October NAC

Cadet Men's Épée

Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 1:00 PM

Minneapolis, MN, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ZHANG Nicholas Z. - - - - 2% 21% 77%
2 PRASAD Ankith - - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
3 LEE Daniel Y. - - - 1% 11% 41% 46%
3 CLICK Aiden - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
5 GOHEL Dayus T. - - - 3% 16% 42% 39%
6 BEZRODNOV Alexander - - - 2% 14% 40% 45%
7 PARK Ian C. - - - 1% 8% 36% 55%
8 SU Caleb - - - 5% 21% 43% 31%
9 KUDRIAVTCEV Sergei - - 2% 13% 35% 38% 12%
10 LIOZNYANSKY Simon - - 1% 9% 27% 40% 22%
11 NORTH Alexander M. - - 2% 10% 29% 40% 20%
12 KATS Dylan G. - - 1% 6% 24% 43% 26%
13 WANG DEVON - - 3% 16% 37% 35% 9%
14 JIN Nicholas - - - 4% 19% 43% 33%
15 LIEF Isaac R. - 1% 6% 24% 43% 27%
16 LU Ivan 1% 5% 18% 32% 29% 13% 2%
17 GOLDFINE Ian J. - - 1% 6% 24% 43% 26%
17 BORODITSKY Ethan - - 1% 6% 27% 45% 21%
19 YOUNG Peyton E. - - - 2% 16% 44% 38%
20 LONCAR Luka E. - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
20 CHONG christopher - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
22 ZHAO Corey - - 1% 5% 20% 41% 33%
23 KOKENGE Reid - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
24 CARRIER Gabriel A. - 1% 5% 19% 35% 31% 10%
25 DAVOODIAN Christopher - 1% 6% 22% 37% 27% 5%
26 KIM Byung - - 2% 13% 33% 38% 14%
27 LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA - - 1% 7% 26% 43% 24%
28 RICHARDS Jackson D. - 2% 14% 35% 34% 13% 2%
29 DESTEFANO Julius - 3% 16% 35% 34% 12%
30 ROLLO Emmett H. 1% 7% 24% 35% 25% 8% 1%
31 LO Jake - 1% 6% 21% 36% 29% 8%
32 YU Hunter 1% 11% 32% 35% 16% 3% -
33 JEYOON Ryan S. - - - 3% 18% 43% 35%
34 CHAI Jonathan - - 1% 9% 28% 40% 21%
35 JORDAN Anton - 3% 15% 33% 33% 15% 2%
36 CHOI Mason - 1% 8% 29% 42% 19%
37 DODIN David - 1% 6% 22% 38% 27% 6%
38 ESKRIDGE Caleb 1% 10% 31% 37% 18% 4% -
39 MAHESH Tarun - 2% 13% 32% 35% 16% 2%
40 LEE Shwan - - - 4% 18% 43% 35%
41 HE Zhiheng - 6% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1%
42 LIN Kyran - - 2% 11% 29% 38% 20%
43 DEKERMANJI Christopher - - 2% 14% 37% 35% 10%
44 CHIRASHNYA Daniel - 1% 7% 25% 40% 24% 4%
45 SAVORETTI Francesco - 6% 30% 40% 20% 3%
46 ZHENG Haoran - 1% 10% 33% 40% 16%
47 DIECK Logan O. - 2% 15% 36% 35% 12%
48 SENNEWALD James J. - 1% 8% 30% 42% 20%
49 IMREK Elijah S. - - 4% 18% 37% 32% 9%
50 ZI QIN Shang - 1% 9% 27% 39% 22% 2%
51 GAO Chaney C. - 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 2%
51 WOLFE Alex - 2% 11% 30% 36% 18% 3%
53 KIM Dylan J. - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 18%
54 WONG Chi Ho - - 1% 5% 24% 44% 27%
55 ALVAREZ Ian T. - - 4% 19% 38% 30% 7%
56 WRIGHT Christopher - 1% 6% 22% 40% 26% 5%
57 SILVERS Ari - 2% 12% 28% 33% 19% 4%
58 SINGHA Orion - 1% 5% 19% 35% 30% 10%
59 ROMERO KURI Carlos Alexander - 2% 10% 27% 35% 21% 4%
60 CHIRASHNYA Adam - 1% 8% 23% 36% 26% 6%
61 KNOX James - 3% 19% 40% 30% 8%
62 RUBIN Daniel - 3% 13% 30% 33% 17% 3%
