November NAC

Junior Men's Foil

Saturday, November 11, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Fort Worth Convention Center - Fort Worth, TX, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ZHANG Daniel D. - - - - - 8% 92%
2 UM Ethan A. - - - - 2% 20% 78%
3 CHEN Allen - - - - 1% 17% 81%
3 RUSADZE Nickolas - - - - 5% 32% 62%
5 DESERANNO Jeidus - - - 1% 8% 34% 56%
6 ONIK Elijah T. - - - 1% 9% 37% 53%
6 ROSE Ben - - 1% 10% 32% 40% 16%
8 GRAHAM Roy J. - - - - 5% 33% 62%
9 SINGH Dayaal - - - 1% 7% 35% 57%
10 FUKUDA Renzo K. - - - - 4% 27% 69%
11 KIM Yonjae - - - 1% 8% 36% 56%
12 BURKE Spencer W. - - - - 4% 28% 67%
13 STANLEY Mason B. - - - 1% 9% 36% 53%
14 SISINNI Riccardo - - - 3% 19% 46% 33%
15 TIYA BIAYA K. - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
16 TRAUGOT Owen G. - - 2% 14% 36% 36% 12%
17 SIU Aiden - - - 1% 11% 44% 44%
18 DAI Jonathan T. - - - 3% 19% 47% 31%
19 LEE Aidan - - - - 6% 31% 63%
20 JEON Caleb A. - - - 1% 11% 40% 48%
20 WOO Christian - - 1% 5% 23% 43% 28%
20 HE Xiangrui - 1% 7% 29% 40% 20% 3%
23 LEE Jacob J - - - 1% 10% 39% 51%
24 HUTH Mitchell - - - 1% 7% 33% 60%
25 LYU Weiqiao Victor - - - 5% 21% 43% 31%
26 DIERKS Kian - - 2% 23% 50% 25%
27 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) - - - 1% 7% 35% 58%
28 LI Richard - - - - 6% 31% 63%
29 KIM Ryan Y. - - - 2% 17% 45% 36%
30 LO Conrad - - - - 5% 30% 64%
31 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - - 1% 8% 38% 54%
32 YANG Luao - - - - 2% 20% 79%
33 XU Xinhao ( Sonny) - 2% 15% 38% 34% 9% 1%
34 LI Owen - - 1% 9% 39% 51%
35 KAO Castor T. - - - - 5% 30% 65%
35 LI Eric - - - 6% 28% 45% 21%
37 SONG Aiden S. - - - - 8% 38% 54%
37 LU Yikai - - 1% 11% 36% 42% 10%
39 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - - - 1% 7% 37% 55%
39 SADOVSKY Leor B. - - 1% 10% 31% 40% 18%
41 WU Alexander - - - 1% 12% 42% 45%
42 BANERJEE ANUP - - - 1% 10% 39% 50%
43 ELWOOD Sebastian F. - - - 10% 40% 41% 9%
44 LUH Ethan K. - - 1% 6% 28% 49% 16%
44 ZHAI Jeffrey - - - 3% 22% 51% 24%
46 KNIZHNIK David - - 1% 6% 27% 43% 22%
47 BAS Liam - - - 1% 6% 35% 58%
47 MIALL Steven A. - - 3% 19% 39% 31% 8%
49 DESHMUKH Arjun - - - 5% 27% 49% 19%
50 LEWIS Akhil - - 1% 9% 34% 43% 12%
50 LING Eddie - 1% 9% 30% 40% 18% 2%
52 DEGROOT Blake - 1% 5% 21% 39% 30% 5%
53 XU Andy P. - 5% 21% 37% 28% 8% 1%
54 KLOTZ Isaiah - 2% 16% 35% 33% 13% 2%
55 GOOR Julian - - - 1% 9% 41% 49%
56 CANLAS Nathan - - - 5% 23% 44% 28%
57 XIAO Ethan J. - - - - 5% 32% 63%
58 TIKHAEV Alexander - 2% 14% 35% 36% 13% 1%
