USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Cadet Men's Foil

Wednesday, July 6, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Minneapolis, MN, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 BAS Liam - - - - 2% 19% 79%
2 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 22%
3 KAO Castor T. - - - - 4% 27% 69%
3 LI Richard - - - - 4% 27% 68%
5 KIM Yonjae - - - 3% 17% 43% 38%
6 YANG Luao - - - - 4% 30% 66%
7 HO Jia Le Sean - - - 3% 18% 42% 36%
8 LEE Jacob J - 1% 4% 17% 33% 32% 12%
9 GODZHIK Zachary - - - 2% 13% 40% 44%
10 LO Conrad - - - - 2% 20% 78%
11 BRUK Peter J. - - - 2% 12% 40% 46%
12 TANG Owen S. - 1% 7% 25% 40% 24% 3%
13 LI Owen - - - 1% 11% 38% 50%
14 YU Anders - - - 1% 9% 39% 51%
15 BANERJEE Anup - - 1% 7% 24% 40% 27%
16 WYMAN Julian - - 2% 14% 38% 37% 9%
17 GRAHAM Roy J. - - - 1% 12% 41% 46%
17 GOOR Julian - - - 1% 6% 32% 61%
19 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - - - 1% 8% 34% 57%
20 PELOSKY Zack B. - - - 1% 10% 37% 52%
21 CULLIVAN Justice - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
21 ZHAI Jeffrey - - - 4% 20% 44% 32%
23 SIU Aiden - - 2% 12% 35% 42% 9%
24 LOVE Aaron - 1% 8% 26% 39% 24% 2%
25 GARCIA Sebastian R. - 3% 18% 39% 31% 8%
26 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - - 3% 16% 37% 34% 9%
27 SADOVSKY Leor B. - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 22%
28 BING Charles - - 1% 5% 20% 42% 33%
29 GAO William - - 4% 18% 37% 33% 8%
30 LI Matthew - 3% 15% 34% 33% 13% 1%
31 DESERANNO Jeidus - - - < 1% 6% 31% 63%
32 ELKOUSY Laith H. - 2% 11% 31% 37% 17% 2%
33 AHN Jun - - - 4% 19% 41% 34%
34 COELHO Cristiano P. - 1% 8% 27% 42% 22%
35 LEE Aidan - - 1% 8% 29% 41% 21%
36 CANLAS Nathan - 1% 4% 18% 36% 32% 9%
37 JEON Caleb A. - - - 2% 12% 38% 48%
37 MOHAMED Amir - 1% 6% 21% 38% 29% 6%
39 SONG Aiden S. - - - 2% 12% 39% 47%
40 LU Yikai - - 2% 14% 38% 35% 10%
41 BAEK David 3% 17% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
42 TSIMIKLIS Yanni - - 3% 18% 41% 32% 7%
43 JIANG Owen - - 2% 10% 29% 39% 20%
44 LE Jacob W. - 1% 6% 21% 38% 29% 5%
45 GUERRA Gabriel H. 1% 10% 28% 35% 20% 5% -
46 KEE Andrew L. - - 4% 16% 34% 34% 12%
47 ZHANG Yun Isaac - 2% 11% 31% 40% 17%
48 LI Eric - 1% 9% 31% 42% 18%
49 WOO Christian - - 2% 13% 34% 39% 12%
50 XU Jia Bao (Bowen) - - 2% 16% 38% 34% 10%
51 WONG Adrian - 1% 6% 23% 38% 26% 6%
52 DOCTOR Aidan L. - 1% 7% 24% 39% 25% 5%
53 TIYA BIAYA K. 1% 6% 20% 33% 27% 11% 2%
54 MA Andrew - 4% 18% 35% 31% 11% 1%
55 ORVANANOS Jorge - 4% 16% 32% 32% 14% 1%
56 REYES Omar - 2% 14% 35% 33% 13% 2%
57 ACHILOV Sayid - 1% 7% 23% 37% 27% 6%
58 YOON DYLAN 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5% -
59 LEE Jacob 1% 6% 22% 34% 27% 9% 1%
60 CHIN Julian S. - 1% 7% 27% 43% 23%
61 CANO Marcos E. - 4% 18% 34% 31% 12% 1%
62 LI Avery Peihong 3% 19% 37% 30% 10% 1%
63 KIM Jackson - 5% 20% 35% 29% 10% 1%
64 DESHMUKH Arjun - 3% 16% 34% 32% 12% 1%
65 RUSADZE Nickolas - - - 2% 12% 38% 48%
66 DAI Jonathan T. - - - 1% 8% 34% 58%
67 GLASSON Joseph - - - 2% 14% 41% 43%
68 CO Dylan - 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
