Capitol Clash SYC & RCC with Non-Regional Veteran and Y8

Y-12 Men's Foil

Friday, February 1, 2019 at 1:00 PM

National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CHENG Jonathan - - - 1% 10% 39% 50%
2 DESERANNO Jeidus - - - 1% 8% 37% 55%
3 LEE Joshua - - 1% 10% 32% 43% 14%
3 SOSNOV David - - 4% 15% 33% 34% 14%
5 BAS Liam - - 1% 7% 31% 47% 14%
5 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - - - 3% 16% 41% 39%
7 PELOSKY Zack B. - - 1% 7% 25% 41% 26%
7 SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. - - - 1% 9% 38% 53%
9 BRUK Peter J. - - 1% 7% 26% 43% 23%
10 KIM Tei D. - - - - 4% 32% 64%
11 GRAHAM Roy J. - - - - 3% 25% 72%
12 KEE Andrew L. - 1% 8% 36% 42% 13%
13 YANG Luao - - - 1% 12% 41% 46%
14 ZHANG Yun Isaac - - - 3% 23% 53% 20%
15 LI Richard - - 1% 5% 21% 43% 30%
16 MARX Oscar L. - - - 1% 9% 40% 51%
17 PAE Jonathan L. - - - 2% 18% 46% 35%
18 DOCTOR Aidan L. - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
19 TOLBA Abdelrahman - 1% 8% 24% 35% 25% 6%
20 GONG Benjamin - 1% 5% 21% 39% 29% 6%
21 WONG Garrick G. - - 1% 11% 34% 39% 14%
22 MARX Jackson L. - 1% 7% 23% 37% 27% 6%
23 AHN Jun - - - 7% 33% 44% 15%
24 ZHEN Ethan - - 6% 30% 46% 16% 2%
24 ZHAI Jeffrey - - 3% 21% 50% 24% 2%
26 DAI Jonathan T. - - 2% 14% 37% 38% 9%
27 ORVANANOS Jorge - - 5% 23% 42% 25% 5%
28 GOOR Julian - 3% 12% 29% 34% 19% 3%
29 HONG ISSAC - 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2%
30 ORR Spencer - - - 6% 31% 49% 13%
31 KIM Yonjae - - - 3% 17% 41% 39%
32 GEOGHEGAN Ronan - - 3% 19% 43% 29% 5%
33 JIANG Owen - - 2% 12% 36% 39% 11%
34 ANTON Nathaniel - - 2% 15% 41% 35% 7%
35 GUO Sean 1% 8% 25% 36% 23% 7% 1%
36 YAN Edward Tianshuo - 5% 23% 38% 26% 7% 1%
37 GORBACHEV Alexander - 1% 10% 42% 39% 7%
38 OH SEAN - - 4% 21% 47% 28%
39 PAE Brian L. - 2% 10% 28% 37% 20% 3%
40 DOUGLAS Oscar M. - - 2% 16% 40% 34% 7%
41 LIN James G. - 1% 7% 27% 41% 22% 3%
42 REEVES Liam - - 6% 25% 43% 22% 3%
43 DESHMUKH Arjun - - - 1% 10% 40% 49%
44 TAHOUN Mostafa 3% 22% 39% 27% 8% 1% -
45 CATINO Brennen - 1% 6% 27% 43% 21% 2%
46 WECHSLER Jacob 2% 16% 36% 32% 11% 1% -
47 LIU Eric Y. 12% 35% 35% 15% 2% -
48 WONG Adrian - - 5% 22% 45% 28%
49 TSIMIKLIS Yanni 5% 24% 38% 25% 6% -
50 ZHANG Evan - 5% 23% 38% 26% 7% 1%
51 MENG Zhaoyi 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
52 WU Alexander - 5% 20% 35% 28% 10% 1%
53 QIU Daniel 1% 10% 29% 35% 19% 5% -
54 LI Yao (Liam) - 1% 12% 34% 37% 14% 2%
55 PALMA Matthew Dominic - 9% 33% 38% 16% 3% -
56 LI Jinghua E. - 8% 30% 40% 18% 3% -
57 VIANNA Guilherme 3% 25% 42% 24% 5% - -
58 BASOK Nikita - 5% 24% 43% 23% 4% -
59 CULLIVAN Justice 10% 32% 37% 18% 4% -
60 GUO Justin 6% 23% 35% 26% 9% 2% -
61 TRAUGOT Owen G. 1% 9% 31% 38% 19% 3% -
62 GAO William 5% 26% 41% 22% 5% - -
63 SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden 6% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