59 FORTUNE Alexander J. - - 3% 16% 41% 36% 4%
60 BALL James T. - - 1% 10% 32% 43% 14%
61 VALOUEV Aleksey - - 5% 25% 43% 24% 3%
62 LEE Eugene - 35% 44% 18% 3% - -
63 SHIN Joshua J. - - 3% 18% 40% 32% 7%
64 DOCTOR Aidan L. 1% 7% 26% 37% 23% 5% -
65 BRUK Peter J. - - - - 5% 31% 63%
66 CO Dylan - - 2% 15% 38% 35% 10%
67 COELHO Cristiano P. - - 1% 7% 29% 45% 18%
68 MATSAKH Philip - 1% 6% 25% 42% 24% 2%
69 FREEDMAN Samuel E. - - - 5% 23% 44% 28%
70 SENIC Lucas - - 4% 23% 44% 27% 1%
71 JAIN Aditya - - 1% 8% 30% 42% 19%
71 XIAO Enoch A. - - - - 2% 20% 78%
73 TANG Owen S. - - 2% 11% 32% 39% 16%
74 PO Oliver - 1% 6% 26% 40% 23% 5%
75 GAO William - - 2% 13% 34% 38% 13%
76 LIN Michael - - 4% 19% 41% 33% 3%
77 BING Charles - - - 6% 26% 46% 22%
77 SONG Austin - 7% 31% 40% 18% 3% -
77 TSIMIKLIS Yanni - - 1% 9% 32% 45% 13%
80 GODZHIK Zachary - - 1% 9% 41% 50%
81 XU Jia Bao (Bowen) - - 1% 15% 46% 38%
82 DETERING Julian - 1% 10% 36% 42% 11%
83 WONG Jackson - 8% 34% 43% 13% 1%
84 RASMUSSEN Sage - 2% 13% 33% 36% 15% 2%
85 ORR Spencer - - 5% 27% 44% 21% 3%
86 GRIFFITH JACK - - - 2% 15% 44% 39%
87 WONG Adrian - - 3% 16% 35% 34% 11%
88 LI Matthew - 2% 17% 43% 30% 7% -
89 PARK Jason B. - 1% 7% 26% 40% 23% 3%
90 WU Trevor - 6% 28% 39% 21% 4% -
91 PORRAS Cristian - - 2% 12% 36% 40% 11%
92 KEE Andrew L. - - - 11% 41% 39% 8%
92 NGUYEN Martin - - 5% 24% 41% 26% 2%
94 LIU Zixian (Aaron) - 7% 27% 38% 23% 5% -
94 BUDOVSKYI Borys - 2% 12% 29% 35% 19% 3%
96 TAHOUN Mostafa - 2% 13% 36% 34% 13% 2%
97 CHENG Ethan 1% 8% 30% 38% 19% 3% -
98 WANG Rory 3% 20% 37% 29% 10% 1% -
99 HUANG Eythan - 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
100 GONG Benjamin - - 5% 20% 36% 30% 9%
101 JIANG Owen - - 4% 19% 39% 32% 5%
102 ELKOUSY Laith H. - 2% 11% 32% 38% 16% 2%
102 QIAN Jason H. - - 2% 11% 34% 42% 10%
104 GERVAIS Joel - - 1% 11% 37% 39% 11%
105 CHIN Julian S. - - 3% 15% 37% 37% 8%
105 SONG Noel - 2% 15% 37% 35% 10% 1%
107 LEE Jonah - 2% 13% 34% 34% 15% 2%
108 DERRICK Blake - 3% 19% 38% 31% 9% 1%
109 HOOSHI Dylan M. - - - 3% 19% 48% 31%
110 HOBSON Aaron K. - - 4% 23% 48% 23% 3%
111 FANHAIJI Musitafa - 3% 18% 40% 30% 8% 1%
112 CHEN Kyle P. 3% 21% 38% 27% 9% 1% -
113 WYMAN Julian - - 4% 23% 51% 21%
114 HAN Changhee - 3% 20% 43% 29% 5%
115 SIMA Congyu Josh - 1% 8% 26% 39% 23% 3%
116 CHEN Charlie Tian-You - 3% 18% 38% 31% 9% 1%
117 WEI Qiancheng (Matt) - 1% 9% 31% 40% 17% 2%
118 LI Aaron - 3% 20% 43% 28% 6% -
119 KIAYIAS Aris 1% 9% 28% 36% 21% 5% -
120 CANO Marcos E. - 1% 11% 32% 37% 17% 2%