69 WU Alexander - - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
70 TSAY Jeremy M. - 1% 5% 21% 39% 30% 4%
71 CHENG Jonathan - 1% 5% 19% 37% 31% 7%
72 MUSHER Benjamin J. - 4% 20% 36% 29% 9% 1%
73 OH SEAN - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 5%
74 LUH Ethan K. - - 2% 11% 31% 39% 17%
75 TORRES Treston 1% 11% 30% 35% 18% 4% -
76 LIU Eric Y. - 2% 9% 24% 35% 24% 6%
77 LING Eddie 1% 9% 27% 35% 21% 6% -
78 WANG Winston 1% 10% 33% 36% 17% 3% -
79 OH Jaden - 7% 27% 37% 22% 6% 1%
80 FUKUDA Renzo K. - - - 2% 12% 39% 48%
81 LIN James G. - - 1% 9% 31% 44% 14%
82 GONG Benjamin - - 3% 15% 36% 36% 10%
83 ELWOOD Sebastian F. - 2% 11% 29% 36% 19% 3%
84 SONG Bryan - 2% 11% 29% 36% 19% 3%
84 BADLANI Dev - 6% 22% 36% 27% 8% 1%
86 DETERING Julian - 1% 7% 22% 36% 27% 7%
87 LI Samuel 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4% -
88 GUO Sean - 4% 16% 32% 32% 14% 2%
89 KNIZHNIK David 1% 6% 21% 34% 28% 10% 1%
90 MIALL Steven A. 1% 6% 19% 33% 28% 12% 2%
90 MIN Eric - 2% 9% 27% 37% 21% 4%
92 BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. 4% 20% 34% 28% 12% 2% -
93 KIAYIAS Aris 7% 28% 37% 22% 6% 1% -
94 LIN Michael - 1% 8% 24% 35% 25% 7%
95 JAIN Aditya - - 2% 12% 33% 38% 14%
96 DORE Davis 2% 10% 27% 34% 21% 6% -
97 ROSE Ben - 4% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
98 LEE Lukas 1% 7% 27% 40% 21% 4% -
99 JI Aidan Y. - 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
100 LEWIS Akhil - 4% 17% 33% 30% 13% 2%
100 VALOUEV Aleksey - 2% 13% 31% 35% 16% 2%
102 KIM Ryan Y. - 1% 6% 22% 39% 29% 4%
103 PALMA Matthew Dominic - 3% 13% 30% 34% 17% 3%
104 KIM Andrew J. - 1% 11% 30% 37% 18% 3%
105 PAE Brian L. 2% 13% 30% 32% 17% 5% -
105 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. - 2% 11% 31% 36% 18% 3%
107 DORAN Wesley C. - - 1% 7% 25% 41% 26%
108 TIKHAEV Alexander 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
109 WONG Garrick G. - - 5% 21% 39% 29% 6%
110 MOHAMED Murad 1% 9% 25% 33% 23% 8% 1%
111 SISINNI Riccardo - 2% 12% 30% 36% 18% 2%
112 GUO Justin - 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 1%
113 TRAUGOT Owen G. - 3% 15% 33% 34% 13% 1%
114 LIU Derek 6% 23% 35% 25% 10% 2% -
115 KNOEPFFLER Alex - 2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2%
116 TAN Peter 1% 13% 33% 34% 15% 3% -
117 LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4% -
118 SAGE Michael P. - 4% 18% 33% 30% 13% 2%
119 HOSKERI Anik S. 1% 11% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
120 QIAN Jason H. 2% 11% 28% 33% 20% 6% 1%
120 FINNEY Lorenz - 7% 27% 37% 22% 6% 1%
122 WANG Ethan 3% 20% 40% 27% 8% 1% -
123 LEE Christopher T. 1% 11% 30% 35% 18% 4% -
124 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. 1% 6% 21% 35% 27% 9% 1%
125 MA Bryant 3% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
126 WONG Jackson 12% 32% 33% 17% 5% 1% -
127 FUKUDA Diego 2% 15% 36% 32% 13% 2% -
128 SHAO Eric 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
129 NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. - - 3% 16% 35% 35% 10%
130 SIMA Congyu Josh 1% 8% 25% 35% 23% 7% 1%
