March NAC

Y-12 Men's Épée

Monday, March 4, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LEE Daniel Y. - - - 3% 16% 42% 39%
2 PARK Ian C. - - - 1% 11% 41% 46%
3 JIN Nicholas - - 1% 9% 31% 44% 15%
3 PRASAD Ankith - - - - 2% 20% 78%
5 LIOZNYANSKY Simon - - 1% 5% 22% 44% 28%
6 AGAON Shawn - 3% 14% 29% 32% 17% 4%
7 ZHANG Nicholas Z. - - 1% 10% 32% 41% 17%
8 BUROVSKY Maxim - 1% 5% 17% 34% 32% 11%
9 YOUNG Peyton E. - - - 2% 11% 37% 50%
10 SALERNO Gaetano - 4% 15% 31% 32% 16% 3%
11 JIN daniel - 1% 7% 27% 43% 22%
12 LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA - - - 1% 9% 40% 50%
13 BORODITSKY Ethan - - 2% 9% 27% 39% 23%
14 SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. - - - 3% 18% 45% 33%
15 LEE Shwan - - 2% 13% 32% 37% 15%
16 JEYOON Ryan S. - - 2% 11% 29% 39% 20%
17 PANAYOTOV Alexander - 2% 10% 28% 36% 20% 4%
18 DEKERMANJI Christopher - - 3% 13% 31% 36% 16%
19 SINGHA Orion - - - 1% 10% 36% 52%
20 SENNEWALD Frederick A. - - 2% 10% 29% 40% 19%
21 ALVAREZ Ian T. - - 3% 15% 37% 37% 7%
22 CHAI Jonathan - - 1% 9% 32% 44% 14%
23 GOLDFINE Ian J. - - - 1% 6% 33% 60%
24 GOHEL Dayus T. - - 1% 8% 28% 42% 21%
25 LIN Kyran - 1% 7% 28% 43% 22%
26 WANG DEVON - 3% 14% 33% 34% 14% 2%
27 CHAMBLISS Logan C. - 1% 8% 27% 39% 21% 4%
27 LIEF Isaac R. - - 2% 12% 32% 38% 15%
29 ZHAO Jonathan - 5% 19% 33% 29% 13% 2%
30 LEE Noah - - 2% 9% 27% 40% 22%
31 FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. - 4% 19% 36% 30% 10% 1%
32 PARK Frederick 5% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
33 AGAON Ethan - - 3% 16% 35% 34% 12%
34 MACARTY Jordan T. - 2% 10% 27% 35% 22% 5%
35 SONN Rohan 5% 22% 35% 27% 10% 2% < 1%
36 WIMMER Nathaniel P. - - - 3% 16% 42% 39%
37 IMREK Elijah S. - 7% 28% 39% 21% 4% -
38 YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. - 2% 11% 28% 36% 20% 3%
39 DIECK Logan O. - 1% 9% 25% 36% 23% 5%
40 KHANNA Nikhil - 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 5%
41 KOKENGE Reid - 4% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
42 SU Caleb - 1% 6% 20% 36% 29% 9%
43 BEZRODNOV Michael - 2% 9% 24% 34% 24% 7%
44 MEDINA Michael A. - 3% 11% 26% 33% 21% 5%
44 HONGYI WANG - 1% 9% 26% 38% 23% 3%
46 CARRIER Gabriel A. - 3% 13% 31% 35% 16% 2%
46 DESTEFANO Julius 1% 6% 21% 35% 27% 9% 1%
48 THOMAS Harris 1% 9% 29% 37% 20% 4% -
49 JUN Jaywu - 3% 14% 30% 33% 17% 3%
50 LEONE Charles D. - - 2% 11% 30% 38% 19%
51 DILLE Jackson K. 2% 14% 30% 32% 17% 5% -
52 DACKO Alexander V. 14% 36% 34% 14% 3% - -
53 SENNEWALD James J. 1% 10% 27% 33% 21% 6% 1%
54 NIKOLOV Peter 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
55 CHU Allan 3% 18% 37% 30% 11% 2% -
56 BEZRODNOV Alexander - - 3% 14% 35% 36% 12%
57 VELINOV Gabriel - 3% 16% 35% 32% 12% 2%
58 O'DONNELL Benjamin - - 2% 12% 35% 40% 12%
58 BAGCHI Aritra - 4% 17% 34% 32% 12% 1%
60 GISLER Leo 13% 33% 32% 16% 4% 1% -
61 PHAM Sawyer T. 12% 32% 33% 17% 5% 1% -
62 IRWIN Peter 3% 14% 30% 32% 17% 4% -
63 SEEFELDT William Henry C. - 1% 6% 21% 37% 28% 7%
64 GIUSSANI Edoardo 1% 10% 29% 36% 19% 4% -
65 TREBON Hayden 1% 9% 27% 36% 21% 5% -
66 KATS Dylan G. - - 1% 8% 26% 40% 24%
67 ZENG Zihan 2% 11% 27% 33% 21% 6% 1%
68 MICKO Fritz K. 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
69 GRZYBICKI Kaj 1% 7% 23% 34% 25% 9% 1%
70 JAIN Aditya - - 1% 9% 27% 40% 23%
71 MENDOZA Zander 3% 18% 37% 30% 10% 1% -
72 SCOFIELD Thien J. 1% 7% 23% 35% 26% 8% 1%
