National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
2 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
3 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 14% |
3 | SOSNOV David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
5 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | 14% |
5 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% |
7 | PELOSKY Zack B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
7 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
9 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
10 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 64% |
11 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
12 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | 13% | |
13 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 46% |
14 | ZHANG Yun Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 20% |
15 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
16 | MARX Oscar L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% |
17 | PAE Jonathan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 35% |
18 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
19 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
20 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 6% |
21 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% |
22 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
23 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 15% |
24 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 18% | 2% |
24 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 26% | 2% |
26 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 9% |
27 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 5% |
28 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
29 | HONG ISSAC | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
30 | ORR Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 13% |
31 | KIM Yonjae | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% |
32 | GEOGHEGAN Ronan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | 5% |
33 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 11% |
34 | ANTON Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 7% |
35 | GUO Sean | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
36 | YAN Edward Tianshuo | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
37 | GORBACHEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% | 7% | |
38 | OH SEAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 28% | |
39 | PAE Brian L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
40 | DOUGLAS Oscar M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 7% |
41 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | 3% |
42 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 25% | 3% |
43 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
44 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
45 | CATINO Brennen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | 2% |
46 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
47 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | |
48 | WONG Adrian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 28% | |
49 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | - | |
50 | ZHANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
51 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
52 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
53 | QIU Daniel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
54 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | 2% |
55 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - |
56 | LI Jinghua E. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - |
57 | VIANNA Guilherme | 100% | 97% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
58 | BASOK Nikita | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | 4% | - |
59 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
60 | GUO Justin | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
61 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - |
62 | GAO William | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
63 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
64 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - |
65 | CEDERQUIST zachary | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
66 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
67 | CANO Marcos E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
68 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% | 13% |
69 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | 6% | - |
70 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
71 | SONG Austin | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
72 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
73 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
74 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 4% |
75 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
76 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - |
77 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 95% | 66% | 23% | 2% | - | - |
78 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
79 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 90% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | |
80 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - |
81 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
82 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
83 | BADLANI Dev | 100% | 74% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
84 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 19% | 2% | - |
85 | TANG Albert | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
85 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
87 | ZHOU Leon | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
88 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 38% | 6% | - | - |
89 | ZHANG Alex | 100% | 90% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
90 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 8% | - |
91 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
92 | XIAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | 7% | - |
93 | KOKE Matthew C. | 100% | 74% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
94 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
95 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 85% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | |
96 | LEE Lukas | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
97 | UHRMACHER Idris | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
98 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 94% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
99 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
100 | SOLDATOV Faddey | 100% | 94% | 63% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
101 | HIGGIN Matthew | 100% | 79% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - |
102 | LIN Michael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
103 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 100% | 97% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
104 | QUINTERO Julian | 100% | 71% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
105 | WANG mason | 100% | 95% | 65% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
106 | DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. | 100% | 65% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
107 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 100% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
108 | ROBBINS Tusker F. | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
109 | WONG Jackson | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
110 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
111 | LI Aaron | 100% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
112 | LEBHAR Viktor | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
113 | PERSINGER Charles B. | 100% | 84% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
114 | MAIER Finn | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
115 | CHO Ethan H. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
115 | CHOO Christopher Y. | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
115 | BALAKIRSKIY Gabriel | 100% | 54% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
115 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 44% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
115 | SI Kevin | 100% | 85% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
120 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 90% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
121 | BURGOS Jacob R. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
121 | SANDHU LERNER Armaan S. | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
123 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
124 | QUINN Nathan | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.