Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | IYOKI Kent | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% |
| 2 | PACYNA ATILLA | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
| 3 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% | ||
| 3 | ZHANG Andrew | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | ||
| 5 | PARK Ian C. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 6 | WIMMER Chandler M. | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 7 | TUCKER Henry M. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% |
| 8 | RHYU Kozmo | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 9 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 33% | 5% |
| 10 | KIM Edward J. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
| 11 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 12 | GYURE Brayden H. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 13 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 14 | BORODITSKY Ethan | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 16 | WU Byron | 17% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | ||
| 17 | JIN Nicholas | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 18 | CAO Brad | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
| 19 | PRASAD Ankith | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 20 | RAWSON Nicholas | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 21 | LEE Shwan | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 22 | LIEF Isaac R. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | MOON Nathan | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | LEE Noah | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 25 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 26 | STUBBLEFIELD Evan | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 27 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | ||
| 28 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | YU Jonathan J. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 30 | LI Benjamin | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 31 | CAO Albert | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 32 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 55% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | LEONE Charles D. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 34 | ILYAS Zakariya | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% | |
| 35 | ZENG Zihan | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 36 | BANNEN Nicholas | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 37 | KING Cameron | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 38 | QUINN Maloy S. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 39 | CHAWLA Armaan | 5% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 40 | HANRATTY Liam | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 41 | AKOCS Ethan | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 42 | DURKIN Tristan E. | - | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | KIM Prestin | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | KOTCHEN Peter Trammell | 4% | 28% | 43% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | MARGHUB Safi | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 46 | DIXON Thomas | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 47 | GOHEL Dayus T. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 48 | KROPP Jack | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | ||
| 51 | FU Ethan | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | GLOGOWSKI Konrad | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | SHARMA Om V. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ROYTBURD Samuel | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | MUN Chur-Yong | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | CHO Hyunseong | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | JANG Elliot | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | < 1% | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 60 | MORAN Joseph | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.