October NAC

Cadet Men's Foil

Friday, October 29, 2021 at 8:30 AM

America's Center Convention Complex - St. Louis, MO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CHEN Allen - - 5% 22% 43% 30%
2 DESERANNO Jeidus - - - - 3% 27% 70%
3 GRAHAM Roy J. - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
3 YANG Luao - - 1% 6% 23% 41% 29%
5 WONG Adam L. - - - 1% 13% 44% 42%
6 UM Ethan A. - - - 2% 14% 41% 42%
7 CHEN Andrew - - - - 6% 35% 58%
8 BAS Liam - - - 2% 14% 43% 41%
9 KIM Nicholas W. - - - 1% 7% 35% 57%
10 MURUHIN Yaroslav - 4% 19% 35% 30% 10% 1%
11 BURKE Spencer W. - - - 1% 12% 42% 45%
11 JEON Caleb A. - - - 4% 18% 42% 36%
13 FOGELSON Frederick J. - - 1% 8% 28% 41% 22%
14 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) - - 1% 7% 27% 42% 23%
15 HUTH Mitchell - - 2% 15% 42% 40%
16 KAO Castor T. - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
17 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - - - 1% 11% 38% 49%
18 JAIN Aditya - - 1% 11% 33% 40% 15%
19 SHA Yi Peng - - 5% 19% 37% 32% 7%
20 FUKUDA Renzo K. - - 1% 5% 22% 42% 31%
21 RUSADZE Nickolas - - 2% 18% 51% 29%
22 GOOR Julian - - 2% 12% 34% 40% 12%
23 ZHANG Andy W. - - - 6% 37% 56%
24 LI Eric - 2% 14% 35% 38% 11%
25 SINGH Dayaal - - - 2% 11% 39% 48%
26 LI Richard - - - 2% 13% 41% 45%
27 SONG Aiden S. - - 1% 7% 25% 41% 25%
28 WU Alexander - - 1% 11% 45% 44%
29 CULLIVAN Justice - - 3% 13% 32% 37% 15%
30 NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. 1% 6% 21% 35% 27% 9% 1%
31 GODZHIK Zachary - - 5% 26% 51% 17%
32 VAZQUEZ Zander - - 3% 19% 42% 31% 5%
33 HOBSON Aaron K. 2% 15% 33% 33% 15% 2%
34 SONG Leonardo T. - 1% 9% 29% 41% 20%
35 LI Raphael C. - - - 5% 24% 43% 27%
36 DORAN Wesley C. - - 1% 11% 38% 41% 9%
37 WU Nicholas - - 2% 13% 34% 37% 14%
38 ZHANG Yun Isaac - - 4% 20% 39% 30% 7%
39 LI Owen - - 2% 13% 40% 37% 9%
40 DETERING Julian - 2% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1%
41 HOOSHI Dylan M. - - - 2% 14% 41% 43%
42 ZELTSER Lawrence M. - - 2% 17% 42% 32% 6%
43 SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. - - 2% 14% 41% 43%
44 FREEDMAN Samuel E. - 2% 11% 30% 39% 19%
45 FUKUDA Alessio R. - 2% 14% 36% 37% 11%
46 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - 4% 20% 44% 33%
47 BAE Kevin - 1% 8% 29% 43% 19%
48 LO Conrad - - - 2% 12% 39% 46%
49 DIERKS Kian - - 3% 17% 41% 34% 6%
50 GAO William - 5% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1%
51 ONIK Elijah T. - - - 4% 23% 49% 24%
52 DAI Jonathan T. - - 4% 18% 38% 31% 9%
52 KIM Ryan Y. - 2% 17% 37% 32% 11% 1%
54 SADOVSKY Leor B. 1% 10% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
54 SICHITIU Alexander - 2% 11% 30% 36% 18% 3%
56 SIU Aiden - 5% 21% 36% 27% 9% 1%
57 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - 4% 17% 33% 31% 14% 2%
58 WYMAN Julian - 2% 11% 29% 35% 19% 4%
59 DU Samuel R. - 1% 9% 26% 36% 23% 5%
60 DANKAR Neel - - 1% 9% 30% 44% 16%
61 CANO Marcos E. 1% 9% 28% 36% 20% 4% -
62 BING Charles - - 2% 13% 38% 40% 7%
63 CHIN Julian S. 1% 7% 25% 39% 24% 5%
64 LE Jacob W. 7% 29% 38% 21% 5% -
