Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Nicholas Z. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 2 | CHONG christopher | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 3 | GATZA Logan | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 3 | CLICK Aiden | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 5 | IMREK Samuel A. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
| 6 | RHYU Kozmo | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 7 | WU Joseph | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 8 | MISHIMA Torata | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 9 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 10 | GOHEL Dayus T. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
| 11 | KUDRIAVTCEV Sergei | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 12 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 13 | LIU Alexander | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 14 | SU Caleb | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
| 15 | JIN Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 16 | KOKENGE Reid | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 17 | MOSES Alexander | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 18 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 14% |
| 19 | GOLDFINE Ian J. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 20 | FELDMAN Jaemin | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 21 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 22 | DIXON Thomas | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 23 | HE Lawrence | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 24 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | - | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 28% | |
| 25 | IYOKI Kent | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 26 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 27 | ZHANG Alec | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | ZHU Max | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 29 | SHAH Maximilian A. | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 31 | LEE Noah | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
| 32 | JIN daniel | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 33 | PRASAD Ankith | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 34 | PHILLIPS Jeffrey T. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 35 | LIEF Isaac R. | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 36 | GREEN Jabreel | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | WU Byron | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 38 | KIM Dylan J. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 39 | LIU Kyle | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
| 40 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 41 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 42 | MCKEEVER Luca | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 43 | KROPP Jack | - | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 19% |
| 44 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 21% |
| 45 | PAN Eric | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 46 | GAO Daniel | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 47 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 48 | KOPPE Alexander | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | SINGHA Orion | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 50 | PARK Ian C. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 51 | WONG Adam L. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 52 | KANG Philip F. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 6% |
| 53 | KIM Darius H. | 1% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 54 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 55 | LEONE III Charles D. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 56 | PARK Elliot | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 57 | GALLANT Antoine | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 58 | JAIN Aditya | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 59 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 60 | HIGGINS Branford | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 61 | CHU Allan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 62 | PRIHODKO Max | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 63 | HARR Carver | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 64 | NIKOLOV Peter | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 65 | ZHAO corey | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 66 | LEE Seungwon | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 67 | LIN Kyran | - | - | 3% | 18% | 47% | 32% | |
| 67 | ZHENG Haoran | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 17% | 2% | |
| 69 | LACROIX Floryan | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 70 | HE Yuhao | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 71 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 72 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 1% | 9% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 73 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 74 | LO Jake | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 75 | SENNEWALD Frederick A. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 76 | WOLFE Alex | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 77 | STRAUSS Luke | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 78 | CHOI Mason | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 79 | PARK Frederick | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 80 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 81 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 82 | LI Patrick | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 83 | XIAO Andrew | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 84 | WONG Adrian | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 85 | JAIN Sarthak | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 86 | YUAN Calvin | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 87 | SHIV Rishi | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 88 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 89 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 90 | DENNIS Ethan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 91 | IMREK Elijah S. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 92 | GUNDA Saketh | 6% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 93 | WU Jonathan | 6% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 94 | KOBI Samuel | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 95 | SARKAR agniv | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 96 | CHOI Isaac | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 97 | NEAL John P. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 98 | CUI Oscar (Bo Lang) | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 99 | PINERO Jose J. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 100 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 101 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 102 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 103 | WONG KEVIN | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 104 | NGUYEN Tate | 2% | 19% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 104 | GUAN Nathan | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 106 | WANG owen | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 107 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 107 | DIVERIS Joseph | 25% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 19% | 46% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | WEI Jonny | 9% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 111 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | 36% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 112 | GU Aidan | 34% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 113 | WANG DEVON | 3% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 114 | SHA Michael | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 115 | YANG Edward | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 116 | PHAM Sawyer T. | 3% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 117 | YOUNG Peyton E. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 118 | SARKAR Anish | 12% | 39% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 119 | JUN Jaywu | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 120 | SKAALAND Will | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 121 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 121 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 123 | SENNEWALD James J. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 124 | LIM Matthew T. | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 125 | KIM Nathan | 2% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 126 | FU Ethan | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 127 | GAO Chaney C. | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 127 | PHUKAN Rohin | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 129 | ZHANG Andrew | 42% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 130 | PARK Nicholas | 4% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 131 | KIM Sullivan | 55% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 132 | DU SHUNYU K. | 28% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 133 | AGGELER Donovan | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 134 | FERGUSON Jason | 10% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 135 | LOISEAU Eliott | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 136 | DAO Alexander | 13% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 137 | MUGA Aiden | 39% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 138 | EVANS noah | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 139 | GAO Zachary | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 140 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 15% | 35% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 141 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 142 | LEE JoonWon | 43% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 142 | SURESH NEERAJ | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 144 | CHIN Dylan A. | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 144 | ZHU Eric | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.