Raleigh SJCC & Division II North American Cup

Junior Men's Épée

Friday, June 2, 2023 at 1:00 PM

Raleigh Convention Center - Raleigh, NC, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 JIN Owen V V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.0 6 +1.0
2 WIMMER Nathaniel P. V V D V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
3 DENNIS Ethan V V V V V V V V V V V D 3.2 6 +2.8
3 LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick V D V D D V V V V V V D 5.2 3 -2.2
5 LEE Samuel Y. V D V V V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
6 KOKENGE Reid V V V V D V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
7 GORIUNOV IVAN A. V D V V V D V V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
8 STRAUSS Luke D V V D D V V V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
9 SIVAKUMAR Ajit V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
10 GAO Daniel V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
11 YAO Geoffrey B. V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
12 CLICK Aiden V V V V V D V V V D 5.0 5 -
13 BRISLAWN Reilly R. V V V V D V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
14 LEE Seungwon D V V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
15 JEYOON Ryan S. V D V V V D V V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
16 O'DONNELL Benjamin V D D V V D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
17 MAZUR Daniil V V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
18 CHOI Mason V V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
19 HEADRICK Lance V V V V V V V V D 3.4 6 +2.6
20 ZHANG Caden V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
21 CARRIER Gabriel A. V V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
22 KIM Byung V D V V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
23 PARK Frederick V V D V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
24 CHAWLA Armaan D V D V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
25 KIM Benjamin I. D D V V V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
26 CHEN Eric V V V D D V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
27 SEBASTIAN Alexander P. V D V D V V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
28 IARIKOV Nicholas D V V V V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
29 ZHAO Corey D V D V V D V V D 4.4 3 -1.4
30 SAVORETTI Francesco D D D V D V V V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
31 MEGGERS Davin D D D D V V V V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
32 WU Byron D D D D V V V V D 3.5 1 -2.5
33 KHANNA Nikhil V V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
34 WOLFE Alex V V V V D V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
35 NIKOLOV Peter D V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
36 LIOZNYANSKY Simon D V D V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
36 ROMANOV Ethan D V V V D V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
38 SHCHUR Landon D V V V V D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
39 DESTEFANO Julius V D V V V D V D 4.7 4 -0.7
40 RHYU Kozmo V D V V V D V D 5.0 4 -1.0
40 KIM Taeho V V V V D D V D 1.9 4 +2.1
42 PARK Nicholas D V V D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
43 RICHARDS Jackson D. D D V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
44 JIN Nicholas V V D D V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
45 LIN Kyran D V V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
46 GAO Chaney C. D D V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
47 MAO Benjamin V D V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
48 TREBON Hayden V V D D V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
49 BUI Henry D V V D V V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
50 KOYFMAN Benjamin D V D V V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
51 GOHEL Dayus T. V V V D D D V D 5.0 3 -2.0
52 PRIHODKO Max V D V D V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
53 MURPHY Thomas P. D D V V D V V D 4.6 3 -1.6
54 KUMAR Aidan D V V D D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
55 WANG Aidan V D D V D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
56 HILBERT Gabriel E. V V D V D D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
56 LI Benjamin D V D D V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
58 LIN Harrison V V V D D D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
59 ALI Farhan V V D D V D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
60 BHATNAGAR Ayan D V V D D D V V D 4.3 2 -2.3
60 EVERS Gabriel D D V D V D V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
62 SPINA Joseph B. D D V V D D V V D 3.2 2 -1.2
63 GIOVAGNOLI Nolan V D D D D D V V D 2.1 1 -1.1
64 SNYDER Ari D D D D D D V V D 1.8 0 -1.8
65 DAO Matthew M. V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
66 MACARTY Jordan T. V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
67 WU Jonathan V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
68 HE Lawrence V V V V D V D 4.8 5 +0.2
69 HE Zhiheng V V D V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
70 MUGA Aiden V D V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
71 LAI Aedin V V V V V D D 3.5 5 +1.5
72 TIYA BIAYA K. V V D V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
73 ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) V V V D D V D 2.3 4 +1.7
74 CHEN Brian V V V D V D D 3.2 4 +0.8
