Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 26% | |
| 2 | PRASAD Ankith | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 3 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 54% |
| 3 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | |
| 5 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 6% | |
| 6 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | |
| 7 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 60% | |
| 8 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 9 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
| 10 | LEONE Charles D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 11 | LIEF Isaac R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 7% |
| 12 | BORODITSKY Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 13 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 14 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 15 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | 100% | 89% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | CAO Albert | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 17 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 25% | |
| 18 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 19 | JUN Jaywu | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 20 | CHAMBLISS Logan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 15% |
| 21 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 22 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | 5% |
| 23 | JANG Elliot | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 25 | TAHOUN Aly | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 8% | |
| 26 | ILYAS Zakariya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 19% | |
| 27 | CAO Brad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 63% | |
| 28 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | GLOGOWSKI Konrad | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 31 | SKORUPAN Grant | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | ZENG Zihan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 33 | DURKIN Tristan E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 43% | 3% | |
| 34 | LOISEAU Eliott | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 35 | SU Caleb | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 36 | HIGGIN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 37 | WALCH Logan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 33% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 39 | KIM Prestin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 40 | SHARMA Om V. | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | MISHRA Milan B. | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | JORDAN Anton | 100% | 35% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | PENHOET Adrien E. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 95% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | ZHANG Kingston | 100% | 99% | 77% | 32% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 95% | 68% | 24% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | MUMMIDI Rishi | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | MEISTER Josemaria J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 50 | LOBSENZ Danny | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | HUBSCHER Max | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 53 | CHOI Aleksey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 9% | - |
| 54 | BAYASGALAN Taivan | 100% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | JONES Aidan | 100% | 95% | 53% | 9% | - | - | |
| 56 | ROMERO KURI Carlos Alexander | 100% | 91% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | MITCHELL Cooper | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | - | - |
| 58 | YEUNG Yun | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.