Capitol Clash SYC & RCC with Non-Regional Veteran and Y8

Y-12 Men's Épée

Sunday, February 3, 2019 at 8:00 AM

National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 PARK Ian C. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 42%
2 SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 46%
3 JEYOON Ryan S. 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 33% 5%
3 LEE Daniel Y. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 57%
5 GOLDFINE Ian J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 39%
6 MACARTY Jordan T. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 52%
7 LEE Noah 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 32%
8 MUMMIDI Rishi 100% 92% 56% 19% 3% - -
9 GIUSSANI Edoardo 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 27% 3%
10 BORODITSKY Ethan 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 77% 31%
10 LEONE Charles D. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 13%
12 GOHEL Dayus T. 100% 100% 97% 79% 39% 7%
13 AGAON Shawn 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 17%
14 ZENG Zihan 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 46% 9%
15 LONCAR Luka E. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 63%
16 BUROVSKY Maxim 100% 100% 98% 84% 51% 16% 2%
17 AGAON Ethan 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 53% 16%
18 SALERNO Gaetano 100% 100% 96% 83% 55% 23% 4%
19 YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. 100% 100% 98% 89% 65% 30% 6%
20 JANG Elliot 100% 99% 93% 71% 35% 9% 1%
21 CAO Brad 100% 100% 93% 71% 36% 11% 1%
22 FRIEDMAN Leo D. 100% 100% 99% 89% 61% 23% 3%
23 LEE Shwan 100% 99% 90% 68% 36% 12% 2%
24 GUO Yilu 100% 99% 93% 72% 36% 9% 1%
25 DURKIN Tristan E. 100% 84% 46% 13% 2% -
26 WIMMER Nathaniel P. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 46%
27 CANO Marcos E. 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 18% 2%
28 KHANNA Nikhil 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 78% 28%
29 GLOGOWSKI Konrad 100% 98% 84% 48% 14% 2% -
30 JORDAN Anton 100% 83% 42% 11% 1% - -
31 KIM Byung 100% 99% 93% 72% 37% 11% 1%
32 SU Caleb 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 11% 1%
33 SCOFIELD Thien J. 100% 98% 83% 50% 17% 3% -
34 VACCARO Dominick J. 100% 93% 67% 33% 10% 1% -
35 KESTNER Jack 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 29%
36 KIM Prestin 100% 100% 95% 76% 43% 13% 1%
37 CHAMBLISS Logan C. 100% 100% 94% 70% 29% 5%
38 WEI Michael 100% 99% 88% 55% 19% 2% -
39 CAO Albert 100% 99% 89% 63% 30% 8% 1%
40 STICHMAN chase 100% 95% 74% 37% 9% 1% -
41 ILYAS Zakariya 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 33% 7%
42 KOKENGE Reid 100% 100% 97% 83% 52% 19% 3%
43 LOWENSTEIN Isaac 100% 99% 89% 64% 31% 8% 1%
44 NORTH Alexander M. 100% 97% 79% 47% 16% 3% -
45 ROBERTS Magnus 100% 100% 98% 91% 69% 36% 9%
46 KOBI Samuel 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 29% 5%