64 SHAO Eric - 6% 30% 44% 17% 2% -
65 CEDERQUIST zachary - 2% 11% 31% 36% 17% 2%
66 PO Oliver - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
67 CANO Marcos E. - 4% 16% 30% 31% 16% 3%
68 CHEN Charlie Tian-You - - 1% 8% 37% 41% 13%
69 JI Aidan Y. - 4% 21% 43% 26% 6% -
70 TIYA BIAYA K. - 2% 11% 28% 35% 20% 4%
71 SONG Austin 2% 18% 40% 30% 9% 1% -
72 XU Jia Bao (Bowen) - - 2% 13% 33% 37% 15%
73 TANG August L. - 4% 18% 34% 30% 12% 2%
74 YU Jason - - 4% 20% 40% 31% 4%
75 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 3% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1% -
76 LI Matthew - 6% 27% 39% 23% 5% -
77 TIKHAEV Alexander 5% 28% 44% 20% 2% - -
78 ELWOOD Sebastian F. - - 2% 14% 42% 41%
79 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. 10% 37% 39% 12% 1% -
80 TORRES Treston 2% 14% 34% 33% 14% 2% -
81 LEWIS Akhil 9% 34% 37% 16% 3% - -
82 LEE Jacob 1% 8% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1%
83 BADLANI Dev 26% 47% 22% 4% - - -
84 XU Ethan - 4% 28% 48% 17% 2% -
85 TANG Albert 7% 27% 37% 23% 6% 1% -
85 LIU Ryan 37% 44% 16% 2% - - -
87 ZHOU Leon 7% 30% 38% 20% 5% - -
88 CHIN Ryan 1% 14% 46% 32% 6% - -
89 ZHANG Alex 10% 41% 37% 11% 1% - -
90 QIAN Jason H. - 5% 22% 38% 27% 7% -
91 OTTO Nathaniel B. 16% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
92 XIAO Benjamin - 3% 20% 42% 28% 7% -
93 KOKE Matthew C. 26% 53% 19% 2% - - -
94 KNIZHNIK David 38% 44% 16% 2% - -
95 SANTOS Carlos R. 15% 43% 34% 7% 1% -
96 LEE Lukas 4% 23% 39% 26% 7% 1% -
97 UHRMACHER Idris 22% 43% 28% 7% 1% - -
98 KLOTZ Isaiah 6% 32% 41% 18% 3% - -
99 BERNARD Jack B. 30% 41% 22% 6% 1% - -
100 SOLDATOV Faddey 6% 31% 43% 17% 2% - -
101 HIGGIN Matthew 21% 48% 27% 4% - - -
102 LIN Michael 1% 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
103 METTAPALLI Tarun 3% 38% 41% 16% 3% - -
104 QUINTERO Julian 29% 47% 21% 3% - - -
105 WANG mason 5% 30% 45% 18% 2% - -
106 DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. 35% 48% 15% 2% - - -
107 LEWIS Nikhil I. 40% 45% 14% 1% - - -
108 ROBBINS Tusker F. 6% 22% 34% 26% 11% 2% -
109 WONG Jackson 26% 41% 25% 7% 1% - -
110 CLICK Aiden 61% 33% 6% - - - -
111 LI Aaron 11% 33% 36% 17% 3% -
112 LEBHAR Viktor 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
113 PERSINGER Charles B. 16% 43% 33% 8% 1% - -
114 MAIER Finn 23% 43% 27% 6% 1% - -
115 CHO Ethan H. 3% 17% 32% 30% 15% 3% -
115 CHOO Christopher Y. 46% 40% 13% 2% - - -
115 BALAKIRSKIY Gabriel 46% 43% 10% 1% - - -
115 HUANG Eythan 56% 36% 7% - - - -
115 SI Kevin 15% 51% 28% 5% - - -
120 ORLOV Dmitriy 10% 35% 35% 16% 3% - -
121 BURGOS Jacob R. 20% 41% 29% 8% 1% - -
121 SANDHU LERNER Armaan S. 88% 11% - - - - -
123 XU Dinghui Ryan 12% 33% 34% 16% 4% - -
124 QUINN Nathan 18% 37% 30% 12% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.