National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WHELAN Thomas (Tony) | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 25% |
2 | TOWNSEND Avery S. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
3 | GORIUNOV IVAN A. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
3 | RONG Yao | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
5 | PARK Ian C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
6 | GARCIA-ROGERS Lucas H. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 20% |
7 | LIU Kyle | - | 1% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 11% | |
8 | SHI Edric | - | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% |
9 | KIM Juni C. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
10 | INSLER Ethan C. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
11 | THAYER Bryce | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
12 | WIMMER Chandler M. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 11% |
13 | EKE Frank | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
14 | RHYU Kozmo | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 7% |
15 | DU Drake | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
16 | BUROVSKY Maxim | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
17 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% |
18 | WANG Kevin de-tai | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
19 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
20 | WU Jason | 2% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
21 | KIM Edward J. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
22 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 31% |
23 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 40% | 29% |
24 | HANRATTY Liam | - | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 2% |
25 | MORSE Tyler | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% |
26 | DYER Ian E. | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
27 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
28 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
29 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
30 | GOHEL Dayus T. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
31 | SHAH S Ayush | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% |
32 | LEONE Charles D. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
33 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
34 | BUYANOV Nikita V. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
35 | SOOMRO Adam A. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
36 | DIB Aaniss | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
37 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 4% | 17% | 30% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
38 | GATZA Logan | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
39 | LEE Noah | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% |
41 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
42 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
43 | GOLDFINE Ian J. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
43 | HERMANSON David B. | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
45 | CHAWLA Armaan | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | - |
46 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
47 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | - |
48 | DIECK Logan O. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
49 | KING Cameron | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
50 | BORODITSKY Ethan | - | - | 3% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 10% |
51 | LI Benjamin | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
52 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
53 | TUCKER Henry M. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
54 | AGAON Shawn | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
55 | ZENG Zihan | 3% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
56 | WHITMORE James C. | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
57 | DENNIS Ethan | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
57 | LIU Frank | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
59 | SALERNO Gaetano | - | 2% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
60 | LONCAR Luka E. | - | - | < 1% | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
61 | CANO Diego A. | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 5% |
62 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
63 | BARTCH Ethan L. | 31% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
64 | JANG Elliot | 2% | 16% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
65 | DIXON Thomas | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
66 | BANNEN Nicholas | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
67 | GLOGOWSKI Konrad | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
68 | TRIMMER Colin | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
69 | AGAON Ethan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
70 | LEE Shwan | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 42% | 14% | 1% |
71 | KIM Prestin | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
72 | NGUYEN Tate | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 1% |
73 | AKOCS Ethan | 16% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
74 | KOLOCIN John | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
75 | KOBI Samuel | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
76 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
77 | KROPP Jack | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
78 | MISHIMA Torata | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
79 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 21% | 53% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
80 | ROBERTS Magnus | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
81 | LEE Seungwon | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
82 | MILLER Daniel | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
83 | CAO Brad | 2% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
84 | DESTEFANO Julius | - | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
85 | ALTUVE Alejandro J. | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
87 | WEI Michael | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - |
88 | PINERO Jose J. | 12% | 43% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
89 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
90 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
91 | DURINGTON Wyatt S. | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
92 | ILYAS Zakariya | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
94 | BAKER Toby | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
95 | KELLER Jacob D. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
96 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
96 | ROYTBURD Samuel | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
98 | CAO Albert | 9% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
99 | CHENH Justin | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
100 | DURKIN Tristan E. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
101 | DIVERIS Joseph | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
102 | BOYKO Ryker | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
103 | CHEN Zhong Han | 6% | 33% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
104 | GORMAN Aaron | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
105 | STICHMAN chase | 13% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
106 | ZHANG Andy | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
107 | GIUSSANI Edoardo | 4% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
108 | HUGHES Enda | 12% | 39% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
109 | RAWSON Nicholas | < 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
110 | MARTIN Maddox | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.