131 WANG Mason - 5% 21% 38% 28% 7% -
132 TAHOUN Mostafa - 3% 15% 32% 33% 15% 2%
133 PLASTARAS Trey 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1% -
134 STRUGAR Marcus A. - 2% 10% 29% 37% 19% 2%
135 DINSAY Kristjan - 4% 17% 34% 32% 12% 1%
135 NICOLETTI Luca 1% 7% 25% 36% 23% 6% 1%
137 GOGOI Vir K. 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 7% 1%
138 EDWARDS Maxon 18% 38% 31% 11% 2% - -
139 LYU Victor - - 2% 12% 32% 38% 15%
140 WU Alistair 19% 41% 29% 10% 2% - -
141 NGUYEN Liam 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
142 MEJIA MATTHEW D. 3% 19% 37% 30% 11% 1%
143 TAN Christien - - 4% 17% 37% 34% 7%
144 RASMUSSEN Sage 5% 24% 39% 25% 7% 1% -
145 WANG Brayden 9% 32% 37% 18% 4% - -
146 LISONDRA Niko - 4% 19% 36% 30% 9% 1%
147 WONG Antonio - 5% 19% 35% 29% 10% 1%
148 PAN Henry 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2% -
149 LEVY Jacob 1% 16% 43% 31% 9% 1% -
150 LI Matthew 6% 26% 38% 23% 7% 1% -
151 LIPPMAN Sam 2% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1% -
151 TALASILA Arush 33% 42% 20% 5% 1% - -
153 LI Arvin 2% 13% 32% 33% 16% 3% -
154 MYERS Dean 4% 19% 36% 29% 10% 1% -
155 LYNCH Owen C. 5% 26% 39% 23% 6% 1% -
156 LO Preston 3% 20% 36% 29% 11% 2% -
157 PO Oliver - 5% 19% 34% 30% 11% 1%
157 KAPOOR Aayan 6% 26% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
159 SANTOS Carlos R. 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1% -
160 ZHENG Zhe 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 5% -
161 PITERBARG Maxim 2% 12% 31% 34% 18% 4% -
162 SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden 2% 15% 34% 32% 14% 3% -
162 LEE Jonah 1% 9% 28% 36% 21% 5% -
164 KIM Harrison 17% 37% 31% 12% 2% - -
165 TUAN Evan 19% 40% 29% 10% 2% - -
166 PONS Diego 19% 42% 29% 9% 1% - -
167 DE COQUET Maximilian 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
167 SETLUR Bhrugu 11% 34% 34% 16% 4% - -
169 SONG Austin 6% 27% 40% 22% 5% -
170 GOBBO Alexander - 4% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
170 DEDENBACH Joseph 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
172 RAJ Jay 2% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
173 CORTRIGHT Joshua C. 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
174 REEVES Liam - 4% 17% 35% 32% 11% 1%
175 ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) 8% 29% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
176 ORLOV Dmitriy 1% 7% 23% 35% 25% 8% 1%
177 ROSS III Paul D. 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
178 CHEN Charlie Tian-You - 3% 16% 35% 33% 12% 1%
179 ZHEN Ethan - 5% 20% 36% 29% 9% -
180 LIU Michael H. 1% 5% 18% 32% 29% 13% 2%
181 CORTRIGHT Skipper 2% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
181 ZHANG Aaron 1% 7% 23% 36% 25% 8% 1%
183 OLSON Emerson 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% - -
184 NICOLL William 9% 29% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
185 SMITH Grant D. 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
185 CHEN Kyle P. 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3% -
