Capitol Clash SYC & RCC with Non-Regional Veteran and Y8

Y-14 Men's Foil

Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 8:00 AM

National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIU Niles J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 78%
2 HAMILTON Bogdan A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 85% 39%
3 KIM Nicholas W. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 66%
3 BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 53% 12%
5 REALS Alden D. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 69% 25%
5 UM Ethan A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 35%
7 YU Vinni 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 56%
8 SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 27%
9 CHOUN Minwook (Sam) 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 39%
10 XIAO Ethan J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 52%
11 CHOY Lucas B. 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 68% 21%
12 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 38%
13 LEE Joshua 100% 100% 96% 77% 39% 8%
14 MUSHA John M. 100% 90% 56% 19% 3% -
15 SOSNOV David 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 40% 9%
16 BAS Liam 100% 100% 100% 95% 71% 31% 5%
17 LEE Chris 100% 100% 100% 99% 86% 46% 7%
17 DESERANNO Jeidus 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 67% 24%
19 GRIFFITH JACK 100% 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 4%
20 GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 76%
21 KIM Tei D. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 69%
22 MCCORD Clark 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 39%
23 DOCTOR Aidan L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 26%
24 ZHANG Henry C. 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 47% 11%
25 VASILIEV Sacha M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 56%
26 HUTH Mitchell 100% 100% 99% 91% 61% 23% 3%
27 CHAN Tyler 100% 100% 99% 91% 60% 21% 3%
28 PYO Michael M. 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 17% 1%
29 WEINKOPF William O. 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 60% 11%
30 ZHANG Andy W. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 60% 18%
31 REZNICK Nicholas J. 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 37% 6%
32 VERSTEELE Sander 100% 100% 100% 95% 69% 29% 5%
33 YEROKHIN Michael N. 100% 100% 100% 97% 77% 28%
33 LIANG Lixi (Henry) 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 57%
35 MARX Oscar L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 50%
36 GORBACHEV Alexander 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 20%
37 KOBAL Maximilian 100% 100% 98% 83% 49% 17% 2%
38 BOBROW Logan 100% 100% 100% 94% 71% 34% 7%
39 YANG Luao 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 49% 12%
40 LI Jiaan 100% 100% 99% 88% 59% 21% 2%
41 DAI Jonathan T. 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 12%
42 MION Lorenzo 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 66% 23%
43 PELOSKY Zack B. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 21%
44 BRUK Peter J. 100% 100% 98% 83% 48% 12%
45 PAE Jonathan L. 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 37%
45 KIM Yonjae 100% 100% 99% 92% 64% 23%
47 MURRAY Maximo 100% 100% 97% 79% 39% 4%
48 CHEN Allen 100% 100% 98% 86% 50% 15% 2%
49 BAE Kevin 100% 100% 100% 95% 71% 25% 2%
50 ZHAO Jason L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 15%
51 GRAHAM Roy J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 52%
52 KEE Andrew L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 86% 42% 7%
53 KLEIN Sebastian W. 100% 98% 87% 60% 28% 8% 1%
54 XIAO Enoch A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 21%
55 TIAN Aaron C. 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 24% 3%
56 FOGELSON Frederick J. 100% 100% 100% 94% 72% 33% 6%
57 FURST Matthew C. 100% 100% 96% 77% 39% 9% 1%
58 ALIMI Yacine A. 100% 100% 94% 70% 29% 4% -
59 KITAGAWA Eric S. 100% 98% 79% 41% 11% 1%
60 CHEN Andrew 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 11%
61 MURA Andre Erix 100% 98% 85% 53% 20% 4% -
62 FEDONCHIK Henry J. 100% 99% 81% 36% 8% 1% -
63 TOLBA Abdelrahman 100% 100% 99% 87% 55% 20% 3%
64 MENG Zhaoyi 100% 93% 59% 19% 3% -
65 ZHANG Yun Isaac 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 67% 21%
66 GERVAIS Joel 100% 100% 99% 95% 80% 48% 14%
67 WONG Adam L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 29%
68 LI Richard 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 27%
69 KWON Ethan 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 15% 2%
70 WU Alexander 100% 100% 97% 81% 45% 13% 1%
72 ACHILOV Sayid 100% 97% 80% 47% 16% 3% -
73 FU Yifan 100% 99% 91% 62% 24% 4%