65 KWON Ethan - - 2% 16% 43% 39%
66 ROSE Ben 1% 12% 32% 35% 17% 4% -
67 AHN Jun - - 1% 10% 36% 41% 13%
68 BANERJEE ANUP - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 14%
69 BRUK Peter J. - 2% 10% 30% 40% 19%
70 CANLAS Nathan - 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 5%
71 TANG Owen S. - 3% 15% 33% 34% 14% 2%
72 SUNG Chang-Han S. - 1% 5% 18% 36% 32% 8%
73 WANG Ethan 2% 15% 35% 34% 13% 2% -
74 LIN Michael 1% 6% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1%
75 PO Oliver - 4% 21% 43% 26% 5% -
76 LIU Eric Y. - 3% 15% 34% 33% 13% 2%
77 LEE Jacob - 7% 26% 37% 23% 6% 1%
78 SISINNI Riccardo 13% 37% 36% 12% 2% - -
79 WONG Adrian - - 5% 22% 40% 27% 6%
80 LEE Lukas 1% 9% 31% 40% 16% 2% -
81 WONG Garrick G. - 1% 8% 28% 42% 19% 2%
81 REEVES Liam - 4% 17% 35% 31% 12% 1%
83 NAGER Noah - 1% 8% 27% 39% 22% 4%
84 JI Aidan Y. 1% 7% 22% 35% 26% 8% 1%
85 TAN Christien - 6% 25% 38% 23% 6% 1%
85 NGUYEN Liam 22% 43% 28% 7% 1% - -
87 BERK Theodore 2% 15% 38% 33% 11% 1%
88 KIM Yonjae - 1% 10% 35% 41% 13%
89 NUNNINK Phillip W. - 2% 13% 35% 37% 13%
89 GONG Benjamin - 3% 20% 41% 29% 6%
91 WOO Christian 7% 27% 37% 22% 6% 1%
92 KIM Aiden 36% 45% 16% 2% - -
93 LEE Jacob J 1% 13% 37% 35% 12% 1%
94 WECHSLER Jacob 2% 16% 40% 33% 7% -
95 FORTUNE Alexander J. 4% 21% 38% 28% 8% 1%
96 YU Anders - - 1% 13% 39% 38% 9%
97 LIN Dashiell - 1% 5% 19% 36% 30% 9%
98 LEWIS Akhil 12% 36% 34% 14% 3% - -
98 LIN James G. 7% 27% 37% 22% 6% 1% -
100 OH SEAN - - 3% 19% 44% 29% 4%
101 GORBACHEV Alexander - 5% 28% 39% 22% 5% -
101 MEJIA MATTHEW D. 1% 10% 31% 37% 18% 4% -
103 HO Jia Le Sean - 1% 6% 22% 37% 28% 7%
104 TSAY Jeremy M. - 1% 7% 25% 39% 24% 5%
105 LUH Ethan K. - 1% 6% 22% 38% 28% 5%
106 KEE Andrew L. 1% 6% 23% 36% 26% 8% 1%
107 KANG Anthony 1% 6% 22% 37% 27% 7% 1%
108 PARK Jason B. 8% 30% 37% 20% 4% - -
109 CO Dylan 13% 33% 34% 16% 4% - -
110 TANG August L. 5% 25% 39% 24% 6% - -
111 KIM Derek A. 1% 10% 34% 41% 13% 1%
112 LEE Aidan - 3% 16% 35% 34% 12%
113 JIANG Owen 5% 26% 39% 24% 6% 1%
114 WU Jerry - 7% 28% 40% 21% 3%
115 ORONOWICZ Jakub 5% 31% 43% 19% 3% -
116 MUSHER Benjamin J. 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2%
117 LOVIN Vlad 2% 15% 34% 32% 13% 2% -
118 WILLIAMS Connor J. 3% 24% 39% 25% 8% 1% -
119 ELWOOD Sebastian F. - 4% 17% 35% 32% 11% 1%
119 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. 4% 28% 41% 22% 5% 1% -
121 MATSAKH Philip 11% 33% 34% 17% 4% - -
122 KNIZHNIK David 3% 17% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
123 TORRES Treston 2% 22% 40% 27% 8% 1% -
124 GATZA Logan - 4% 20% 39% 29% 7% -
125 LI Aaron 3% 23% 39% 26% 8% 1% -
126 DOCTOR Aidan L. 3% 17% 34% 32% 13% 2%
127 SEAL Maximus R. 9% 38% 37% 14% 2% -
128 PARK Gabriel 32% 42% 20% 4% - - -
129 ZHAI Jeffrey - - 6% 24% 39% 26% 5%
130 ORR Spencer - 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
131 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 17% 41% 31% 10% 1% - -
132 KUO Evan - 5% 24% 40% 24% 6% 1%
133 HOSKERI Anik S. 1% 11% 29% 35% 19% 5% -
134 DAVIDSON Elliot 7% 27% 37% 22% 6% 1% -
135 LEE Jonah 1% 14% 37% 36% 11% 1% -
