Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
2 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
3 | KNOX James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
3 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
5 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
6 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
7 | ZHAO Luhan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 20% | |
8 | SUN Jason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
9 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% |
10 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
11 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 9% |
12 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
13 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
14 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
15 | AGAON Shawn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
16 | ZHAI Avalo | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
17 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
18 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
19 | YANG Edward | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
20 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
21 | WANG zhixing (Daniel) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
22 | RICHARD Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% |
23 | JIANG ryan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
24 | XIAO Hanzhi (Shawn) | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
25 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
26 | SAVORETTI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
27 | LACROIX Floryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 4% |
28 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
29 | WEI HUNTER | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 4% |
30 | DORASZELSKI Mark | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
31 | CAUCHY Eliot | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
32 | WONG King-Yee | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
33 | KIM Byung | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% |
34 | CAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% |
35 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
36 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
37 | SHA Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
38 | ZHANG ethan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
39 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
40 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 26% |
41 | REDDY Arya | 100% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
42 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
43 | BASOK Nikita | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
44 | WANG justin | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
45 | AGAON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
46 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% | 1% |
47 | CAO Brad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
48 | SERAFIN Ben | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
49 | GOON Tristan Yang | 100% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
50 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
51 | DOYON - VERDON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 8% |
52 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
53 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
54 | ZHANG William | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
55 | MEN Junda | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
56 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
57 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 5% | |
58 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
59 | ZHAO Zidong | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
60 | NESTERCZUK Maddox W. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
61 | FANG Hanning | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
62 | CHAI Ethan | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
63 | WU Colin | 100% | 75% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
64 | TANG Charles | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
65 | OSTIGUY Cameron | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
66 | ZHEN Youwei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
67 | STELTENKAMP Neal | 100% | 80% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
68 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 3% |
69 | DOYON - VERDON William | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
70 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | |
71 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
72 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
73 | SONG Troy | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
74 | KRISHNAN Skanda | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
75 | PAN Tristan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
76 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
77 | LI Zachary | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
78 | SUN Jeffery | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
79 | YAO Bowen | 100% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
80 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 92% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
81 | FENG Du | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
82 | DUSSEAU Maddax | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
83 | CHOU Benson | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
84 | GILLER Augustus | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
85 | KWON Aaron | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
86 | FENG Shang | 100% | 78% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
87 | WOLFORD Benjamin | 100% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
88 | ZANELLI Ben | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
89 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 84% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
89 | REPIC Oliver | 100% | 97% | 70% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
91 | SUN James H. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
92 | HU Anton | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
93 | LIU Adam | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
94 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.