121 ZHANG Yun Isaac - - 3% 16% 36% 34% 11%
122 MA Andrew - 1% 9% 29% 39% 20% 2%
123 WUJASTYK Leon 1% 9% 29% 36% 20% 4% -
124 LE Jacob W. - 1% 9% 28% 39% 20% 2%
124 LEE Brendan 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 8% 1%
126 MURRAY Maximo - - 1% 13% 39% 39% 8%
127 LIU Derek - 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
128 FENG Michael 3% 24% 41% 26% 6% 1% -
129 LIN James G. - - 2% 13% 37% 39% 8%
130 KASI Sanjay - - - - 2% 21% 76%
131 PARK Rion 1% 11% 31% 35% 17% 3% < 1%
132 LEE Chris - - 2% 13% 35% 40% 9%
132 LEE Christopher T. - 3% 17% 37% 32% 11% 1%
134 LOVE Aaron - - 1% 9% 33% 46% 11%
135 PARK Sky 2% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
136 LEE Jacob - - 4% 19% 40% 31% 6%
137 RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen - 9% 36% 37% 15% 2% -
138 GATZA Logan - - 6% 29% 44% 19% 2%
139 MUSHER Benjamin J. - 1% 8% 27% 38% 22% 4%
140 LI Matthew - - 1% 8% 30% 42% 19%
141 AHN Jun - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 23%
142 YOON Junhyeok 8% 34% 38% 17% 3% - -
143 DINSAY Kristjan - 1% 7% 27% 41% 23% 2%
144 LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden - 3% 20% 40% 29% 8% 1%
145 LEVY Jacob 1% 14% 36% 34% 13% 2% -
145 AKYAMAC Bora - 2% 16% 37% 33% 10% 1%
147 WONG Garrick G. - - 4% 21% 40% 29% 5%
147 CORTRIGHT Skipper - 3% 18% 39% 31% 9% -
149 PAI Lakshan K. - 3% 16% 34% 33% 13% 1%
150 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. - - 3% 17% 42% 31% 7%
150 WU Alber Y. - 2% 11% 30% 37% 18% 2%
150 NICOLETTI Luca - 3% 19% 37% 30% 10% 1%
153 BAE Kevin - - - 6% 26% 44% 24%
153 YOON DYLAN - 1% 10% 33% 39% 15% 2%
155 LAK Isaac - 1% 8% 29% 40% 19% 3%
156 ZHANG Aaron 1% 13% 38% 36% 11% 1% -
156 YI William 1% 17% 38% 31% 11% 2% -
158 WANG Ethan 3% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
159 GUO Justin - 2% 14% 34% 36% 13% 1%
160 KIM Jackson - 4% 19% 35% 30% 11% 1%
160 REEVES Liam 1% 5% 21% 36% 28% 8% 1%
162 LI Jiaan - - 1% 6% 26% 43% 25%
163 CHENG Jonathan - 1% 12% 46% 34% 7%
164 SAH Steven 3% 37% 43% 15% 2% -
165 LIU Ethan - 2% 12% 30% 35% 18% 3%
166 STRUGAR Marcus A. - 3% 15% 34% 33% 13% 2%
167 TSAO Lukas 1% 7% 23% 36% 25% 8% 1%
168 XIAO EDWARD - - 1% 8% 30% 42% 19%
169 DORAN Wesley C. - - 2% 14% 41% 35% 8%
170 MIN Eric - - 2% 14% 38% 39% 7%
170 ACHILOV Sayid - 1% 7% 29% 40% 20% 3%
172 WONG Antonio - 4% 18% 36% 31% 9% 1%
173 DAVIDSON Elliot - 1% 10% 32% 39% 16% 1%
174 SONG Leonardo T. - - - 1% 7% 35% 57%
175 LAM Nicolas - 35% 43% 19% 3% - -
