Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
2 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
3 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
3 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 45% |
5 | LIEF Isaac R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
6 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
7 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% |
8 | CAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
9 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
10 | BORODITSKY Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 12% |
11 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
12 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% | |
13 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
14 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
15 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
16 | KIM Byung | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 5% |
17 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% |
18 | WU Byron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
19 | ZHAO corey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
20 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 3% |
21 | WIECHMANN Colin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 5% | |
22 | LOISEAU Eliott | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 2% | |
23 | BASOK Nikita | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
24 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 31% |
25 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
26 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
27 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
28 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | |
29 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 3% | |
30 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 7% |
31 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
32 | KNOX James | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
33 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% |
34 | JUN Jaywu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
35 | DUAN eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
36 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
37 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
38 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% |
39 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
40 | NATSVLISHVILI John Vano | 100% | 96% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
41 | SONN Rohan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
42 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% | |
43 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
44 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
45 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
45 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
47 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 7% |
47 | MAHESH Tarun | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
49 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
50 | NGUYEN Damien | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
51 | ZHU Eric | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
52 | WU Marcus | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - |
53 | DESTEFANO Julius | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% | |
54 | HAN Dongcheng | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
55 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
56 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
57 | CHOI Aleksey | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
58 | LEE Hudson | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
59 | WANG Zhixing (Daniel) | 100% | 94% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
60 | SONG Troy | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
61 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 100% | 90% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
62 | TEH Steven | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
63 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
64 | PAN Tristan | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
65 | ARAVIND Athreya | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
66 | SAVORETTI Francesco | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
67 | DAN Rex | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
68 | SINFUEGO Adrian | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
69 | FANG Hanning | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
70 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
70 | CAO Brad | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | |
72 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
73 | REDDY Arya | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
74 | NESTERCZUK Maddox W. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
75 | GONG Haixiang | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
76 | FENG du | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
77 | WANG Max S | 100% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
78 | KALKANIS George | 100% | 76% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
78 | ZOU Xianyang | 100% | 57% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
80 | ZHANG ethan | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
81 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
82 | LI Zachary | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
82 | HU Anton | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
84 | KIM Dylan | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
85 | CHOI Christian | 100% | 85% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
86 | WU Colin | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
87 | OSTIGUY Cameron | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
88 | JU Mingde | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
89 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
90 | XIONG Aaron | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
91 | BYUN Kevin | 100% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
92 | MADANI Faris | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
93 | TANG WanLi | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
94 | AMBRE Arnav | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.