187 PARK Gabriel 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
188 SHAPIRO Leon 26% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
189 TONKOVICH Ryan 33% 41% 20% 5% 1% - -
190 LIU Ryan 33% 41% 20% 5% 1% - -
191 SHEN Owen 2% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
192 GUTH Joseph 6% 27% 38% 22% 6% 1% -
193 MATSAKH Philip 3% 20% 37% 28% 10% 1% -
194 PAI Lakshan K. 3% 18% 37% 30% 11% 1%
195 TANG Albert 24% 44% 26% 6% 1% -
196 KHER Roan 2% 12% 31% 34% 17% 4% -
197 PARK Sky 6% 24% 35% 25% 9% 1% -
198 CAPRA Ethan 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
199 ZHAO Bowen 12% 36% 34% 15% 3% - -
200 FLYNN Ian - 5% 21% 38% 28% 7% -
201 CHOE Jayden K. 12% 32% 33% 17% 5% 1% -
201 NGUYEN Martin 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
201 TJON Calum 39% 41% 17% 3% - - -
204 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 9% 34% 36% 17% 4% - -
204 HSIAO Nicholas 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
206 TSAO Lukas 1% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% 1%
207 STRINGER David 10% 32% 36% 17% 4% - -
208 RENTERIA Emiliano - 4% 22% 41% 26% 7% 1%
209 UNGERER Roger M. 15% 44% 32% 9% 1% - -
209 BARRETT Austin 8% 44% 36% 10% 1% - -
209 LI Aaron 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% - -
212 WECHSLER Jacob 1% 6% 21% 35% 28% 10% 1%
213 HUANG Eythan 8% 31% 38% 19% 4% - -
214 SENIC Lucas 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
215 LLIDO Soren 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
215 KETTELLE John 29% 46% 21% 4% - - -
215 EDISON Ansel 31% 43% 21% 4% - - -
218 RNO Kyler 16% 41% 33% 10% 1% - -
218 LI Ayren 5% 34% 39% 18% 4% - -
220 SANCHEZ Emanuel 29% 44% 22% 4% - - -
221 XU Ethan 8% 31% 40% 18% 3% - -
222 ZOU Yuming 30% 44% 21% 4% - - -
223 LEE Eugene 43% 42% 13% 2% - - -
224 MCKINLEY Luke 72% 26% 2% - - - -
225 TKACHUK Daniel 39% 42% 16% 3% - - -
226 TANG August L. 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4% -
226 TEH Ryan 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% - -
228 LI Jett 23% 44% 27% 6% 1% -
229 FRANK Amir 52% 37% 10% 1% - - -
229 ANDRIC Borna 1% 8% 27% 36% 22% 5% -
231 REZA Farazi 44% 40% 14% 2% - -
232 NICOLL James 16% 37% 32% 13% 2% - -
232 XU Andy P. 5% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1% -
232 MCISAAC Finn 20% 41% 28% 9% 1% - -
235 GOKCE Ellis 70% 27% 3% - - - -
236 LE Jacob H. 31% 46% 19% 3% - - -
237 WU Alber Y. 8% 28% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
238 AGRAWAL Niki 49% 39% 11% 1% - - -
238 IVANENKO Alex 29% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
238 FU Steven 54% 36% 9% 1% - - -
238 BOYKO Miles 43% 40% 14% 2% - - -
242 LEE Brendan 7% 26% 35% 23% 8% 1% -
242 FANG Jaden 22% 41% 27% 8% 1% - -
244 WANG Brian 21% 41% 28% 9% 1% - -
245 RAJPAL Alastair 27% 42% 24% 6% 1% - -
245 CHIN Ryan 30% 43% 21% 5% 1% - -
245 SONG Noel 19% 38% 30% 11% 2% - -
245 FOURNET-FAYARD Aldric 45% 40% 13% 2% - - -
249 UHLIG Cole 36% 42% 18% 4% - - -
250 KIM Brian 23% 39% 27% 9% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.