175 WANG Brian - 10% 31% 37% 18% 4% -
177 KIM Daniel Y. 2% 23% 43% 26% 6% - -
178 ALONSO Vinicius 1% 17% 40% 31% 9% 1% -
179 KIM Andrew J. - 1% 5% 23% 40% 26% 6%
179 TAN Christien - 5% 21% 37% 28% 8% 1%
181 BRAIZINHA Thomas 7% 32% 39% 18% 3% - -
182 YAP Nathan - 15% 39% 33% 11% 1% -
183 GUTH Joseph 2% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2% -
184 SANTOS Carlos R. 3% 20% 39% 28% 9% 1% -
184 WU Alistair - 5% 23% 40% 26% 6% -
186 REYES Omar - 1% 9% 28% 37% 20% 4%
186 ZHANG Matthew 1% 32% 42% 20% 4% - -
188 LIPPMAN Sam - 1% 10% 51% 32% 7% -
189 SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden 5% 25% 38% 24% 7% 1% -
190 MEJIA MATTHEW D. - - 4% 19% 38% 32% 7%
190 LI Toby 3% 21% 38% 28% 8% 1% -
192 YE Gordon 37% 41% 18% 4% - - -
193 SUN Ryan 8% 31% 39% 18% 4% - -
194 LI Richard 4% 24% 44% 24% 4% - -
194 PALMA Nathan Anthony - 12% 37% 37% 12% 1% -
196 TANG August L. - - 6% 26% 44% 23% 1%
196 MA Bryant 1% 7% 24% 38% 25% 6% -
198 ARIZA Abraham J. 4% 21% 37% 28% 10% 1% -
199 GATRELL Mitchell E. - 2% 12% 30% 36% 18% 2%
199 SHAO Eric 2% 15% 36% 32% 12% 2% -
201 ZHEN Ethan - 3% 17% 39% 32% 8% 1%
201 WONG Yuheng Isaac 1% 15% 37% 33% 11% 2% -
203 TALASILA Arush 2% 17% 37% 31% 11% 1% -
204 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - 2% 13% 31% 35% 17% 2%
205 KIM Minhyeok - 3% 19% 37% 30% 10% 1%
206 TANG Albert - 1% 10% 32% 40% 16% 1%
206 BOYKO Miles 3% 19% 40% 29% 8% 1% -
208 BI Ryan 14% 35% 33% 15% 3% - -
209 MCISAAC Finn 1% 7% 25% 37% 23% 5% -
210 LEE Jayden J. 3% 27% 44% 22% 4% - -
211 WANG Brayden 7% 33% 41% 16% 3% - -
212 ANDRIC Borna 2% 19% 37% 29% 11% 2% -
213 PRASANNA Advaith - 5% 23% 40% 26% 6% -
214 LO Preston - 5% 25% 41% 25% 5% -
215 JIMENEZ Naveen 7% 39% 38% 14% 2% - -
216 SHENG Dalton 1% 9% 34% 37% 16% 2% -
217 RAUTUREAU Hugo 3% 29% 40% 22% 5% 1% -
218 CHO Xzander 4% 42% 44% 9% 1% -
219 TANG Alexander L. - 15% 42% 32% 9% 1% -
220 LI Jett 1% 15% 39% 33% 11% 1% -
220 GAO Payton 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% - -
222 LIU William 3% 21% 45% 26% 5% - -
223 ROZALSKI Eli - 6% 29% 45% 17% 2% -
224 MORROW Brenden - 6% 27% 39% 22% 5% -
225 REICHEL Ezra 5% 29% 40% 22% 5% - -
226 EDWARDS Maxon 1% 9% 29% 38% 20% 4% -
227 LI Arvin - - 4% 19% 40% 33% 5%
228 KIM Harrison 7% 35% 40% 15% 2% - -
229 XIAO Bowen 1% 11% 32% 37% 16% 3% -
230 LEUNG Ethan - 4% 20% 39% 29% 7% -
230 PAN Henry - 3% 20% 40% 28% 8% 1%
232 KAPOOR Aayan 1% 10% 34% 37% 16% 2% -
233 LEUNG Jin 12% 37% 36% 14% 2% - -
234 FUKUDA Diego 1% 7% 26% 38% 22% 5% -