46 OTTO Nathaniel B. 100% 81% 42% 12% 2% - -
48 SNYDER Ari 100% 97% 82% 50% 19% 4% -
49 EMDEN André 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 54% 14%
50 LEE Seungwon 100% 99% 88% 58% 23% 4% -
51 WU Marcus 100% 100% 97% 81% 47% 14% 1%
52 ZHANG Kingston 100% 99% 91% 69% 37% 12% 2%
53 JUN Jaywu 100% 100% 97% 82% 43% 8%
54 HILBERT Gabriel E. 100% 63% 20% 3% - -
55 DACKO Alexander V. 100% 98% 85% 58% 27% 8% 1%
56 CHU Allan 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 18% 1%
57 LEE Samuel Y. 100% 100% 98% 85% 54% 18% 2%
58 LAZARRE Alex 100% 100% 99% 88% 54% 17% 2%
59 BERNARD Jack B. 100% 83% 45% 14% 2% - -
60 NGUYEN Tate 100% 99% 88% 58% 22% 4% -
61 TIKHOMIROV Theodore 100% 100% 97% 82% 50% 18% 3%
62 KIM Nathan 100% 97% 81% 49% 18% 3% -
63 SHARMA Om V. 100% 87% 54% 21% 5% 1% -
64 GUAN Nathan 100% 97% 84% 55% 23% 6% 1%
65 DILLE Jackson K. 100% 100% 100% 93% 67% 23%
66 NEAL John P. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 13%
67 DESTEFANO Julius 100% 100% 95% 79% 47% 17% 3%
68 CHENH Justin 100% 100% 95% 74% 36% 8% 1%
69 YEUNG Yun 100% 76% 35% 9% 1% - -
70 PARK Nicholas 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 10% 1%
71 ROSE Nicholas E. 100% 87% 50% 17% 3% - -
72 WALCH Logan 100% 99% 88% 61% 27% 7% 1%
73 PRABHAKAR Agasthya 100% 100% 97% 79% 42% 12% 1%
74 YAO Geoffrey B. 100% 99% 93% 69% 29% 4%
75 PARK Frederick 100% 85% 43% 11% 1% -
76 KRIVAK Blaise 100% 100% 97% 85% 58% 25% 5%
77 POLLOCK Ariel 100% 100% 96% 80% 49% 16% 2%
78 SINFUEGO Adrian 100% 99% 94% 75% 43% 15% 2%
79 FANG Hanning 100% 100% 97% 82% 50% 18% 3%
80 ROMERO KURI Carlos Alexander 100% 90% 62% 28% 8% 1% -
82 MCBRIDE Ryan J. 100% 100% 96% 77% 43% 13% 2%
83 JONES Aidan 100% 78% 35% 8% 1% - -
83 SUNG Oliver 100% 100% 97% 82% 50% 16% 1%
85 HIGGIN Matthew 100% 62% 20% 4% - - -
86 SEBASTIAN Alexander P. 100% 99% 87% 53% 17% 3% -
86 WONG Adrian 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 18% 3%
88 ZHENG Jerry 100% 95% 73% 37% 10% 1%
89 RALSTEN Alex 100% 98% 75% 33% 6% - -
90 SCHICK Adrian M. 100% 94% 60% 20% 3% - -
90 BRUCHEY Ian 100% 90% 52% 16% 3% - -
93 LOBSENZ Danny 100% 86% 48% 15% 2% - -
94 PENHOET Adrien E. 100% 87% 51% 16% 2% - -
94 ZHANG Andy 100% 94% 64% 25% 5% - -
96 CHIMOSKEY Finn D. 100% 100% 96% 82% 54% 22% 4%
97 WOLFE Alex 100% 93% 67% 30% 7% 1% -
98 HUBSCHER Max 100% 91% 63% 30% 8% 1% -
98 VAZQUEZ Luis 100% 96% 79% 46% 16% 3% -
100 MARTIN Maddox 100% 56% 16% 2% - - -
101 QUINTERO Julian 100% 80% 29% 5% - - -
102 LOISEAU Eliott 100% 98% 79% 39% 9% 1%
103 GINZBURG Adam 100% 89% 59% 25% 6% 1% -
104 GRENKE Wyatt 100% 84% 38% 7% - -
105 WITTENWYLER Henry 100% 95% 71% 29% 4% - -
106 KUBATIN Anton V. 100% 62% 17% 2% - - -
107 OLLMAN Edward V. 100% 87% 51% 16% 2% - -
107 BANSAL Arjun 100% 97% 80% 45% 13% 2% -
109 HONTZ Nathaniel 100% 83% 46% 15% 3% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.