Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG YuJian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
2 | LEHR William D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 39% |
3 | TOWNSEND Avery S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
3 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 39% | 7% |
5 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
6 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 28% | |
7 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
8 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
9 | PACYNA Atilla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
10 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
11 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
12 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
13 | PARK Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
14 | RONG Yao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
15 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
16 | LIU Kyle | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
17 | HUANG Zijin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
18 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 55% | 18% |
19 | DIB Aaniss | 100% | 86% | 52% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
20 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - |
21 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
22 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
23 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 9% |
24 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 25% | |
25 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - | |
25 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 20% | 2% | |
27 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 7% | |
28 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
29 | GULLO Kenji Y. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 5% | |
30 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | - | |
31 | KOBI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
32 | AGAON Shawn | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
33 | GOLDFINE Ian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
34 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% | - |
35 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
36 | STEVENS George | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
37 | FELDMAN Jaemin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
38 | JUN Jaywu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 7% |
39 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
40 | GASIOROWSKI Devin G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
41 | ZENG Zihan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% | - |
42 | GUBIN Bobby | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
43 | BEZRODNOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
44 | SIDDIQUI Humza K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
45 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
46 | BORODITSKY Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
47 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
48 | GALIS Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
49 | WU Jason | 100% | 96% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
50 | LIU Jack | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
51 | WU Byron | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
52 | SHI Edric | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
53 | CHAI Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
55 | CANO Diego A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
56 | LANGTON Sawyer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
57 | WU Marcus | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
58 | WANG Eric S | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
59 | SALERNO Gaetano | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 33% |
60 | WEI Michael | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
61 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
62 | KIM Prestin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
63 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
64 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
65 | RAWSON Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
66 | DYER Ian E. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
68 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
69 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% | - |
70 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
71 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
72 | LEE Hudson | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
73 | BHATIA Rahil | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
74 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
75 | NESTERCZUK Maddox W. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
76 | KAPLAN Alejandro | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
77 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 86% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
78 | AGAON Ethan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
79 | WEI Jonny | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
80 | YAN Phillip | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
80 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
82 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
83 | DIXON Thomas | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
84 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
85 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | |
86 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
87 | MUN Chur-Yong | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
88 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
89 | CHOW Maxwell | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
90 | DURKIN Tristan E. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
91 | JANG Elliot | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
91 | CAO Brad | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
93 | CAO Albert | 100% | 70% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
94 | ZHAO Luhan | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
95 | GUHA Om | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
96 | MCGREEVY Alexander P. | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
97 | SCHADE Lucas | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
98 | LIN Chenzhe | 100% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
99 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
100 | SEELEY Charlie | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 2% | - | |
101 | YUAN Zijie | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
102 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
103 | ALKEMA Benjamin | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 2% | - | |
104 | ZHUANG Alex | 100% | 90% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
105 | LIU Yichen | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
106 | ZHANG Bruce | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
107 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
108 | ROYTBURD Samuel | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.