136 CHOE Jayden K. 44% 42% 13% 2% - -
137 DRESSEL Jet 24% 46% 25% 5% - -
138 KNOEPFFLER Alex 3% 18% 36% 31% 11% 1%
139 ZHEN Ethan 1% 11% 33% 37% 15% 2%
140 KANDAGADLA Rishi 55% 36% 8% 1% - -
141 ELKOUSY Laith H. 8% 28% 37% 22% 6% 1%
142 OROSZLAN Daniel 6% 30% 40% 20% 4% -
143 PITERBARG Maxim 4% 25% 46% 21% 3% - -
144 DEGROOT Blake 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3% -
145 LU Yikai - 2% 10% 27% 35% 21% 4%
146 PALMA Matthew Dominic - 2% 18% 37% 31% 11% 1%
147 POLONSKI Anthony 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
148 DESHMUKH Arjun 2% 23% 41% 26% 7% 1% -
149 LIM Lance Jeremiah 40% 49% 10% 1% - - -
150 CHEN Charlie Tian-You 7% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
151 SYOMICHEV Gleb A. 5% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
151 BRETON Louis 2% 15% 33% 32% 14% 3% -
153 WU Lucas 5% 28% 42% 22% 4% - -
154 LI Matthew 3% 19% 42% 28% 7% 1%
155 GUO Justin 43% 41% 14% 2% - -
156 IVANENKO Alex 51% 38% 10% 1% - -
157 KRYLTSOV Michael 5% 24% 37% 26% 8% 1%
158 CHEN Kyle P. 30% 42% 22% 6% 1% -
159 HUANG Eythan 30% 46% 21% 3% - -
160 SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden 6% 34% 41% 16% 2% -
161 MIN Eric - 3% 18% 38% 31% 8% 1%
162 SHAGIDANYAN German 31% 43% 21% 5% 1% - -
163 OH Jaden 5% 30% 41% 20% 3% - -
164 LI Samuel 39% 41% 16% 3% - - -
165 QUINTERO Julian 48% 44% 8% 1% - - -
166 ORTEGA Jose-Arnel 12% 36% 35% 15% 2% - -
166 YAO Bradley 3% 26% 41% 23% 6% 1% -
168 SIMA Congyu Josh 1% 8% 33% 38% 17% 3% -
169 STRUGAR Marcus A. - < 1% 3% 16% 36% 35% 10%
170 FUKUDA Diego 8% 30% 39% 19% 4% - -
171 PAN Henry 6% 27% 41% 22% 4% - -
172 AGRAWAL Niki 22% 44% 27% 6% - - -
173 GUO Sean 3% 17% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
173 LOVE Aaron 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3% -
173 KUANG Aaron 24% 52% 21% 3% - - -
176 ZHANG Aaron 25% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
177 LAM Nicolas 25% 45% 25% 5% - - -
178 LLIDO Soren 10% 34% 36% 16% 3% - -
179 GOGOI Vir K. 7% 30% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
179 ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) 16% 39% 32% 11% 2% - -
181 TANG Albert 11% 40% 37% 11% 1% - -
182 PONS Diego 37% 43% 17% 3% - - -
182 PARK Sky 48% 41% 9% 1% - - -
184 ZHANG Jiening G. 17% 38% 31% 12% 2% -
185 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. 2% 17% 42% 32% 6% -
186 DINSAY Kristjan 32% 43% 21% 4% - -
187 EDISON Ansel 68% 28% 4% - - - -
187 TALASILA Arush 53% 37% 9% 1% - - -
189 DORE Davis 15% 43% 31% 9% 1% -
190 ZHAO Bowen 69% 27% 4% - - - -
191 LAI Twayne 25% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
191 YU Leo 17% 38% 32% 11% 2% - -
193 ARIZA Abraham J. 18% 39% 30% 10% 2% - -
193 LIPPMAN Sam 39% 42% 16% 3% - - -
195 HAN Derek 24% 48% 24% 4% - -
196 ZOU Yuming 65% 30% 5% - - - -
196 SANDERS Jack 17% 47% 28% 7% 1% - -
196 HUANG Zijian 33% 48% 16% 2% - - -
196 CROOM Tucker 15% 40% 33% 10% 1% - -
200 BOYKO Miles 64% 30% 6% - - - -
201 HE Tyler 18% 41% 32% 9% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.