Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 2 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% |
| 3 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 3 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 5 | LONCAR Luka E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 6 | AGAON Shawn | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 7 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Nicholas Z. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 9 | BORODITSKY Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 10 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 11 | CHAI Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 12 | SALERNO Gaetano | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 14% | |
| 13 | JUN Jaywu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 20% | |
| 15 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 16 | ZENG Zihan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 17 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 18 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 19 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 20 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | FRIEDMAN Leo D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 22 | CANO Marcos E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 23 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | - | |
| 24 | BEZRODNOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
| 25 | WEI Michael | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 26 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
| 28 | GUO Yilu | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 4% | |
| 29 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 30 | WEI Jonny | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 31 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | NORTH Alexander M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 33 | WU Marcus | 100% | 97% | 70% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | KOBI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | |
| 35 | LEE Hudson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 36 | MUSIENKO Alexander | 100% | 98% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 37 | AGAON Ethan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 38 | CAO Albert | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | THAKUR Om S. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | SKORUPAN Grant | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% |
| 41 | BHATIA Arav | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | CHOI Mason | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | DURKIN Tristan E. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 44 | CUI Oscar (Bo Lang) | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 45 | LI Matthew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 46 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 91% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | CAO Brad | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 48 | JANG Elliot | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | CHAMBLISS Logan C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 50 | ZHANG Braydon | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 51 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 52 | MONTOYA Gabriel | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 53 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 11% |
| 54 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | ARICO Trey | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 56 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | SUN James H. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 59 | KIM Prestin | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | CHAI Ethan | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | IVKOV Dmitriy | 100% | 91% | 64% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 63 | CHANG Benjamin | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 65 | IVKOV Alexander | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 66 | SOSNICK Samuel | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 68 | ZHANG Kingston | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 69 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 70 | HU Anton | 100% | 91% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | WANG Max S | 100% | 89% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 72 | HARNETT William | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 73 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.