June NAC

Junior Men's Épée

Friday, June 4, 2021 at 9:15 AM

, - Richmond, VA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SZAPARY Tristan B. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 51%
2 KUSHNERIK Ethan 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 41%
3 DOLGONOS Mark 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 41%
3 HANSEN Jonas B. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 62%
5 SPITERI Gareth J. 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 54% 17%
6 VAYSBUKH Konstantin 100% 99% 92% 71% 39% 12% 2%
7 KUMASHI Mihir R. 100% 100% 100% 96% 82% 50% 15%
8 ZAFFT Maximo S. 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 20% 3%
9 LIVERANT Skyler J. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 31%
10 GRABER Andrew J. 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 9%
11 RUSSANOV Dennis 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 26% 4%
12 MA Ark 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 27%
13 WEISS Miles J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 60%
14 WIMMER Chandler M. 100% 100% 97% 83% 52% 19% 2%
15 LEE Ryan 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 17%
16 SHENG Patrick Y. 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 19% 2%
17 VERMEULE Spencer 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 38%
18 ANDREEV Arthur 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 17%
19 CANDELA Nicholas 100% 100% 99% 94% 76% 42% 11%
20 PAVLENISHVILI David G. 100% 100% 98% 90% 68% 33% 7%
21 IYOKI Kent 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 21%
22 GIBSON Nowell L. 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 35% 7%
23 LAWSON Henry A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 53%
24 SILVERS Noah E. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 19%
25 PARK Ian C. 100% 98% 85% 56% 24% 6% 1%
25 SIVAKUMAR Ajit 100% 100% 96% 79% 47% 15% 1%
27 FEINBERG Gabriel M. 100% 100% 100% 98% 90% 66% 26%
28 WU Byron 100% 96% 70% 32% 8% 1% -
29 CANDREVA Hunter R. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 19%
30 GOHEL Dayus T. 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 4% -
31 DIXON Thomas 100% 94% 71% 36% 11% 2% -
32 IMREK Samuel A. 100% 100% 97% 81% 49% 17% 3%
33 LAWSON Nicholas W. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 54%
34 RHYU Kozmo 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 28% 5%
35 SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. 100% 100% 98% 85% 55% 22% 4%
36 DAO Matthew M. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 15%
37 BEKKER Mitchel 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 25% 3%
38 WALSH Kevin 100% 100% 96% 75% 36% 7%
39 MUGA Boris 100% 97% 78% 43% 13% 1%
40 BINDAS Odinn A. 100% 96% 60% 18% 2% -
41 WHELAN Thomas (Tony) 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 36%
42 MOOSEKIAN Stafford 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 24%
42 KAMBESELES Peter G. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 14%
44 LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 22% 3%
45 ZHU Max 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 15% 2%
