America's Center Convention Complex - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHEN Allen | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% | |
2 | CHEN Andrew | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
3 | EMMER Chase T. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 75% |
3 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 4% |
5 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
5 | JEON Caleb A. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 30% |
7 | UM Ethan A. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
8 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
9 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 51% | |
10 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
11 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
12 | KASI Sanjay | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
13 | WOO Christian | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
14 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
15 | BANERJEE ANUP | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
15 | ONIK Elijah T. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
17 | CHEN Ziyuan | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 39% |
18 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
19 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% | |
20 | LEE Jacob J | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
21 | LEE Aidan | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
22 | GOOR Julian | - | - | 4% | 27% | 50% | 18% | |
23 | SICHITIU Alexander | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
24 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
25 | LU Yikai | 1% | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
26 | LI Richard | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
27 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 3% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
28 | WU Alexander | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
29 | REYES Omar | - | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
30 | LI Matthew | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
31 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
32 | KNIZHNIK David | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
33 | XIAO Enoch A. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
34 | XIAO Ethan J. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
35 | HUTH Mitchell | - | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
36 | KIM Yonjae | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 16% |
37 | SISINNI Riccardo | - | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
38 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% |
39 | BRUK Peter J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
40 | SONG Aiden S. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
40 | LI Raphael C. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
42 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 26% |
43 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
44 | YU Vinni | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
45 | PYO Michael M. | - | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
46 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% | |
47 | KIM Brandon J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
48 | LO Conrad | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 21% |
49 | SIU Aiden | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
50 | STANLEY Mason B. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
51 | MIALL Steven A. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
52 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
53 | ZHANG Yun Isaac | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 23% | 3% | |
54 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
55 | COELHO Cristiano P. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
56 | MOHAMED Amir | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
57 | JANG Jaewon | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
58 | LI Eric | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
59 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
60 | JIANG Owen | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
61 | LI Owen | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
62 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
62 | HAN Changhee | 2% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
64 | PO Oliver | - | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
65 | DETERING Julian | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | < 1% |
66 | SINGH Dayaal | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 45% | 28% |
67 | BAS Liam | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 32% |
68 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% |
69 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
70 | SONG Leonardo T. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 37% | 10% |
70 | LEWIS Akhil | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
72 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
73 | MURRAY Maximo | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
74 | LIN James G. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
75 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
76 | HE Xiangrui | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
77 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
78 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | - | 1% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
79 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
80 | CHENG Nathan | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
81 | DORAN Wesley C. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
82 | YU Anders | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
83 | WU DING-JUN | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
84 | LUH Ethan K. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
84 | BADLANI Dev | 3% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
86 | XIAO EDWARD | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
87 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 13% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
88 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
89 | ZHAI Jeffrey | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
90 | AHN Jun | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
91 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
92 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
93 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
94 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
94 | OH SEAN | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
96 | MATSAKH Philip | 5% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
97 | CHIN Julian S. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
98 | BING Charles | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
99 | EDISON Ansel | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
100 | BALL James T. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
101 | SHA Yi Peng | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
102 | KIAYIAS Aris | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
103 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 3% | 24% | 47% | 22% | 3% | - | |
104 | DIERKS Kian | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
104 | TANG Owen S. | - | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
106 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
107 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
108 | KIM Jackson | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
109 | LE Jacob W. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
110 | MOHAMED Murad | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
111 | NUNNINK Phillip W. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
112 | ROSE Ben | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
113 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 4% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
113 | JI Aidan Y. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
115 | KOBAL Maximilian | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
116 | LEE Chris | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
117 | GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
117 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 33% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
117 | LI Arvin | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
120 | KIM Adrian | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
121 | LOVIN Vlad | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
122 | GONG Benjamin | 1% | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
123 | PAN Henry | 8% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
124 | WYMAN Julian | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
125 | LANG Dong Lin | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
125 | ORTEGA Jose-Arnel | 17% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
127 | CHENG Jonathan | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
128 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
129 | TAN Christien | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
130 | MYERS Dean | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
131 | CANO Marcos E. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
132 | DINSAY Kristjan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
133 | FLYNN Ian | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
134 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 49% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
135 | DORE Davis | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
136 | LIN Michael | 1% | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
137 | GARCIA HERNANDEZ Lucas | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
138 | LIU William | 61% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
139 | TSAO Lukas | 3% | 37% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | |
140 | MA Andrew | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
141 | HSIAO Nicholas | 39% | 46% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
142 | LEE Jacob | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
143 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 23% | 48% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
144 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
145 | BAE Kevin | - | < 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
145 | GUO Justin | 9% | 41% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
145 | FUKUDA Diego | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
148 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
149 | KEE Andrew L. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
150 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
151 | QIAN Jason H. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
152 | GOGOI Vir K. | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
153 | ZHEN Ethan | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
153 | ALONSO Vinicius | 43% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
155 | SONG Bryan | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
155 | TEH Ryan | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
157 | WEI Chit Chun (David) | 25% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
158 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
159 | BOYKO Miles | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
160 | GNEUHS Sam | 50% | 44% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
161 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
162 | CHOE Jayden K. | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
163 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
164 | SONG Noel | 11% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
165 | ZHAO Bowen | 26% | 49% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
166 | LI Jett | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
167 | CHOI Simon | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
168 | KOKKER Thomas | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
169 | METTE Russell | 42% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
170 | MORRISON Eddie | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.