63 KOPPE Alexander 1% 10% 31% 38% 18% 3%
63 WANG Clayton 2% 16% 37% 32% 11% 1%
65 ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) 1% 13% 32% 33% 17% 4% < 1%
66 XIAO Hanzhi （Shawn） 5% 26% 38% 24% 6% 1%
67 LEE Noah - 1% 8% 29% 41% 21%
68 SENNEWALD Frederick A. - - 1% 9% 29% 42% 19%
69 PRIHODKO Max - - 3% 15% 35% 34% 12%
70 BEZRODNOV Michael - - - 3% 18% 43% 36%
71 NGUYEN Tate - - 5% 22% 40% 28% 5%
72 HIGGINS Branford - - 4% 19% 37% 30% 9%
73 PANG Lucas - 1% 4% 17% 34% 32% 12%
74 ZHANG Caden 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 6% -
75 LEE Samuel Y. - - 5% 18% 36% 31% 10%
76 MACARTY Jordan T. - - 1% 9% 34% 42% 14%
77 POS Theo - - 2% 13% 33% 37% 14%
78 PAK Elliot - 8% 30% 40% 19% 4% -
79 CHOI Zachary 5% 27% 38% 23% 6% 1% -
80 KOBI Samuel - - 2% 13% 32% 37% 16%
81 ZENG Zihan - - 7% 27% 40% 22% 3%
82 ZHU Eric - 1% 13% 36% 36% 13% 1%
83 PARK Elliot - - 4% 18% 35% 32% 11%
84 STRAUSS Luke - 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8%
85 BARG Jonathan 1% 11% 32% 35% 17% 4% -
86 BRODSKY Julian 3% 20% 38% 28% 9% 1% -
87 KHANNA Nikhil - - 4% 17% 34% 32% 11%
88 CHAMBLISS Logan C. - 5% 20% 35% 28% 10% 1%
88 PARK Nicholas - 3% 15% 31% 33% 16% 3%
90 ZAYDMAN Ethan 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
91 MURPHY Thomas P. - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6%
92 EVERS Gabriel 1% 9% 27% 35% 21% 6% -
93 FU Leon - 5% 20% 36% 29% 8% 1%
94 CAO Brad - 3% 14% 33% 35% 14% 1%
95 GAO Daniel - - - 5% 25% 44% 25%
96 ARKHIPOV Peter - 4% 19% 34% 29% 11% 2%
97 JONES Aiden 1% 9% 27% 35% 21% 6% 1%
98 FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. - 2% 10% 27% 36% 21% 4%
98 MAO Benjamin 4% 24% 39% 26% 7% 1% -
100 KUMAR Aidan - 1% 9% 29% 38% 20% 3%
101 KIM Nathan - - 5% 23% 41% 25% 5%
102 LEE Chun Po 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7% 1%
103 CHOI Kaiden I. - 6% 21% 35% 27% 10% 1%
104 KWOUN Miles S. - 4% 18% 35% 31% 11% 1%
104 ZHENG Andy - 1% 9% 30% 37% 19% 3%
106 GOHSMAN Maxwell - 8% 29% 37% 21% 5% -
106 DONAHUE Lake 2% 19% 37% 29% 11% 2% -
106 XIAO Andrew 1% 9% 25% 34% 23% 8% 1%
109 WU Jonathan - - 5% 20% 38% 29% 7%
110 BUTLER Joel 7% 28% 39% 22% 4% - -
111 ARAVIND Athreya - 4% 18% 34% 30% 12% 2%
112 LEE Seungwon - - 6% 24% 38% 25% 6%
112 YAO Bowen 7% 29% 39% 20% 4% - -
114 KOZAKIEWICZ Filip - - 4% 16% 34% 34% 12%
115 YANG Boyan - 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 4%
116 KRZYSIAK David F. 1% 8% 25% 35% 23% 7% 1%
117 PHAM Sawyer T. - 4% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3%
118 COUSINS Cameron - 4% 16% 33% 32% 13% 2%
119 KOYFMAN Benjamin 10% 32% 35% 18% 5% 1% -
120 YUE Hongrui - 4% 18% 35% 30% 11% 1%
121 LI Patrick - 2% 12% 30% 35% 18% 3%
122 SCHIEK Harrison 5% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
123 LIU Yikun 13% 36% 34% 14% 3% - -
124 WANG zhixing (Daniel） 1% 10% 30% 37% 19% 4% -
125 LEONE III Charles D. - - 2% 12% 32% 38% 16%
126 KUGLER Luke 4% 32% 41% 19% 4% - -
