Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
| 2 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
| 3 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 3 | DENNIS Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 5 | CUI Oscar (Bo Lang) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% | |
| 6 | LI Jalen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
| 7 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 8 | SPINA Joseph B. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 9 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 14% |
| 10 | GALLO James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
| 11 | BOUMEDIENNE Sami | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 33% |
| 12 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 13 | JUN Jaywu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 25% |
| 14 | TREBON Hayden | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% | |
| 15 | LOISEAU Eliott | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
| 16 | XIANG Hongyi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 17 | LEHR William D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 24% |
| 18 | MAHESH Tarun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
| 19 | WANG Maxwell L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 20 | KIM Ian | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 21 | SAVORETTI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% | |
| 22 | NORMAN Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
| 23 | HEIM Bryce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 24 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
| 25 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 26 | SPITTLE Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 27 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 28 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 29 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 30 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 31 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | |
| 32 | DAVIS Jonah | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 34 | WEI Zheng (Jonny) | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 35 | SHEN Max | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 36 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% | |
| 37 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 38 | NATSVLISHVILI John Vano | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 39 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 40 | NORTH Alexander M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 41 | WANG Trontour | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 42 | ZHENG Alan H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 43 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | WANG Tristan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 45 | FERNANDEZ Santiago Martin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 46 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% | |
| 47 | NGUYEN Tate | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
| 48 | HEADRICK Lance | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 49 | HU Anton | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | MING Nathan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 51 | LIU Felix | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 52 | ZHU Eric | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 53 | WEI Michael | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 54 | MCADOO Declan | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 55 | LIU Dylan Y. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 55 | JORDAN Anton | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 57 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 58 | GORTI Agustya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
| 59 | LIN Harrison | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 60 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 61 | LI Zachary | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | SHA Michael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 63 | STCLAIR Jake | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 64 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 65 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 66 | KIM Byung | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | |
| 67 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
| 68 | HARR Carver | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 69 | AHMED saheer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 70 | CHAI Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 22% |
| 71 | XIAO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 13% | |
| 72 | REDDY Arya | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 73 | XU Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 41% | 11% |
| 74 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 74 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 76 | ZENG Zihan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 77 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 78 | SCHARF Ryan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 79 | WATT Darren | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 80 | BERKOWITZ Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 81 | WEAVER Neil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 82 | DU SHUNYU K. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 83 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 84 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 85 | YU Hunter | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 86 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 87 | WOLFSOHN Peleg | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 88 | GARRISON Andrew T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 20% | |
| 89 | PEDERSEN Christopher C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 90 | FENG du | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 91 | TORRES Gianni | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 92 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 93 | SILVERS Ari | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 94 | EVERS Gabriel | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 95 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 96 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 97 | BROWN Jacob (Jake) G. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 98 | JEON Hwidong | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 99 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 99 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 101 | NA Larry | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 102 | SONG Troy | 100% | 93% | 69% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 103 | TORRES Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 104 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 105 | LIU Noah | 100% | 92% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 106 | FAN Beichen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
| 107 | RACHEL Dylan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 108 | FU Leon | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 109 | LIN Kason | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 110 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 111 | DILLE Jackson K. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 112 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 113 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 114 | TAM Ethan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 115 | STETSON Jahaan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 116 | CHUNG Joshua | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 117 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 118 | HANNON Owen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 119 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 120 | SARIKONDA Akhil | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 121 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 122 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 123 | QUITORIANO Jonathan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 124 | OSTIGUY Cameron | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 125 | CHOI Aleksey | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 126 | MA Bochen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 127 | CHANG Shane | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 128 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 129 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 130 | GULLO Kenji Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 7% |
| 131 | JUNG Elliot | 100% | 84% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 132 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 133 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 134 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 92% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 135 | BYARS John | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 136 | PAN Colin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 137 | RICHARDSON Ray | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 138 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
| 139 | WANG Aidan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 140 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 141 | WU Marcus | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 142 | CLICK Tristan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 143 | PENG Gregory | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 144 | MILLER Jonathan | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 145 | HAN Ethan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 146 | BERNSTEIN Matthew B. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 7% | |
| 147 | MENDOZA Zander | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 148 | KIRSCH Adam J. | 100% | 85% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 149 | ELANGO SriVaaikuntesh | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 150 | PAK Joel | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 151 | EVANS Grant | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 152 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 152 | ZHAO Zidong | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.