Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 31% |
| 2 | PRASAD Ankith | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 3 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
| 3 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 15% |
| 5 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 6 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 7 | LEONE III Charles D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% |
| 8 | SENNEWALD Frederick A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 9 | LONCAR Luka E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 10 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 11 | CHONG christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 15% |
| 12 | GOLDFINE Ian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 13 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 14 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 15 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 16 | SENNEWALD James J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 17 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 18 | KUDRIAVTCEV Sergei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
| 19 | NEAL John P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
| 20 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 21 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
| 22 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 22% |
| 23 | GALLO James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
| 24 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 25 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 26 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 27 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 3% |
| 28 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 29 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
| 30 | THOMAS Harris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
| 31 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 32 | MCALISTER Ian | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 33 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 34 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 36 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 37 | DESTEFANO Julius | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 38 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | LOISEAU Eliott | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 40 | CHU Allan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 41 | MULCAHY Olaf | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 42 | DAVIS Jonah | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | SARKAR agniv | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | NIKOLOV Peter | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 45 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 46 | ZHANG William | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
| 48 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 48 | XIAO Andrew | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | VEZMAR Evan H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 51 | KRZYSIAK David F. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | YOUNG Peyton E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
| 53 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 54 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 55 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 56 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 57 | IMREK Elijah S. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 58 | LAI Boden | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | MAYER Paul-Magnus V. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 60 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 22% |
| 61 | HEADRICK Lance | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 62 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 63 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 85% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | SKORUPAN Grant | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 65 | XIONG Aaron | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 66 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 67 | GAITHER Christopher W. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 68 | KRAMER Warren | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 69 | SONG Alexander | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 70 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 71 | HERNANDEZ Cole F. | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 72 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 73 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 74 | LO Jake | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 75 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 76 | CHOI Mason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 77 | MUGA Aiden | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 79 | CHOI Marcus | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | NGUYEN Tate | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 81 | ELLISON Harper F. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 82 | XIA Oliver | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 83 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 84 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 85 | LAI Aiden | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 86 | WANG owen | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 87 | KIM Jayden | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 88 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 89 | ZHU Eric | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 90 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 91 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 92 | HESSE Hans | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 93 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
| 93 | DODIN David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 95 | TAM Ethan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 96 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 97 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 98 | YU Austin | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 100 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 101 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 102 | GADDE Neel | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.