126 WANG Jensen - 4% 19% 37% 30% 9% 1%
128 PARK Frederick - 5% 20% 37% 29% 8%
129 CAO Albert - - 2% 13% 35% 38% 12%
130 HILBERT Gabriel E. - 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8%
130 CUI Oscar (Bo Lang) - - 4% 17% 38% 33% 8%
132 LAM Alan 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
133 HEADRICK Lance 2% 15% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
134 HU Anton 10% 34% 36% 16% 4% - -
135 LEE JoonWon 2% 13% 30% 32% 18% 5% -
136 ZHAI Avalo 2% 19% 39% 30% 9% 1% -
137 YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. - - 1% 7% 28% 46% 17%
138 SANTOS Francisco M. 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% - -
139 TIKHOMIROV Theodore 1% 12% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
140 JIN Daniel - 2% 12% 32% 38% 16%
141 KARNAS Karol 1% 9% 33% 37% 17% 3%
142 LAI Aedin - 3% 18% 36% 31% 11% 1%
143 SPINA Joseph B. - 6% 24% 37% 24% 7% 1%
144 NIKOLOV Peter - 1% 9% 27% 37% 22% 4%
145 SINGH Aryaman 1% 10% 28% 36% 20% 5% -
146 CHU Allan - 1% 9% 28% 38% 20% 3%
147 SEEFELDT William Henry C. - - 4% 18% 37% 33% 7%
148 FAN Jackson - 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 5%
149 ROMANOV Ethan 5% 23% 36% 25% 9% 2% -
150 DAVIS Jonah 2% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
150 ZOU Xianyang 12% 36% 35% 14% 3% - -
152 SONN Rohan 4% 19% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
153 SCHULZE Ethan - - 2% 14% 40% 35% 9%
154 LAI Boden 2% 23% 39% 26% 8% 1% -
155 YAO Geoffrey B. - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 15%
156 PAN Tristan 1% 16% 37% 33% 12% 2% -
157 O'DONNELL Benjamin - 2% 12% 30% 35% 18% 3%
157 CHIN Dylan A. - 5% 19% 35% 29% 10% 1%
157 MIAO KUNQI 14% 37% 33% 14% 3% - -
160 GOON Tristan Yang 13% 33% 33% 16% 4% - -
161 ZHENG Jerry 8% 29% 37% 20% 5% - -
162 WANG Terry - - 4% 17% 36% 33% 10%
163 PRAKASH Hari 11% 36% 35% 15% 3% - -
164 PATEL Kushal 20% 39% 29% 11% 2% - -
165 CAUCHY Eliot 9% 32% 38% 17% 3% - -
166 WIMMER Nathaniel P. - 2% 16% 38% 33% 10%
167 MODULLA Yathin R. 4% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1%
168 VODOVOZOV Denis 19% 43% 29% 8% 1% -
169 TWEMLOW Sacha 29% 44% 22% 5% - -
170 SANTOS Antonio K. 30% 41% 22% 6% 1% - -
171 LI Zachary 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% - -
172 SHA Michael 1% 10% 29% 36% 19% 4% -
172 MURPHY Aidan 11% 32% 35% 17% 4% 1% -
174 ZHANG Alec - 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 4%
174 SAVORETTI Pietro 3% 17% 35% 31% 13% 2% -
176 SEBASTIAN Alexander P. 5% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1% -
177 WEI Zheng (Jonny) 1% 7% 22% 33% 26% 10% 1%
178 TORRES Nicolas 1% 7% 23% 35% 25% 8% 1%
179 FUSSMAN Yuval 7% 29% 38% 21% 5% - -
180 FANG Hanning 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
181 HOGE William P. 3% 34% 40% 18% 4% - -
182 MUGA Aiden 5% 27% 37% 23% 7% 1% -
183 DHAL Leon 18% 39% 30% 11% 2% - -
184 LEE Inwoo 1% 11% 39% 35% 13% 2% -
184 ERLIKHMAN Adrian 7% 40% 37% 13% 2% - -
