USA Fencing Baltimore SJCC Tournament

Junior Men's Épée

Saturday, February 29, 2020 at 8:00 AM

Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 SHENG Patrick Y. D D V V V D V V V V V V V 4.5 3 -1.5
2 LIU John D D V V V V V V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
3 ZHU Wilson V D V V V D V V V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
3 SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. V V V V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
5 SHARMA Sanil V D V V D V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
6 WALKER IV Weymouth D. D V V D V V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
7 XU Zitong (Evan) V V D D V V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
8 ZAFFT Maximo S. V V D V D D V V V V D 4.8 3 -1.8
9 LIU Alexander V V D V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
10 PERSAUD Daivik D V V V D V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
11 LEE Daniel Y. V V V D D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
12 ZHU Max D V V V V D V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
13 RHYU Kozmo V D V V D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
14 PRASAD Ankith V V V D D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
15 XIAN Ryan V V D D V V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
16 SMITH Nicholas S. D V D V V V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
17 INSLER Ethan C. V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
18 PAEK Alex J. V V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
19 KRONROD Tal V V V V D V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
20 TRAN Dai Long V V D V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
20 SITBON-TAYLOR Noe B. V D V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
22 ADLER Ethan M. V V V V D V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
23 LI Jeffrey D V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
24 HODGE Jaydon L. V V D V V V V V D 1.9 5 +3.1
25 TAE William G. V V V V V D V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
26 KIM Ethan J. V V V D V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
27 DOLMETSCH Max V V D V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
28 XIAO Zherui D D V V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
29 NOMANI Shibli D. D V D V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
30 LEE Timothy S. V V D V D D V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
31 SIVAKUMAR Ajit D V D V V D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
32 CHAWLA Armaan D D V V D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
33 GLAZ Nicholas S. V V V V V V D 3.7 6 +2.3
34 LEE Shwan V V V V D V D 3.4 5 +1.6
35 LONCAR Luka E. V D V V V V D 2.5 5 +2.5
36 SHAH S Ayush V V V V V D D 4.1 5 +0.9
37 CRANE Matthew T. V V V V D V D 2.8 5 +2.2
38 LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. V V V V V D V D 4.3 5 +0.7
39 ZHENG Hagen V V D V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
40 GATZA Logan V D V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
41 WIMMER Chandler M. V V D V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
42 JAYENDRA Chandrashekar D V V D V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
43 MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. V V D D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
44 DOAN Joseph M. V V V D V D V D 4.7 4 -0.7
44 BRENNAN Charles F. V D V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
46 KROPP Jack V V V D D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
47 KOBI Samuel D V V V V D V D 2.4 4 +1.6
48 PAK Charles D V V V V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
49 YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. D D V V V V D 1.8 3 +1.2
50 SOOMRO Adam A. V V D D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
51 O'HARA Keegan J. V V D V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
52 SHAH Maximilian A. D D V V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
53 GOHEL Dayus T. V D D D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
54 MOON Ryan Y. V D V D V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
55 JOSEPH William V D D D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
56 RA Jr. Daniel M. D D V D V V V D 4.7 3 -1.7
57 VAYSBUKH Konstantin V V D D V D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
58 HAN Andersen Y. D V D V V D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
59 KING Cameron D V V D V D V D 3.0 3 -
59 XIAN Riley V D V V D D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
61 PADHYE Siddhant D D D V D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
62 DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. D D D D V V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
63 NOH Ray D D D V V D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
64 CHU Allan D D D V D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
65 INSLER Gabriel C. V V D V D V D 4.3 4 -0.3
66 BAGHA Armin D V V V V D D 2.0 4 +2.0
67 HERMANSON David B. D V V V D V D 3.3 4 +0.7
68 ZHAO Luhan D V D V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
69 GLECKNER Aidan D V D D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
70 MORSE Tyler D V D D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
70 CHONG christopher V V D D V D D 2.7 3 +0.3
72 WU Byron D V V V D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
73 BEKKER Mitchel V V D V D D D 4.2 3 -1.2
74 SHIV Rishi V D D V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
75 LEE Seungwon D V V D D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
76 DISIMONE David Z. V D V D V D D 2.9 3 +0.1
77 GALBIATI Leonardo V D D D V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
78 SALISBURY Cary V V D D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
79 JEYOON Ryan S. D V V D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
80 TRIMMER Colin D D V V D D 2.4 2 -0.4
81 LI Jeffrey V D V D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
82 KIM William M. V D V D D D 3.2 2 -1.2
83 SJOSTEDT Jacob H. D D V V D D 3.9 2 -1.9
84 STUBBLEFIELD Alexander D D D V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
85 PICCUS Isaac S. D V D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
86 PARK Ian C. D V D D D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
87 FELDMAN Jaemin V D V D D D D 4.0 2 -2.0
88 WISNIEWSKI Bart D D V V D D D 2.7 2 -0.7
89 LU Sebastian X. D V D D D V D 2.0 2 -
90 MAENG Jake W. D D V V D D D 3.5 2 -1.5
91 KIM Dylan J. D V V D D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
92 PARK Frederick D D D D V V D 1.4 2 +0.6
93 HU Matthew V V D D D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
94 MURPHY Thomas P. V D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
95 STUBBLEFIELD Evan D D V D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
96 HE Lawrence D V D D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
97 KIM Ryan D D V D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
98 LING Jaden D D D D V D D 1.0 1 -
99 FURST Matthew C. D D D V D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
99 SUMMER Zachary D D D V D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
101 WANG Tristan D D D D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
102 LEONE III Charles D. D V D D D D D 3.3 1 -2.3
102 SAMMS-HAY Cameron V D D D D D D 1.0 1 -
104 GAO Daniel D D D V D D D 0.5 1 +0.5
105 CORDDRY Matthew D D D D D V D 0.7 1 +0.3
106 SALERNO Gaetano D D D D D D D 2.8 0 -2.8
107 MACARTY Jordan T. D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
108 REITINGER Luke M. D D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
109 THOMPSON Benjamin D D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
110 POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
111 GOLDMAN Isaac D D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
112 COUGHLIN Nolan E. D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
113 CIGLIANO Benjamin I. D D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
114 GARLAND Nathaniel D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
115 MILLER Kurt D D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.