Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 16% |
| 2 | LIU John | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 3 | ZHU Wilson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
| 3 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% | |
| 5 | SHARMA Sanil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 6 | WALKER IV Weymouth D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 7 | XU Zitong (Evan) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% |
| 8 | ZAFFT Maximo S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 9 | LIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 10 | PERSAUD Daivik | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 12% |
| 12 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 13 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 14 | PRASAD Ankith | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
| 15 | XIAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | |
| 16 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 17 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
| 18 | PAEK Alex J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
| 19 | KRONROD Tal | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 20 | TRAN Dai Long | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 20 | SITBON-TAYLOR Noe B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
| 22 | ADLER Ethan M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 23 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 24 | HODGE Jaydon L. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | TAE William G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 26 | KIM Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 27 | DOLMETSCH Max | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 28 | XIAO Zherui | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 29 | NOMANI Shibli D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 30 | LEE Timothy S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 31 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 32 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | GLAZ Nicholas S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 34 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 35 | LONCAR Luka E. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 36 | SHAH S Ayush | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 37 | CRANE Matthew T. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 38 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 39 | ZHENG Hagen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
| 40 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 41 | WIMMER Chandler M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 42 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 43 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 44 | DOAN Joseph M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 44 | BRENNAN Charles F. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 46 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 47 | KOBI Samuel | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 48 | PAK Charles | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 49 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 50 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 51 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
| 52 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 53 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 54 | MOON Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 55 | JOSEPH William | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 56 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 57 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 58 | HAN Andersen Y. | 100% | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 59 | KING Cameron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 59 | XIAN Riley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
| 61 | PADHYE Siddhant | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 62 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 63 | NOH Ray | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 64 | CHU Allan | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 65 | INSLER Gabriel C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 66 | BAGHA Armin | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 67 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 68 | ZHAO Luhan | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 69 | GLECKNER Aidan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 70 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 70 | CHONG christopher | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 72 | WU Byron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 73 | BEKKER Mitchel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 43% | 12% |
| 74 | SHIV Rishi | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 75 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 76 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 77 | GALBIATI Leonardo | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 78 | SALISBURY Cary | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 79 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 80 | TRIMMER Colin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 81 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 82 | KIM William M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% | |
| 83 | SJOSTEDT Jacob H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
| 84 | STUBBLEFIELD Alexander | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 85 | PICCUS Isaac S. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 86 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 87 | FELDMAN Jaemin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 88 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 89 | LU Sebastian X. | 100% | 96% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 90 | MAENG Jake W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 91 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 92 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 93 | HU Matthew | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 94 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 85% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 95 | STUBBLEFIELD Evan | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 96 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 97 | KIM Ryan | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 98 | LING Jaden | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | FURST Matthew C. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 99 | SUMMER Zachary | 100% | 65% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 101 | WANG Tristan | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 102 | LEONE III Charles D. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 102 | SAMMS-HAY Cameron | 100% | 71% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 104 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 105 | CORDDRY Matthew | 100% | 55% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 106 | SALERNO Gaetano | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 107 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 108 | REITINGER Luke M. | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 109 | THOMPSON Benjamin | 100% | 92% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 110 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 111 | GOLDMAN Isaac | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 112 | COUGHLIN Nolan E. | 100% | 56% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 113 | CIGLIANO Benjamin I. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 114 | GARLAND Nathaniel | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 115 | MILLER Kurt | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.