186 HU Robert J. 19% 41% 30% 9% 1% - -
187 KIM Jayden 1% 9% 28% 37% 20% 4% -
187 MITEV Alexander 4% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1% -
187 WATT Darren - 4% 17% 34% 32% 12% 2%
190 WANG owen 1% 8% 27% 35% 22% 6% 1%
190 NG Biwon 23% 43% 26% 7% 1% - -
192 HAMZA Tudor - 3% 17% 35% 32% 12% 2%
192 LEE Aiden 5% 21% 35% 27% 11% 2% -
192 CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan 6% 26% 38% 24% 6% 1% -
195 VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. 6% 26% 37% 23% 7% 1% -
196 KIM Ian 1% 11% 30% 35% 18% 4% -
197 ALI Farhan 7% 35% 38% 16% 3% - -
198 LEE JiYuen 33% 43% 20% 4% - - -
199 CHAI Ethan 20% 48% 26% 6% 1% -
200 BLACK Zachary 42% 41% 15% 3% - -
201 LIN Zizhen 50% 41% 8% 1% - -
202 PHUKAN Rohin - 5% 20% 37% 29% 8% -
203 PETROV Niki A. 3% 17% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
204 KIM Matthew 26% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
205 CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3% -
206 ZHAO Zidong 48% 39% 12% 2% - - -
207 IARIKOV Nicholas - < 1% 4% 16% 34% 34% 12%
207 TRULL A.J. 6% 29% 37% 21% 6% 1% -
207 ZHANG Joe 2% 18% 37% 30% 10% 1% -
210 XIONG Aaron 1% 17% 40% 31% 10% 1% -
211 KANG EUNWOO 2% 17% 38% 31% 11% 2% -
212 MIHALACHE David 3% 16% 33% 33% 14% 2% -
213 PETERSON Matthew 6% 26% 39% 24% 5% - -
214 GINZBURG Adam 7% 29% 38% 21% 5% - -
215 GRAVES Lawson 9% 31% 37% 18% 4% - -
216 BHATT Arjun 20% 41% 29% 9% 1% - -
217 WANG Steven 5% 28% 39% 22% 6% 1% -
218 SONG Troy 8% 29% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
219 CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun 61% 32% 6% 1% - - -
220 LIANG Eric 35% 42% 19% 4% - - -
221 REID Wesley 64% 32% 4% - - - -
222 VUILLEMIN Gregoire 27% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
223 LIPPMAN Jake 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1% -
224 KIM Minjae - 5% 21% 37% 27% 8% 1%
225 CHEN Bowen 55% 36% 9% 1% - - -
226 CHADDA Ilyas 37% 42% 17% 3% - - -
227 CHUNG Andrew 46% 42% 11% 1% - -
228 CHAKRABORTY Zorian 69% 27% 4% - - - -
228 BENTAHA Averroes 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
230 SUN Neo 78% 20% 2% - - - -
231 JU Hanul 20% 40% 29% 10% 2% - -
231 GOROZA Eric 58% 35% 7% 1% - - -
233 MISHRA Milan B. 19% 40% 30% 10% 1% - -
234 NOFZIGER Bennett 49% 38% 11% 1% - - -
234 MALHAM Andrew 47% 39% 12% 2% - - -
236 SINGH Ravin 4% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1% -
237 JOHNSON Soren 54% 36% 9% 1% - - -
237 MODANLOU Navid 18% 41% 30% 9% 1% - -
239 PAN Anthony 61% 32% 6% 1% - - -
239 WU Chi Iong 16% 53% 26% 4% - - -
241 YU Austin 24% 52% 21% 3% - -
242 TEREB Daniel 69% 27% 4% - - - -
242 WU Chi Kuan 72% 25% 3% - - - -
244 SAUNIER Cameron 15% 37% 33% 13% 2% - -
244 JAIN Samyak 26% 41% 25% 7% 1% - -
246 JIANG Matthew 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% - -
247 MILEY Walker 82% 17% 1% - - - -
247 ZIEGLER John 23% 41% 26% 8% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.