235 CAPRA Ethan 1% 11% 30% 35% 18% 4% -
236 LIGOS Alex M. - 5% 21% 38% 27% 8% 1%
237 CHENG Nathan - 1% 6% 24% 38% 25% 6%
238 GIDDENS James 2% 35% 43% 18% 3% - -
239 EDISON Ansel - 3% 19% 41% 30% 7% -
239 PINCHENG Yao 10% 35% 36% 15% 3% - -
239 HUANG Jonathan - 8% 29% 37% 20% 4% -
242 MATTOS Luis Felipe 26% 50% 20% 3% - - -
243 TAN Aidan - 7% 28% 40% 21% 4% -
243 XU Dinghui Ryan 41% 43% 14% 2% - - -
245 PITERBARG Maxim - 6% 27% 40% 23% 4% -
245 VISHAWADIA Jaimin 6% 36% 41% 15% 2% - -
247 BAE Eugene 1% 28% 43% 23% 5% - -
248 LI Samuel 1% 8% 31% 38% 19% 4% -
249 HOSKERI Anik S. - 1% 10% 31% 39% 17% 2%
249 YANG Dylan 14% 53% 27% 5% - - -
249 FOURNET-FAYARD Aldric 23% 45% 26% 6% - - -
252 CORTRIGHT Joshua C. 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1% -
252 LYNCH Owen C. 7% 32% 42% 17% 3% - -
254 WONG Evan 5% 28% 39% 22% 6% 1% -
255 KIM Adrian 1% 11% 46% 33% 8% 1% -
256 JI Aidan Y. - 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 6%
257 STRINGER David 3% 20% 37% 29% 10% 1% -
258 RAJ Jay 1% 8% 30% 39% 19% 3% -
259 YAO Bradley 6% 26% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
260 TSAY Jordan R. 19% 47% 27% 6% 1% - -
260 ORLOV Dmitriy 1% 12% 34% 36% 15% 2% -
260 HOLLIS Sean 6% 39% 47% 7% - - -
263 KIM Brian 4% 22% 39% 27% 7% 1% -
263 CHUANG Oscar 12% 36% 35% 14% 3% - -
265 CHEN Kelton 36% 43% 18% 3% - - -
265 SHI Dylan 56% 36% 7% 1% - - -
267 ZHANG Lucas 14% 42% 34% 9% 1% - -
267 PARKER Isaiah 17% 41% 31% 9% 1% - -
269 FINLEY Dylan - 4% 19% 37% 30% 9% 1%
270 LAO Kevin 42% 44% 13% 1% - - -
270 VANOYEN Dominick 7% 30% 40% 19% 4% - -
272 ANWEILER Nathan 68% 27% 4% - - - -
273 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas 1% 22% 45% 27% 5% -
274 ZHOU Ryan 4% 39% 46% 10% 1% -
275 PETERSON Matthew 30% 45% 21% 3% - -
276 ZHANG Jacob 10% 35% 39% 14% 2% -
277 PIERCE Cody 17% 42% 32% 8% 1% -
278 ZHAO Adam - 17% 41% 31% 10% 1% -
279 GOGOI Vir K. - 5% 25% 41% 24% 4% -
280 MAO Lucas - 10% 34% 37% 17% 3% -
281 SCHIENEMAN Valentine 6% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1% -
282 LIU Michael H. - 4% 19% 35% 30% 11% 1%
283 ORNELAS Matteo 33% 43% 20% 4% - - -
284 XU Ethan 2% 19% 38% 30% 9% 1% -
285 CHOI Ethan 6% 28% 38% 22% 5% - -
285 WANG Mason - 6% 22% 37% 27% 7% -
287 CLARK Benjamin 52% 38% 10% 1% - - -
288 QIU Zhaocheng 1% 15% 41% 34% 9% 1% -
289 SHANNON Jack 23% 49% 23% 4% - - -
290 CHAN Ian - 5% 27% 41% 22% 4% -
291 MCKINLEY Luke 18% 58% 21% 2% - - -
292 TAM Kyle 56% 35% 8% 1% - - -
292 MASSIMINO Andrew 5% 34% 40% 18% 3% - -