46 MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. 100% 100% 93% 66% 29% 7% 1%
47 LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick 100% 100% 95% 74% 39% 12% 2%
48 HADDAD Justin R. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 53%
48 GAIDAR Daniel B. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 27%
50 LEE Daniel Y. 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 22% 3%
51 SLAVINSKIY Alan 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 33% 7%
52 KRAVIT Connor B. 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 34% 7%
53 ROGAK Benjamin A. 100% 100% 100% 94% 66% 19%
54 KOKENGE Clark 100% 100% 96% 76% 38% 7%
55 WALKER IV Weymouth D. 100% 98% 83% 48% 14% 2%
56 LEHR William D. 100% 99% 92% 70% 36% 10% 1%
57 LONCAR Luka E. 100% 100% 96% 81% 50% 18% 3%
58 SHERWOOD Dominic 100% 94% 69% 35% 11% 2% -
59 KROPP Jack 100% 99% 88% 56% 19% 2%
60 YOUNG Peyton E. 100% 100% 93% 66% 26% 4%
61 BRISLAWN Reilly R. 100% 100% 98% 85% 55% 22% 3%
62 GLAZ Nicholas S. 100% 100% 94% 71% 35% 9% 1%
63 JIN Owen 100% 99% 93% 70% 35% 9% 1%
64 KIM Ethan J. 100% 100% 95% 79% 47% 17% 2%
65 LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 14% 2%
66 LIU Alexander 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 27%
67 ELLIS Yehia S. 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 37% 8%
68 MARAKOV Allen B. 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 23%
69 SITBON-TAYLOR Noe B. 100% 99% 92% 69% 34% 9% 1%
70 ZHANG Joshua 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 32%
71 SMITH William K. 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 27% 5%
72 SHIV Rishi 100% 96% 74% 39% 12% 2% -
73 SHARMA Sanil 100% 99% 91% 66% 28% 4%
74 LEE Timothy S. 100% 100% 94% 72% 35% 9% 1%
75 SMITH Nicholas S. 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 10% 1%
76 XU Zitong (Evan) 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 34% 7%
77 HE Lawrence 100% 93% 64% 26% 6% 1% -
78 LIN Ryan 100% 100% 98% 90% 65% 29% 5%
79 JAIN Sarthak 100% 89% 59% 25% 7% 1% -
80 LEE Alexander G. 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 25% 4%
81 ZHENG Hagen 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 39% 9%
82 KIM Dylan J. 100% 96% 68% 28% 6% 1% -
83 O'HARA Keegan J. 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 20% 2%
84 JEONG Connor 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 18%
85 SMITH Jackson 100% 96% 78% 42% 12% 1%
86 USHER Alexander 100% 96% 75% 40% 12% 2% -
87 SPIER Julian H. 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 38% 8%
88 HENSAL Nicolas A. 100% 99% 89% 56% 20% 4% -
89 WASHBOURNE Robert A. 100% 84% 49% 18% 4% - -
89 INSLER Ethan C. 100% 100% 98% 86% 58% 24% 4%
91 SCHULTZ Alex 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 20% 3%
92 LEE Shwan 100% 99% 88% 57% 23% 5% -
92 JEYOON Ryan S. 100% 97% 80% 47% 17% 3% -
94 YUMIACO Nolan C. 100% 100% 92% 65% 29% 7% 1%
95 GAO Daniel 100% 95% 73% 39% 12% 2% -
96 GANA Jr Jorge M. 100% 100% 98% 84% 54% 20% 3%
96 YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. 100% 96% 77% 44% 15% 2% -
96 SHAH S Ayush 100% 99% 91% 68% 34% 10% 1%
96 GUI Runlin 100% 98% 87% 60% 27% 6% -
96 CUMMINGS Kai 100% 100% 94% 71% 35% 9% 1%
