Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
57 | SANTORO Marcus M. | 100% | 72% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
57 | CHUNG Thomas | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
59 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 4% | |
60 | POCSVEILER Magor | 100% | 72% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
61 | BUYANOV Nikita V. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
61 | SHIV Rishi | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
63 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
64 | MORGAN Cooper | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
65 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
66 | CHO Tyler H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
67 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
68 | HERBEL Micah O. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
69 | HANRATTY Liam | 100% | 100% | 92% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
70 | HA Daniel | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - |
71 | JACKSON James | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
72 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 100% | 92% | 59% | 19% | 2% | - | |
73 | ZHU Max | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | |
74 | USHER Alexander | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
75 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
76 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 29% | 4% | |
77 | MCKEEVER Luca | 100% | 80% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
78 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
79 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 87% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
80 | GOLDMAN Rami | 100% | 90% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
81 | SIMMONS Tristan A. | 100% | 55% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
82 | MOHEBI Saam | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
83 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 100% | 98% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
84 | LEONE Charles D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
85 | DINKINS Shuayb | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
86 | LIU Kyle | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 22% | 3% | |
87 | PHAM Ian Q. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
88 | WONG Daniel | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
89 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
90 | BUHEIS Alexander I. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
91 | RAWSON Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
92 | PICK Ian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
94 | DENNIS Ethan | 100% | 63% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
95 | GALIS Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
96 | GALLANT Antoine | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
97 | IMREK Elijah S. | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
98 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 100% | 79% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
99 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 59% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
100 | DYER Ian E. | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
101 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
102 | DIB Aaniss | 100% | 80% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
103 | LOU Kevin | 100% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
104 | NICHOLS JR Cortez | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
105 | PAI Nandan K. | 100% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
105 | RYAN Seth C. | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.