74 ZHAO Jesse 100% 95% 67% 23% 2% -
75 ORVANANOS Jorge 100% 100% 93% 65% 27% 5%
76 ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. 100% 100% 92% 58% 16% 2%
77 ZELTSER Lawrence M. 100% 100% 95% 74% 38% 9% -
78 WEN George C. 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 37% 8%
78 GEOGHEGAN Ronan 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 20% 3%
80 GALLUCCI Charles John 100% 99% 91% 67% 31% 7% 1%
81 GOOR Julian 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 26% 3%
81 GISLER Benjamin B. 100% 93% 65% 25% 5% - -
83 QIU Daniel 100% 87% 51% 17% 3% - -
84 SICHITIU Alexander 100% 99% 90% 66% 31% 8% 1%
85 ZHAI Jeffrey 100% 97% 81% 48% 17% 3% -
86 GAO William 100% 99% 91% 55% 15% 1% -
87 LOVIN Vlad 100% 94% 69% 30% 6% - -
88 SURINGA William J. 100% 85% 49% 16% 3% - -
88 SONG Austin 100% 96% 78% 45% 15% 3% -
90 DAVIDSON Elliot 100% 70% 21% 2% - - -
91 CHENG Jonathan 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 20%
92 HONG ISSAC 100% 100% 92% 65% 26% 5% -
93 YAN Edward Tianshuo 100% 100% 94% 65% 24% 4% -
93 GARR James D. 100% 97% 78% 42% 13% 2% -
95 DOUGLAS Oscar M. 100% 100% 98% 87% 54% 18% 2%
96 GUO Sean 100% 100% 98% 84% 49% 15% 2%
97 ZHANG Evan 100% 99% 94% 74% 41% 13% 2%
97 CANO Diego A. 100% 100% 100% 65% 22% 4% -
99 OH SEAN 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 37% 7%
100 GATZA Logan 100% 100% 95% 75% 37% 8% -
101 TORRES Treston 100% 96% 73% 32% 6% -
102 PAE Brian L. 100% 100% 95% 73% 32% 4%
103 SYLVESTER William Z. 100% 97% 79% 45% 15% 2%
104 SONG Leonardo T. 100% 77% 27% 4% - -
105 BOOTSMA Shane-Anson 100% 97% 78% 36% 4% -
106 BELLUOMO David C. 100% 88% 51% 15% 2% -
107 JONES Theodore M. 100% 85% 44% 12% 1% - -
108 FREEDMAN Samuel E. 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 16% 1%
109 MILLER Aidan A. 100% 95% 73% 38% 12% 2% -
110 FOTENOS Noah T. 100% 86% 49% 15% 2% - -
111 GONG Benjamin 100% 100% 100% 89% 52% 15% 2%
112 WILLIAMS Connor J. 100% 83% 30% 5% - - -
113 LI Yao (Liam) 100% 96% 69% 30% 7% 1% -
114 REEVES Liam 100% 100% 93% 65% 25% 5% -
115 BUERGIN Aidan 100% 99% 90% 61% 26% 5% -
116 ZHOU Leon 100% 99% 86% 46% 10% 1% -
117 TAHOUN Mostafa 100% 100% 96% 72% 21% 2% -
118 KISS Phillip A. 100% 76% 35% 10% 1% - -
118 LI Jinghua E. 100% 95% 66% 20% 2% - -
120 TSIMIKLIS Yanni 100% 96% 71% 32% 7% 1%
121 BURGOS patrick 100% 91% 55% 15% 1% -
122 YU Jonathan J. 100% 98% 85% 50% 13% 1%
123 AHN Jun 100% 100% 96% 76% 34% 4%
124 WECHSLER Jacob 100% 93% 63% 25% 5% - -
125 PO Oliver 100% 100% 97% 78% 40% 11% 1%
126 LIU Eric Y. 100% 97% 81% 48% 17% 3% -
127 WONG Ethan 100% 45% 8% - - - -
128 DRESSEL Jet 100% 68% 21% 2% - - -
129 PALMA Matthew Dominic 100% 93% 63% 25% 5% 1% -
130 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. 100% 72% 30% 6% 1% -
131 TANG Owen S. 100% 99% 87% 54% 19% 3% -
132 WANG Waley 100% 100% 96% 79% 46% 15% 2%
133 XIANG Derrick 100% 88% 53% 19% 3% - -
134 ANTON Nathaniel 100% 100% 96% 75% 38% 10% 1%
135 CATINO Brennen 100% 100% 98% 87% 60% 25% 4%
136 BROWN Alexander R. 100% 92% 67% 33% 10% 2% -
137 BADLANI Dev 100% 60% 18% 3% - - -
138 CLICK Aiden 100% 32% 3% - - - -
139 CULLIVAN Justice 100% 96% 70% 29% 6% - -
140 WOODTHORPE Michael G. 100% 84% 26% 4% - - -
141 SCHREIBER Samuel S. 100% 98% 85% 52% 19% 3% -
142 FORTUNE Alexander J. 100% 68% 25% 4% - -
143 BASOK Nikita 100% 99% 86% 45% 9% 1%
143 LEE Lukas 100% 75% 32% 6% - -
145 LEWIS Akhil 100% 90% 54% 18% 3% - -
146 JI Aidan Y. 100% 95% 76% 42% 15% 3% -
147 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 100% 97% 78% 43% 13% 2% -
148 FERBER Oliver E. 100% 91% 59% 23% 5% 1% -
149 DE JAGER Robert 100% 40% 6% - - - -
150 KADAVIL Joshua 100% 87% 51% 17% 3% - -
151 BURGOS Jacob R. 100% 69% 23% 3% - - -
152 VIANNA Guilherme 100% 82% 27% 4% - - -
153 LEE Jacob 100% 95% 69% 29% 6% 1% -
155 WANG mason 100% 75% 33% 7% 1% - -
156 SOLDATOV Faddey 100% 97% 74% 19% 2% - -
157 SANDHU LERNER Armaan S. 100% 25% - - - - -
158 MORENO Derek M. 100% 71% 29% 6% 1% - -
159 CEDERQUIST zachary 100% 100% 96% 60% 20% 3% -
160 SLOUGH Sean 100% 60% 18% 3% - -
161 QIU Christopher 100% 76% 33% 7% 1% - -
161 ORR Spencer 100% 99% 93% 69% 33% 8% 1%
161 BUERGIN Lance 100% 75% 1% - - - -
164 TING Clement 100% 87% 52% 17% 3% - -
165 ALONSOZANA ANDREW G. 100% 51% 9% 1% - -
165 CHIN Ryan 100% 43% 8% 1% - -
167 DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. 100% 35% 3% - - - -
169 SANTOS Carlos R. 100% 93% 62% 21% 4% - -
170 POIROT Max 100% 41% 6% - - - -
171 LIU Ryan 100% 55% 14% 2% - - -
172 KOKE Matthew C. 100% 66% 16% 1% - - -
173 CHEN Kyle P. 100% 96% 74% 36% 8% 1% -
173 LEWIS Nikhil I. 100% 28% 3% - - - -
175 ROBBINS Tusker F. 100% 94% 65% 24% 4% - -
176 KAN Edward 100% 40% 5% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.