May NAC

Cadet Men's Épée

Saturday, May 8, 2021 at 8:15 AM

Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 LAWSON Henry A. V V V V V D V V V V V V 5.4 5 -0.4
2 IYOKI Kent V V V V V D V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
3 FRAY Alexander V D V V D V V V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
3 PRASAD Ankith V V D D V V V V V V D 3.0 3 -
5 GIBSON Nowell L. V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
6 LIU Alexander V V V V V D V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
7 LIVERANT Skyler J. V V V V D V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
8 SHARMA Sanil D D V V V V V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
9 MOSES Alexander V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
10 JAYENDRA Chandrashekar V V V V D V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
11 SHAH S Ayush V V D D V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
12 TOWNSEND Avery S. V V V D D V V V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
13 JIN Nicholas V D D V V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
14 JEYOON Ryan S. V V V D V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
15 WIMMER Chandler M. V V D V D V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
16 SIVAKUMAR Ajit V D V V D V V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
17 WHELAN Thomas (Tony) V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
18 CHO Tyler H. V V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
19 PAPAVASSILIOU Christos V V V V D V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
20 IMREK Samuel A. D V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
21 SMITH Jackson V V D V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
22 FELDMAN Jaemin V V D V V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
23 SILVERS Noah E. D V V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
24 GANA Jr Jorge M. V V V D V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
25 INSLER Ethan C. D D V V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
26 BUYANOV Nikita V. V D V D V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
27 LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA V V D V D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
28 TUMIBAY Noah C. V V D D D V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
29 KARKI Salyan V V D D D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
30 LIN Ryan D V V V D D V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
31 CLICK Aiden V D D D V D V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
32 SKAALAND Will D D D V D V V D 1.6 1 -0.6
33 MA Ark V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
34 CHONG christopher V V V D V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
35 KIM Juni C. V V V D V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
36 LIN Kyran V V V V D V D 4.4 5 +0.6
37 YOUNG Peyton E. V V V V V D D 3.1 5 +1.9
38 LONCAR Luka E. V D V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
39 SHERWOOD Dominic D V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
40 GORIUNOV IVAN A. V V V D V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
41 NORBUTAS Jackson S. V V V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
42 KROPP Jack V V V V D D 2.9 4 +1.1
43 KUCZAJDA Matthew V D V V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
44 JEON Alexander E. V D V V D V D 5.0 4 -1.0
45 GREEN Ummi V D V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
46 LEE Alexander G. V V D D V V V D 4.0 4 -
47 KANG Philip F. V V V D V D V D 4.0 4 -
48 GRAY Sterling B. V D V V V D V D 4.1 4 -0.1
49 CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. V D V D V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
50 GARRETT Samuel V D V D V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
51 DIXON Thomas V V D V D V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
52 ROBINSON Riley V V D D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
53 LEE Daniel Y. V D V V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
54 WOZNIAK Ignacy V V D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
55 GOHEL Dayus T. V D V V D D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
56 RHYU Kozmo V D V D V D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
57 CHEN Eric D V V D V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
58 LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick V D V V D D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
59 GATZA Logan V D V D V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
59 PARK Brian D V V D D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
61 SHAH Maximilian A. D D D V V V D 2.0 2 -
62 LIOZNYANSKY Simon D D V D V D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
63 GOLDFINE Ian J. D V D V D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
64 LUCERO-OLSON Aydin D D D V D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
65 ZHU Max D D V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
66 COLLYMORE Spencer T. D V V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
67 MORSE Tyler D D V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
67 LIANG Aaron D V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
69 BINDAS Odinn A. V D V V D V D 2.0 4 +2.0
70 GYURE Brayden H. V D V D V D D 4.2 3 -1.2
71 HE Lawrence V D V V D D D 2.6 3 +0.4
72 LI Benjamin V V D V D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
73 SHIV Rishi V V D V D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
74 YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. D V D D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
75 BASOK Nikita V V D D V D D 2.0 3 +1.0
76 KIM Benjamin I. D D V V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
77 LI Patrick D V V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
78 WU Jason D D V D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
79 JIN Owen D V V D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
80 GREEN Jabreel D D V D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
81 SU Caleb D D D V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
81 JIN daniel V V D D D D 2.0 2 -
83 POPOVICI Maximilian P. D V V D D D 3.0 2 -1.0
84 MACARTY Jordan T. D D D V D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
85 CHU Allan D V D D V D D 2.0 2 -
86 LEHR William D. D D D D V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
87 AGAON Ethan D D D V V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
88 NORTH Alexander M. V D D D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
89 WIMMER Nathaniel P. D V D D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
90 ZHOU Stanley Q. D D D V V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
91 ZHENG Haoran V D D D V D D 1.5 2 +0.5
92 JUN Jaywu D V D D D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
93 AGAON Shawn D D V D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
94 OTTO Nathaniel B. D V D V D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
94 DENNIS Ethan D D D D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
96 ZHANG Caden V D V D D D D 0.5 2 +1.5
97 MCKEEVER Luca V D D D V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
98 CARRIER Gabriel A. D D D V V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
99 LIEF Isaac R. D D D V D D 1.8 1 -0.8
100 O'DONNELL Benjamin D V D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
101 DUAN eric D V D D D D 1.0 1 -
102 KIM Tei D. D D D V D D 3.4 1 -2.4
102 KIM Ryan D V D D D D 0.5 1 +0.5
104 TORRES Nicolas D D D D D V 0.9 1 +0.1
105 GALLO James D D V D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
106 KWOUN Miles S. D V D D D D 0.4 1 +0.6
107 CAO Albert D V D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
108 HILBERT Gabriel E. D D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
108 YAO Geoffrey B. D D D V D D 1.4 1 -0.4
110 LEE JoonWon D D D D V D 0.4 1 +0.6
111 DILLE Jackson K. D D D V D D 1.9 1 -0.9
112 JACKSON James D D D V D D 1.9 1 -0.9
113 THOMPSON Chester D D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
114 WANG DEVON D D D V D D 2.3 1 -1.3
115 PHUKAN Rohin D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
116 ROTHKA Spencer J. D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
117 CROSSMAN Brandon D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
118 SEBASTIAN Alexander P. D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
119 HU Robert J. D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
119 MUGA Aiden D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
121 KIM Sullivan D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
122 KHANNA Nikhil D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.