Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LONCAR Luka E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 24% |
| 2 | PRASAD Ankith | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
| 3 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
| 3 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
| 5 | GOLDFINE Ian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 6 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | |
| 7 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
| 8 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 9 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 11% | |
| 10 | CHONG christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 11 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 62% | 29% | 6% |
| 12 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 13 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 14 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
| 15 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | |
| 16 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 17 | YOUNG Peyton E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 18 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 19 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 21 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 23 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | KUDRIAVTCEV Sergei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
| 25 | SU Caleb | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 26 | LIEF Isaac R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 17% | |
| 27 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 14% |
| 28 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
| 30 | BEZRODNOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 25% | 5% |
| 31 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 32 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 33 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
| 34 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% |
| 35 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 31% |
| 36 | AGAON Shawn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% |
| 37 | CHOI Mason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 2% |
| 38 | LI Patrick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 39 | SONG Alexander | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 40 | CAO Brad | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | LAI Aiden | 100% | 87% | 43% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
| 43 | KOBI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 44 | GALLO James | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
| 45 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 46 | NORTH Alexander M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 47 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 48 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 49 | SCHULZE Ethan | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 92% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | CHU Allan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 53 | TORRES Nicolas | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | VEZMAR Evan H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 55 | CAO Albert | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 56 | IMREK Elijah S. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
| 57 | DESTEFANO Julius | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% |
| 58 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 59 | AGAON Ethan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 60 | SATTERFIELD Donald | 100% | 91% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 61 | JORDAN Anton | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 62 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
| 63 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
| 64 | WANG Clayton | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 65 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 66 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 67 | LOISEAU Eliott | 100% | 97% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 68 | DUAN eric | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 69 | NIKOLOV Peter | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 69 | XIAO Andrew | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 71 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 72 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 73 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 74 | CLICK Tristan | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 76 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 77 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 77 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 79 | PARKS Isaac | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 80 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 81 | ZHANG Andy | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 82 | XIA Oliver | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | POIST Wylie | 100% | 95% | 76% | 45% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 84 | SONN Rohan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 85 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 59% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 86 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | 100% | 94% | 63% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 87 | GRENKE Wyatt | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 88 | MUGA Aiden | 100% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 89 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 81% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 91 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 92 | KWOUN Miles S. | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.