294 XIE Buster 6% 28% 38% 21% 6% 1% -
295 KENNEDY Michael 69% 27% 4% - - - -
295 MCKEE Calvin 50% 39% 10% 1% - - -
297 SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn 3% 26% 43% 24% 4% - -
298 ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan 9% 38% 37% 13% 2% - -
299 MARISI Gabriel 25% 47% 23% 5% - - -
300 ELKOUSY Zain al Din 8% 35% 41% 14% 2% - -
300 WEISS Mateo 13% 50% 34% 3% - - -
302 LING Carson Jr 32% 49% 16% 2% - - -
303 NICOLSON William 19% 43% 29% 8% 1% - -
304 IVANENKO Alex 4% 26% 42% 23% 5% - -
304 CHONG Tristan 42% 43% 14% 1% - - -
306 LEE Jayden 2% 40% 42% 15% 2% - -
306 ZHONG Maxwell 15% 43% 34% 8% 1% - -
308 JOHNSON Chance 2% 29% 41% 22% 5% 1% -
309 HSIAO Nicholas 5% 30% 40% 21% 5% - -
310 HUNTER Phillip 54% 36% 9% 1% - - -
311 ZAIDI Adil 15% 54% 26% 5% - - -
312 TSOI Spencer 54% 36% 9% 1% - - -
313 XIE Yimo 44% 41% 13% 2% - - -
314 FOY Grant 68% 28% 4% - - - -
315 WILLIAMS Connor J. < 1% 2% 11% 30% 38% 19% 1%
315 SRINIVASAN Vedant 2% 19% 40% 30% 8% 1% -
317 LI Avery Peihong 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 8% 1%
318 WARMERDAM Joseph 83% 16% 1% - - -
319 NOFZIGER Bennett 38% 47% 13% 2% - - -
319 BAI Brian 18% 43% 30% 8% 1% - -
319 MIRON Ioachim 45% 41% 13% 1% - - -
322 LIANG Ethan 62% 33% 4% - - - -
322 DENG David 52% 38% 9% 1% - - -
322 FRASER Rhys 75% 23% 2% - - - -
325 XU Brian 78% 20% 1% - - -
326 SIMON Luke 16% 50% 29% 5% - - -
326 ZMUDA Aiden 65% 30% 5% - - - -
328 RUBIN Max 5% 29% 39% 21% 5% - -
328 LIU Yinhong 32% 44% 19% 4% - - -
328 CHANG Nathan 37% 42% 17% 3% - - -
328 KIM Jonah 44% 40% 14% 2% - - -
328 DAI Christopher 42% 45% 12% 1% - - -
333 BARRETT Austin 31% 45% 20% 3% - - -
333 COSGROVE Jameson 50% 38% 10% 1% - - -
333 RAUTUREAU Arthur 22% 41% 27% 8% 1% - -
333 CHAN Joseph 24% 43% 26% 6% 1% - -
337 ZHUANG Chuanxuan 38% 42% 16% 3% - - -
337 ZENG Rick 36% 41% 18% 4% - - -
337 NISHIHIRA Tyler 75% 23% 2% - - - -
337 ZHANG Andrew 66% 31% 3% - - - -
337 MAVANI Krishna 46% 42% 11% 1% - - -
342 RODRIGUEZ Alejandro 67% 30% 2% - - - -
342 WILLEY Dakota 13% 57% 26% 3% - - -
344 YUE Jackson 35% 45% 17% 3% - - -
344 REID Wesley 94% 6% - - - - -
344 CREBBS Calvin 65% 31% 4% - - - -
347 CHUN Zachary 95% 5% - - - - -
348 ABRAMKIN Tim 84% 15% 1% - - - -
348 COSSROW Alex 66% 30% 4% - - - -
348 SEMLER Benjamin 68% 28% 4% - - - -
348 SUN Neo 99% 1% - - - - -
352 RAO Saathvik 87% 13% 1% - - - -
352 EGE Nathan 93% 7% - - - - -
354 CHUN Alexander 100% - - - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.