101 CAO Albert 100% 66% 24% 5% - - -
102 JAYENDRA Chandrashekar 100% 99% 94% 75% 41% 12% 1%
102 LI Brian X 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 9% 1%
104 GORIUNOV IVAN A. 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 23% 4%
105 YUROVCHAK Andrew T. 100% 100% 95% 76% 41% 12% 1%
106 LEONE III Charles D. 100% 96% 76% 42% 14% 3% -
107 GREEN Ummi 100% 99% 93% 70% 35% 9% 1%
107 LIU John 100% 99% 92% 71% 37% 10% 1%
107 STEVENS Daniel 100% 98% 87% 58% 24% 5% -
110 IVAKIMOV Vasil 100% 99% 94% 75% 43% 14% 2%
111 MISHIMA Torata 100% 97% 80% 46% 16% 3% -
112 CHONG christopher 100% 100% 93% 62% 20% 2%
113 WICKBOLDT Eric 100% 90% 56% 19% 3% -
114 KIM William M. 100% 96% 74% 38% 10% 1%
115 ROTHKA Spencer J. 100% 41% 7% 1% - -
116 KIM Benjamin I. 100% 99% 91% 60% 22% 3%
117 LUKANYUK Lorence 100% 99% 78% 35% 7% -
118 ADLER Ethan M. 100% 90% 58% 22% 4% -
119 JIN Nicholas 100% 99% 93% 72% 38% 10% 1%
120 KUCZAJDA Matthew 100% 92% 64% 30% 8% 1% -
121 PARK Frederick 100% 92% 49% 13% 2% - -
122 PRASAD Ankith 100% 99% 91% 69% 35% 10% 1%
123 PHILLIPS Jeffrey T. 100% 98% 86% 56% 23% 5% -
124 CLICK Aiden 100% 100% 91% 64% 29% 7% 1%
125 GREEN Jabreel 100% 96% 77% 43% 14% 2% -
126 POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. 100% 78% 36% 9% 1% - -
127 VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik 100% 99% 88% 57% 22% 5% -
128 KANG Philip F. 100% 95% 74% 37% 9% 1%
129 HIGGINS Branford 100% 84% 48% 17% 4% - -
130 RODNEY Maxwell 100% 99% 87% 58% 24% 5% -
131 CHU Allan 100% 88% 55% 21% 5% 1% -
132 GYURE Brayden H. 100% 99% 94% 74% 40% 11% 1%
133 PARK Brian 100% 98% 76% 37% 10% 1% -
134 CHAWLA Armaan 100% 98% 79% 39% 11% 2% -
135 GATZA Logan 100% 100% 97% 78% 40% 11% 1%
136 CROSSMAN Brandon 100% 27% 3% - - - -
137 SIMPSON Patrick 100% 85% 48% 15% 2% -
137 ZHENG Haoran 100% 92% 53% 16% 2% -
139 LIANG Aaron 100% 88% 55% 20% 4% -
140 JORDAN Anton 100% 62% 20% 3% - -
141 MORSE Tyler 100% 98% 86% 55% 21% 4% -
142 COLLYMORE Spencer T. 100% 99% 89% 64% 31% 9% 1%
143 WONG Daniel 100% 89% 53% 19% 4% - -
144 LAI Coby 100% 97% 79% 44% 15% 2% -
145 CHEN Eric 100% 94% 67% 28% 6% 1% -
146 SHA Michael 100% 61% 21% 4% - - -
147 WONG NICHOLAS A. 100% 98% 88% 62% 30% 8% 1%
148 KOBI Samuel 100% 87% 53% 20% 4% - -
149 BLUM Oliver 100% 61% 19% 3% - - -
149 MCKEEVER Luca 100% 89% 56% 21% 4% - -
151 CHIRASHNYA Adam 100% 38% 6% - - - -
152 CHILANA Savitoz (Savi) 100% 98% 82% 47% 15% 2% -
152 MOSES Alexander 100% 99% 94% 75% 43% 14% 2%
154 HARR Carver 100% 87% 40% 9% 1% - -
155 BHATNAGAR Ayan 100% 85% 51% 19% 4% - -
156 EMARA Omar 100% 90% 61% 27% 7% 1% -
156 JOSEPH William 100% 97% 69% 29% 6% 1% -
158 WEAVER Neil 100% 83% 45% 13% 2% -
159 LEE Seungwon 100% 84% 48% 16% 3% - -
160 FELDMAN Jaemin 100% 94% 69% 34% 10% 2% -
161 DAVIS Jonah 100% 24% 2% - - -
162 JOO Benjamin 100% 78% 37% 10% 2% - -
163 KARKI Salyan 100% 72% 31% 7% 1% - -
163 PRAKASH Hari 100% 27% 3% - - - -
165 WANG Tristan 100% 74% 33% 8% 1% - -
166 VALES Keyan 100% 78% 37% 9% 1% - -
167 LEE JoonWon 100% 45% 9% 1% - - -
167 DIVERIS Joseph 100% 40% 6% - - - -
167 CHEN Jun Ho 100% 35% 5% - - - -
170 AGARWAL Adheesh 100% 24% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.