Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LONCAR Luka E. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
2 | PRASAD Ankith | D V V D V | V V V V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
3 | JIN Nicholas | D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
3 | GAO Daniel | D D V V V | V V V V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
5 | GOLDFINE Ian J. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
6 | LIN Kyran | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
7 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | V V D D V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
8 | STRAUSS Luke | D V D D V | V V V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
9 | MACARTY Jordan T. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
10 | CHONG christopher | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
11 | CLICK Aiden | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
12 | KATS Dylan G. | V D V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
13 | KOKENGE Reid | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
14 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | D V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
15 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | V D V D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
16 | PRIHODKO Max | V V D D V | V V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
17 | YOUNG Peyton E. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
18 | GOHEL Dayus T. | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
19 | BINDAS Odinn A. | V V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
20 | KUMAR Aidan | V V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
21 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | V V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
22 | PARK Ian C. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
23 | KHANNA Nikhil | D V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
24 | KUDRIAVTCEV Sergei | V D V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
25 | SU Caleb | V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
26 | LIEF Isaac R. | V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
27 | JEYOON Ryan S. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
28 | KIM Dylan J. | V D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
29 | JIN daniel | V D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
30 | BEZRODNOV Michael | D V V D D V | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
31 | PHUKAN Rohin | D D V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
32 | KIM Tei D. | D D V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
33 | LEE Shwan | V V V D V V | D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
34 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | V V D V V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
35 | LEE Noah | V V V D V V | D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
36 | AGAON Shawn | V V V V D D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
37 | CHOI Mason | V D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
38 | LI Patrick | V V D V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
39 | SONG Alexander | V D V V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
40 | CAO Brad | D V V V V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
41 | LAI Aiden | D V V V V D | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
42 | LEE Seungwon | V D V D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
43 | KOBI Samuel | V V V D D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
44 | GALLO James | V D V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
45 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
46 | NORTH Alexander M. | V D D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
47 | LEE Daniel Y. | D D V V V D | V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
48 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | D D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
49 | SCHULZE Ethan | D V V D V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
50 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | D D V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
51 | ZHENG Haoran | D V V V D D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
52 | CHU Allan | V V D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
53 | TORRES Nicolas | D V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
54 | VEZMAR Evan H. | D V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
55 | CAO Albert | V D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
56 | IMREK Elijah S. | D D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
57 | DESTEFANO Julius | V V D D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
58 | YAO Geoffrey B. | D D V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
59 | AGAON Ethan | V D D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
60 | SATTERFIELD Donald | D D D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
61 | JORDAN Anton | V D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
62 | WANG DEVON | V D D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
63 | MURPHY Thomas P. | V D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
64 | WANG Clayton | D D V D D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
65 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
66 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
67 | LOISEAU Eliott | D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
68 | DUAN eric | D D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
69 | NIKOLOV Peter | V D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
69 | XIAO Andrew | D V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
71 | LEE Samuel Y. | D D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
72 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | V V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
73 | HU Robert J. | V D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
74 | CLICK Tristan | V D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
75 | BERNARD Jack B. | D D V D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
76 | WRIGHT Christopher | D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
77 | LEE JoonWon | D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
77 | WOLFE Alex | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
79 | PARKS Isaac | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
80 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
81 | ZHANG Andy | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
82 | XIA Oliver | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
83 | POIST Wylie | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
84 | SONN Rohan | D D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
85 | KIM Sullivan | D D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
86 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
87 | GRENKE Wyatt | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
88 | MUGA Aiden | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
89 | PAK Elliot | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
90 | BAZHENOV Anthony | D D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
91 | GAO Zachary | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
92 | KWOUN Miles S. | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.