73 ARKHIPOV Peter 1% 10% 28% 35% 20% 5% -
74 DURKIN Tristan E. - 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2%
75 CANO Marcos E. 1% 5% 19% 32% 28% 13% 2%
76 ROLLO Emmett H. 1% 9% 32% 38% 17% 3%
77 ILYAS Zakariya 2% 14% 32% 32% 16% 4% -
78 LEE Samuel Y. - 3% 16% 35% 33% 12% 2%
79 VACCARO Dominick J. 4% 18% 33% 30% 13% 3% -
80 LONCAR Luka E. - 2% 9% 24% 34% 24% 7%
81 WRIGHT Christopher 3% 16% 32% 30% 15% 3% -
82 ELYADERANI Paxon 4% 21% 35% 28% 10% 2% -
83 ROMERO KURI Carlos Alexander 20% 41% 29% 9% 1% - -
84 HILBERT Gabriel E. 7% 28% 39% 22% 5% - -
85 KOBI Samuel - 4% 17% 32% 30% 14% 2%
86 SONG Alexander 1% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% 1%
87 ZHANG Braydon 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
88 GAITHER Christopher W. - 7% 26% 39% 23% 5% -
89 HIGGIN Matthew 11% 33% 36% 16% 3% - -
90 JANG Elliot 1% 10% 32% 38% 17% 3%
91 YANG Edward 20% 40% 29% 10% 1% - -
92 BAZHENOV Anthony - 1% 7% 26% 43% 22% 3%
93 GUO Yilu - 3% 15% 31% 32% 16% 3%
94 LEE Seungwon 3% 22% 40% 26% 8% 1% -
95 YAO Geoffrey B. - 4% 17% 32% 31% 14% 3%
96 DAO Alexander 3% 16% 31% 31% 16% 4% -
96 LAZARRE Alex 5% 22% 35% 26% 10% 2% -
98 SKORUPAN Grant - 1% 7% 27% 41% 22% 2%
99 WEI Michael 4% 19% 33% 29% 12% 2% -
99 NGUYEN Tate 8% 29% 37% 21% 6% 1% -
101 WOLFE Alex 10% 36% 37% 15% 3% - -
102 GREGSTON Layland - 1% 7% 26% 42% 24% 2%
103 JIANG Matthew 13% 34% 33% 15% 3% - -
104 WEI Jonny 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
105 ZHANG Kingston 15% 34% 31% 15% 4% 1% -
106 WANG owen 31% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -
107 SARKAR Anish 11% 32% 35% 17% 4% - -
108 VEERAVALLI Vivek 2% 21% 40% 28% 8% 1% -
109 POPA Ethan 29% 43% 22% 5% 1% -
111 SARKAR agniv 7% 26% 35% 23% 8% 1% -
112 ZAYDMAN David M. 9% 34% 36% 17% 4% - -
113 CHIN Dylan A. 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 6% 1%
114 WALCH Logan 7% 28% 38% 22% 5% - -
114 FUSSMAN Yuval 20% 44% 28% 7% 1% - -
116 KIM Nathan 2% 11% 28% 33% 20% 6% 1%
117 PHUKAN Rohin 50% 39% 10% 1% - - -
118 BUERGISSER Kai 27% 42% 24% 6% 1% - -
119 SPINA Joseph B. - 4% 17% 32% 31% 14% 2%
119 ZHANG Yuelin 2% 13% 28% 32% 19% 5% -
121 LO Jake 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2% -
122 TIKHOMIROV Theodore 3% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
123 OLAR Daniel 7% 27% 37% 23% 6% - -
124 PRIHODKO Max 1% 12% 32% 35% 17% 3% -
126 ROMANOV Ethan 2% 12% 29% 33% 18% 5% -
126 MUGA Aiden 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% - -
128 FANG Hanning 9% 28% 34% 21% 7% 1% -
129 GUO ZIXU 2% 16% 34% 32% 14% 3% -
130 LOWENSTEIN Isaac 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% - -
130 SHA Michael 5% 30% 40% 20% 4% - -
132 PAN Tristan 3% 29% 41% 21% 5% 1% -
133 PARK Nicholas 11% 30% 34% 19% 6% 1% -
134 CHOI Mason 3% 19% 37% 30% 9% 1% -
135 YU Austin 23% 40% 27% 9% 2% - -
136 DAVIS Jonah 15% 35% 32% 14% 3% - -
137 HU Anton 30% 42% 22% 6% 1% - -
138 ADAMS Julius J. 7% 28% 37% 21% 6% 1% -
139 LOISEAU Eliott 3% 17% 34% 30% 13% 3% -
140 WITTENWYLER Henry 59% 33% 7% 1% - - -
141 LI Zachary 45% 39% 13% 2% - - -
142 KENT V David 24% 50% 22% 4% - -
144 WANG zhixing（Danile） 7% 28% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
145 RIPA Joseph K. 38% 41% 17% 4% - - -
146 KNUDSEN Travis 3% 19% 36% 29% 11% 2% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.