75 FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. D V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
76 KIM Nathan D V V V D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
77 ZHANG Andy D V D V V V D 1.1 4 +2.9
78 MODULLA Yathin R. V V V D V D D 2.8 4 +1.2
79 HU Robert J. D V V D V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
79 MEN Junda V D V V D V D 1.6 4 +2.4
81 ZOU Xianyang (Max) D V D V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
82 DODIN David D V V V V D D 3.9 4 +0.1
83 ZHOU Stanley Q. V V V D D V D 3.7 4 +0.3
84 SCHARF Ryan V V D D V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
85 SHA Michael V V V D V D D 3.5 4 +0.5
86 LONGSTREET Jeffrey D V V V D D 2.3 3 +0.7
87 SAVORETTI Pietro V D D V V D 1.1 3 +1.9
88 SINGH Aryaman V V V D D D D 2.9 3 +0.1
89 ARAVIND Athreya V D V D V D D 3.2 3 -0.2
90 MING Nathan V D D V V D D 2.4 3 +0.6
91 HENSAL Nicolas A. V D V D V D D 5.1 3 -2.1
92 MIAO KUNQI V V V D D D D 2.3 3 +0.7
93 KIM Dylan J. V V V D D D D 4.3 3 -1.3
94 LAM Alan D D V V V D D 2.4 3 +0.6
95 JORDAN Anton D V D V D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
95 BERNARD Jack B. D D V D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
97 ROLLO Emmett H. D D V D V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
98 CLICK Tristan V D D V D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
99 REPIC Oliver V V D D D V D 1.5 3 +1.5
100 CHOI Kaiden I. D V V D V D D 3.0 3 -
101 KUO Garrett V D V D V D D 2.1 3 +0.9
102 ZIEGLER John V D D D V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
103 WALLACE James V V D D V D D 1.9 3 +1.1
104 YANG Boyan V D V V D D D 3.6 3 -0.6
105 SVERDLOV Seth V V D D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
106 KWOUN Miles S. D D V D V D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
107 BARG Jonathan D D D V D V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
107 MCADOO Declan D D V D D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
109 KROPP Jack D V D D V D V D 4.3 2 -2.3
110 SAKO Ayrton J. D V D D D V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
111 TIKHOMIROV Theodore D D D V D V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
112 FU Leon V D D D D V V D 4.3 2 -2.3
113 CHENH Justin D V D D D V V D 0.8 2 +1.2
114 STEPHENS Corbin V D V D D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
115 LAI Boden D V D D V D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
116 STELTENKAMP Neal V D D D V D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
117 MITEV Alexander D D V V D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
118 WANG zhixing (Daniel） D D V V D D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
119 PRAKASH Hari D V D D D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
120 GLENNON Sebastian J. D V D V D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
121 PAHLAVI Kamran D V D D D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
122 LEE Damien D V D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
123 CHAKRABORTY Zorian D D D V D D V D 0.9 1 +0.1
124 DAO Alexander D D D V D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
125 RACHEL Dylan D D D V D D V D 2.7 1 -1.7
126 LEONE III Charles D. V D D D D D V D 3.2 1 -2.2
127 SO Lorenzo D D D D V D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
128 KIM Ian D D D D D D V D 2.5 0 -2.5
129 CHEN Jun Ho D V D V D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
130 WANG Clayton V D V D D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
131 DURKIN Tristan E. V D D D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
132 PAN Tristan D D V D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
133 SINGH Ravin D V D V D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
134 LOISEAU Eliott V D D D V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
135 ARMSTRONG TyLee D D D V V D D 0.8 2 +1.2
136 TIKHONOV Iliya D D V D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
137 BUERGISSER Kai D D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
138 LEE JoonWon V D D D D D D 3.1 1 -2.1
139 VACCARO Dominick J. D D D V D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
140 SOKOL Luke V D D D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
141 EMMERT JP D V D D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
142 CHIN Dylan A. D D D D V D D 2.7 1 -1.7
143 KRISHNAN Skanda D V D D D D D 1.0 1 -
144 TIKHONOV Daniel V D D D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
145 SLOUGH Sean D D D D D V D 3.0 1 -2.0
146 HU Anton D D D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
147 WONG King-Yee D D D D V D D 1.3 1 -0.3
148 DAN Rex V D D D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
149 BANNEN Nicholas D V D D D D D 1.0 1 -
149 ZHANG Roland D D D V D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
151 FANG Hanning D D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
152 TATE William Isom D D D D V D D 0.9 1 +0.1
153 AYOTTE James D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
153 LEE DoWon D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
155 BEAVER Aaron D D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
156 KIM Joshua D D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
157 MCDANIEL Eamon D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
158 PALAMARCHUK Matthew D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
159 HE Lingyun Matthew D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
160 ROSS Connor D D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.