King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WONG Nicholas A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
| 2 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 3 | LIU Alexander | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 3 | SHIV Rishi | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 40% | 14% |
| 5 | INSLER Ethan C. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 6 | PARK Ian C. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 10% |
| 7 | GOHEL Dayus T. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 8 | SILVERS Noah E. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 9 | JIN Owen | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 40% | 8% |
| 10 | LONCAR Luka E. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 11 | PRIHODKO Max | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | KOKENGE Reid | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 13 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 26% |
| 14 | HE Lawrence | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 15 | KIM Byung | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 16 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 17 | MORSE Tyler | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 18 | RHYU Kozmo | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 19 | JIN Daniel | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 20 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 21 | LI Benjamin | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 22 | SHAH Maximilian A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 22 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 24 | WU Joseph | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 25 | CHOI Mason | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | 1% | 7% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% |
| 27 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 27 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 29 | DIXON Thomas | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 30 | BASOK Nikita | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 31 | CAO Albert | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 32 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | - | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 33 | CAO Brad | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | < 1% |
| 34 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 35 | GAO Daniel | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | FELDMAN Jaemin | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 37 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | - | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 38 | RICHARD Owen | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
| 39 | WIECHMANN Colin | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 40 | PAPAVASSILIOU Christos | 1% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SERAFIN Ben | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | ZHAO corey | - | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 43 | LEE Noah | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 44 | LURVEY Samuel | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | ROWE Jason | 1% | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 46 | SIMPSON Patrick | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 47 | CHOI Marcus | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | BORODITSKY Ethan | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 49 | MISHIMA Torata | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 50 | KUMAR Aidan | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 51 | SEELEY Charlie | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | ZHAO Luhan | - | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 53 | KING Cameron | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 54 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 55 | PARK Frederick | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 56 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 57 | SINGH Aryaman | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 58 | LAM Bill | 37% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | TAHOUN Aly | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | WANG Eric S | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 61 | ROYTBURD Samuel | 2% | 19% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 63 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 64 | WU Jonathan | 9% | 45% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | ZHANG Richard | 6% | 44% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | LAI Aiden | 22% | 43% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 19% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | CHEN Jun Ho | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | WANG Max S | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 70 | ZHANG William | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | WANG Trontour | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 72 | MAHESH Tarun | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | WANG Kevin | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 74 | NESTERCZUK Maddox W. | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | LIU Terry | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 76 | LI Jalen | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 77 | FENG du | 91% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.