New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Juni C. | - | - | 5% | 28% | 54% | 13% | |
| 2 | INSLER Ethan C. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 3 | WHELAN Thomas (Tony) | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% |
| 3 | JIN Alexander | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 5 | JONES Simon A. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 6 | RICUTA Laurentiu Florentin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 7 | VERMEULE Spencer | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 8 | LIEF Isaac R. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | SILVER Cameron | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 9 | LONCAR Luka E. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 11 | KOBI Samuel | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 12 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 13 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% | |
| 14 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 15 | HOLTZ Donovan K. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% |
| 16 | RHYU Kozmo | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 17 | JIN Owen | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 18 | GUI Runlin | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 19 | PARK Frederick | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | CHONG Christopher | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 21 | KIM William M. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 5% |
| 22 | WU Joseph | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 23 | KOKENGE Reid | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 24 | SOOMRO Adam A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 25 | GOHEL Dayus T. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 14% |
| 26 | ALFAIATE Lucas | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 27 | MELCHER Jack H. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 28 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
| 30 | CHEN Eric | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 31 | PRIHODKO Max | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 32 | KUMAR Aidan | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 33 | SIMPSON Patrick | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 34 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | 1% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 35 | KROPP Jack | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 36 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 37 | KIM Tei D. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | EKE Frank | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | LEE Noah | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 40 | PAPAVASSILIOU Christos | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | LANGTON Sawyer | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 42 | RICHARD Owen | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | FULLER George K. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
| 44 | FELDMAN Jaemin | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 45 | BORATIN Daniel I. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 46 | KUDRIAVTCEV Sergei | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 47 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 48 | STALL-RYAN Jonathan | 8% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | SHEN Max | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | WU Jonathan | 5% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | BEZRODNOV Michael | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 52 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 53 | KIM Byung | 1% | 12% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 54 | SPRINGER Michael | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 55 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 56 | GAO Daniel | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 57 | BELLIVEAU Raven C. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 58 | BOYNTON Zachariah (Zach) G. | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 59 | HE Lawrence | 6% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 60 | GERSEN Jacob | 21% | 45% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | PAN Colin | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 62 | RYAN Joshua P. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 63 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 64 | SWANSON Lars M. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
| 65 | DIPAOLA Steven M. | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 66 | MORSE Tyler | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 67 | HERMANSON David B. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 68 | JENNINGS Adin | 17% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | SKAALAND Will | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 70 | PEDERSEN Christopher C. | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 71 | SVIBEN Cameron | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 72 | CHOE Andrew | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | MISHIMA Torata | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | |
| 74 | MATEI Daniel | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 75 | CHOI Mason | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 76 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 2% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 77 | LEE Hudson | 8% | 37% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | STEWART Robert | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 79 | LI Jalen | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 80 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 81 | LUO Peter | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 82 | PHO Eric | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 83 | PAINTER Patrick I. | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 84 | CHEN Chang-Rung | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 85 | GONG Haixiang | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 86 | ZENG Zihan | 7% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 86 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 86 | PARK Nicholas | 27% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | LUO Aaron | 6% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 90 | ZHANG William | 7% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | WANG Yi Nan | 50% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 92 | PARK Brian | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 93 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 94 | NOP Will H. | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 95 | QI Terry | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 96 | CHEN Brian | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | GRAYSON Joshua | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 98 | PATEL Pratik | 15% | 45% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 99 | CHU Wenxi | 22% | 43% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.